Suppr超能文献

采用自适应迭代剂量降低技术3D在320排探测器CT上降低冠状动脉钙化积分的辐射剂量

Radiation dose reduction for coronary artery calcium scoring at 320-detector CT with adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D.

作者信息

Tatsugami Fuminari, Higaki Toru, Fukumoto Wataru, Kaichi Yoko, Fujioka Chikako, Kiguchi Masao, Yamamoto Hideya, Kihara Yasuki, Awai Kazuo

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan,

出版信息

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Jun;31(5):1045-52. doi: 10.1007/s10554-015-0637-7. Epub 2015 Mar 10.

Abstract

To assess the possibility of reducing the radiation dose for coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring by using adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D (AIDR 3D) on a 320-detector CT scanner. Fifty-four patients underwent routine- and low-dose CT for CAC scoring. Low-dose CT was performed at one-third of the tube current used for routine-dose CT. Routine-dose CT was reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) and low-dose CT was reconstructed with AIDR 3D. We compared the calculated Agatston-, volume-, and mass scores of these images. The overall percentage difference in the Agatston-, volume-, and mass scores between routine- and low-dose CT studies was 15.9, 11.6, and 12.6%, respectively. There were no significant differences in the routine- and low-dose CT studies irrespective of the scoring algorithms applied. The CAC measurements of both imaging modalities were highly correlated with respect to the Agatston- (r = 0.996), volume- (r = 0.996), and mass score (r = 0.997; p < 0.001, all); the Bland-Altman limits of agreement scores were -37.4 to 51.4, -31.2 to 36.4 and -30.3 to 40.9%, respectively, suggesting that AIDR 3D was a good alternative for FBP. The mean effective radiation dose for routine- and low-dose CT was 2.2 and 0.7 mSv, respectively. The use of AIDR 3D made it possible to reduce the radiation dose by 67% for CAC scoring without impairing the quantification of coronary calcification.

摘要

为评估在320排CT扫描仪上使用自适应迭代剂量降低3D(AIDR 3D)技术降低冠状动脉钙化(CAC)评分辐射剂量的可能性。54例患者接受了用于CAC评分的常规剂量和低剂量CT检查。低剂量CT扫描时管电流为常规剂量CT的三分之一。常规剂量CT采用滤波反投影(FBP)重建,低剂量CT采用AIDR 3D重建。我们比较了这些图像计算得出的阿加斯顿、体积和质量评分。常规剂量和低剂量CT研究之间阿加斯顿、体积和质量评分的总体百分比差异分别为15.9%、11.6%和12.6%。无论应用何种评分算法,常规剂量和低剂量CT研究之间均无显著差异。两种成像方式的CAC测量在阿加斯顿评分(r = 0.996)、体积评分(r = 0.996)和质量评分(r = 0.997;p < 0.001,均如此)方面高度相关;布兰德-奥特曼一致性界限评分分别为-37.4%至51.4%、-31.2%至36.4%和-30.3%至40.9%,表明AIDR 3D是FBP的良好替代方案。常规剂量和低剂量CT的平均有效辐射剂量分别为2.2和0.7 mSv。使用AIDR 3D可在不影响冠状动脉钙化定量的情况下将CAC评分的辐射剂量降低67%。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验