Fantoni Carlo, Rigutti Sara, Piccoli Valentina, Sommacal Elena, Carnaghi Andrea
Department of Life Sciences, Psychology Unit "Gaetano Kanizsa", University of Trieste, Via Weiss 21, 34128, Trieste, Italy.
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 28;11(6):e0158095. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158095. eCollection 2016.
Ample evidence attests that social intention, elicited through gestures explicitly signaling a request of communicative intention, affects the patterning of hand movement kinematics. The current study goes beyond the effect of social intention and addresses whether the same action of reaching to grasp an object for placing it in an end target position within or without a monitoring attendee's peripersonal space, can be moulded by pure social factors in general, and by social facilitation in particular. A motion tracking system (Optotrak Certus) was used to record motor acts. We carefully avoided the usage of communicative intention by keeping constant both the visual information and the positional uncertainty of the end target position, while we systematically varied the social status of the attendee (a high, or a low social status) in separated blocks. Only thirty acts performed in the presence of a different social status attendee, revealed a significant change of kinematic parameterization of hand movement, independently of the attendee's distance. The amplitude of peak velocity reached by the hand during the reach-to-grasp and the lift-to-place phase of the movement was larger in the high rather than in the low social status condition. By contrast, the deceleration time of the reach-to-grasp phase and the maximum grasp aperture was smaller in the high rather than in the low social status condition. These results indicated that the hand movement was faster but less carefully shaped in presence of a high, but not of a low social status attendee. This kinematic patterning suggests that being monitored by a high rather than a low social status attendee might lead participants to experience evaluation apprehension that informs the control of motor execution. Motor execution would rely more on feedforward motor control in the presence of a high social status human attendee, vs. feedback motor control, in the presence of a low social status attendee.
大量证据证明,通过明确传达交际意图的手势所引发的社会意图,会影响手部运动的运动学模式。当前的研究超越了社会意图的影响,探讨了在有或没有监督者个人空间内的情况下,伸手去抓取物体并将其放置在最终目标位置的相同动作,是否一般会受到纯粹社会因素的影响,特别是社会促进作用的影响。使用运动跟踪系统(Optotrak Certus)记录运动行为。我们通过保持视觉信息和最终目标位置的位置不确定性不变,仔细避免了交际意图的使用,同时我们在不同的组块中系统地改变监督者的社会地位(高或低)。只有在不同社会地位监督者在场的情况下进行的30次动作,显示出手部运动的运动学参数化有显著变化,与监督者的距离无关。在运动的伸手抓取和举起放置阶段,手部达到的峰值速度幅度在高社会地位条件下比低社会地位条件下更大。相比之下,伸手抓取阶段的减速时间和最大抓握孔径在高社会地位条件下比低社会地位条件下更小。这些结果表明,在高社会地位监督者而非低社会地位监督者在场时,手部运动更快但形状塑造更不精细。这种运动学模式表明,被高社会地位而非低社会地位监督者监视可能会导致参与者体验到评价性焦虑,从而影响运动执行的控制。与在低社会地位监督者在场时相比,在高社会地位人类监督者在场时,运动执行将更多地依赖前馈运动控制,而不是反馈运动控制。