Chin Nancy, Dozier Ann, Quinones Zahira, Diaz Sergio, Weber Emily, Almonte Hector, Bautista Arisleyda, Raman Kiran, McIntosh Scott, Ossip Deborah
1. Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
2. Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Catolica Madre y Maestra, Santiago, Dominican Republic.
Glob Health Promot. 2017 Dec;24(4):23-32. doi: 10.1177/1757975915626117. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
Understanding social conditions prior to intervention design can enhance tobacco control interventions. This paper describes formative research conducted in 2010 about tobacco use in eight economically disadvantaged Dominican Republic communities, four of which participated in a previous intervention study (2003-2008). A combined US-Dominican team used a rapid assessment process to collect qualitative social and cultural data on tobacco use, knowledge and attitudes; plus observations about social and policy factors, such as exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS), tobacco regulations, pregnancy, health care provider (HCP) practices and sustainability of the 2003-2008 intervention. This assessment found that tobacco use varied by age. While all ages typically used cigarettes, older adults used relatively more unprocessed tobacco, which is seen as less harmful and less addictive. Middle-aged smokers typically used commercial cigarettes, which are viewed as dangerous, addictive, expensive and offensive. Young adults reported avoiding smoking, but using relatively more smokeless tobacco. Smoking during pregnancy has reportedly decreased. SHS was viewed as harmful, although smoke-free homes were uncommon. HCPs discussed tobacco issues mostly for patients with tobacco-related conditions. Sustainability of the 2003-2008 intervention appeared to be linked to active Community Technology Centers with strong leadership, and community social capital. This information could be used to design better targeted interventions in these communities.
在干预设计之前了解社会状况可以加强烟草控制干预措施。本文描述了2010年针对多米尼加共和国八个经济贫困社区的烟草使用情况开展的形成性研究,其中四个社区参与了此前的一项干预研究(2003 - 2008年)。一个美多联合团队采用快速评估流程收集了关于烟草使用、知识和态度的定性社会文化数据;此外还观察了社会和政策因素,如二手烟暴露、烟草法规、怀孕、医疗服务提供者的做法以及2003 - 2008年干预措施的可持续性。该评估发现,烟草使用情况因年龄而异。虽然各年龄段的人通常都吸烟,但老年人使用相对更多的未加工烟草,这种烟草被认为危害较小且成瘾性较低。中年吸烟者通常使用商业香烟,这些香烟被视为危险、成瘾、昂贵且令人反感。年轻人报告称会避免吸烟,但使用相对更多的无烟烟草。据报道,怀孕期间吸烟的情况有所减少。二手烟被视为有害,尽管无烟家庭并不常见。医疗服务提供者大多只为患有与烟草相关疾病的患者讨论烟草问题。2003 - 2008年干预措施的可持续性似乎与有强有力领导的活跃社区技术中心以及社区社会资本有关。这些信息可用于在这些社区设计更具针对性的干预措施。