我们与低收入和中等收入国家合作伙伴开展合作研究时的伦理审查问题：一个案例
Ethical review issues in collaborative research between us and low-middle income country partners: a case example.
作者信息
McIntosh Scott, Sierra Essie, Dozier Ann, Diaz Sergio, Quiñones Zahira, Primack Aron, Chadwick Gary, Ossip-Klein Deborah J
机构信息
University of Rochester, Community & Preventive Medicine, Rochester, New York 14627-8969, United States.
出版信息
Bioethics. 2008 Sep;22(8):414-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00662.x. Epub 2008 Jun 28.
Abstract
The current ethical structure for collaborative international health research stems largely from developed countries' standards of proper ethical practices. The result is that ethical committees in developing countries are required to adhere to standards that might impose practices that conflict with local culture and unintended interpretations of ethics, treatments, and research. This paper presents a case example of a joint international research project that successfully established inclusive ethical review processes as well as other groundwork and components necessary for the conduct of human behavior research and research capacity building in the host country.
摘要
当前国际合作卫生研究的伦理架构很大程度上源于发达国家的正当伦理实践标准。结果是，发展中国家的伦理委员会被要求遵循可能会强加与当地文化以及对伦理、治疗和研究的意外解读相冲突的做法的标准。本文呈现了一个联合国际研究项目的案例，该项目成功建立了包容性的伦理审查流程以及在东道国开展人类行为研究和研究能力建设所需的其他基础工作和组成部分。
相似文献
1
Ethical review issues in collaborative research between us and low-middle income country partners: a case example.我们与低收入和中等收入国家合作伙伴开展合作研究时的伦理审查问题：一个案例
Bioethics. 2008 Sep;22(8):414-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00662.x. Epub 2008 Jun 28.
2
Ethical review of health research: a perspective from developing country researchers.卫生研究的伦理审查：来自发展中国家研究人员的视角
J Med Ethics. 2004 Feb;30(1):68-72. doi: 10.1136/jme.2002.001933.
3
Ethical challenges for international collaborative research partnerships in the context of the Zika outbreak in the Dominican Republic: a qualitative case study.多米尼加共和国寨卡疫情背景下国际合作研究伙伴关系面临的伦理挑战：一项定性案例研究
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Sep 25;15(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0246-0.
4
Ethics committees. Research ethics: beyond the guidelines.伦理委员会。研究伦理：超越指南。
Dev World Bioeth. 2001 May;1(1):57-68. doi: 10.1111/1471-8847.00008.
5
Challenges faced by research ethics committees in El Salvador: results from a focus group study.萨尔瓦多研究伦理委员会面临的挑战：焦点小组研究结果
Dev World Bioeth. 2009 Apr;9(1):11-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2007.00225.x. Epub 2007 Dec 18.
6
Ethical approval in developing countries is not optional.在发展中国家，伦理审批不是可有可无的。
J Med Ethics. 2012 Jul;38(7):428-30. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100123. Epub 2012 Feb 16.
7
Some ethical issues in international collaborative research in developing countries.发展中国家国际合作研究中的一些伦理问题。
Int Dent J. 1998 Dec;48(6):552-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1875-595x.1998.tb00491.x.
8
Are ethics committees always ethical?伦理委员会是否始终合乎伦理？
Int J Nurs Pract. 2006 Feb;12(1):1-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-172X.2006.00549.x.
9
Developing a framework for the ethical design and conduct of pragmatic trials in healthcare: a mixed methods research protocol.制定医疗保健中实用临床试验的伦理设计和实施框架：混合方法研究方案。
Trials. 2018 Sep 27;19(1):525. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2895-x.
10
Conducting research with human subjects in international settings: ethical considerations.在国际环境中进行涉及人类受试者的研究：伦理考虑。
Yale J Biol Med. 2013 Sep 20;86(3):315-21. eCollection 2013 Sep.
引用本文的文献
1
A globally networked hybrid approach to public health capacity training for maternal health professionals in low and middle income countries.一种面向低收入和中等收入国家孕产妇健康专业人员的全球网络化混合式公共卫生能力培训方法。
Glob Health Res Policy. 2017 Mar 1;2:8. doi: 10.1186/s41256-017-0027-x. eCollection 2017.
2
Lessons Learned from Twelve Years of Partnered Tobacco Cessation Research in the Dominican Republic.从多米尼加共和国十二年合作戒烟研究中吸取的经验教训。
J Smok Cessat. 2016 Jun;11(2):99-107. doi: 10.1017/jsc.2016.4. Epub 2016 May 10.
3
Tobacco Cessation in Economically Disadvantaged Dominican Republic Communities: Who are the Ex-Users?多米尼加共和国经济弱势社区的戒烟情况：曾经的吸烟者都是谁？
J Smok Cessat. 2016 Dec;11(4):239-249. doi: 10.1017/jsc.2015.3. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
4
A qualitative study of tobacco use in eight economically disadvantaged Dominican Republic communities.对多米尼加共和国八个经济贫困社区烟草使用情况的定性研究。
Glob Health Promot. 2017 Dec;24(4):23-32. doi: 10.1177/1757975915626117. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
5
Development and Implementation of Culturally Tailored Offline Mobile Health Surveys.文化定制型离线移动健康调查的开发与实施。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2016 Jun 2;2(1):e28. doi: 10.2196/publichealth.5408.
6
Providing ethical guidance for collaborative research in developing countries.为发展中国家的合作研究提供伦理指导。
Res Ethics. 2015 Dec;11(4):211-235. doi: 10.1177/1747016115586759.
7
Cohort study of smoke-free homes in economically disadvantaged communities in the Dominican Republic.多米尼加共和国经济弱势社区无烟家庭的队列研究。
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2014 Jan;35(1):30-7.
8
International service and public health learning objectives for medical students.医学生的国际服务与公共卫生学习目标。
Health Educ J. 2013 Sep 1;72(5):530-536. doi: 10.1177/0017896912450874.
9
Understanding sociodemographic and sociocultural factors that characterize tobacco use and cessation during pregnancy among women in the Dominican Republic.了解多米尼加共和国女性孕期吸烟及戒烟的社会人口学和社会文化特征因素。
Matern Child Health J. 2014 Dec;18(10):2275-83. doi: 10.1007/s10995-013-1354-2.
10
Rethinking health research capacity strengthening.重新思考卫生研究能力加强。
Glob Public Health. 2013;8 Suppl 1(0 1):S104-24. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2013.786117. Epub 2013 May 7.
本文引用的文献
1
Tobacco use in the Dominican Republic: understanding the culture first.多米尼加共和国的烟草使用情况：首先了解其文化。
Tob Control. 2006 Jun;15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i30-6. doi: 10.1136/tc.2005.014852.
2
The role of training in global tobacco control research.培训在全球烟草控制研究中的作用。
Am J Public Health. 2005 Jun;95(6):946-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.046888.
3
The standard of care debate: can research in developing countries be both ethical and responsive to those countries' health needs?医疗护理标准之争：发展中国家的研究能否既符合伦理规范又满足这些国家的健康需求？
Am J Public Health. 2004 Jun;94(6):923-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.6.923.
4
Ethical review of health research: a perspective from developing country researchers.卫生研究的伦理审查：来自发展中国家研究人员的视角
J Med Ethics. 2004 Feb;30(1):68-72. doi: 10.1136/jme.2002.001933.
5
The role of the data coordinating center in the IRB review and approval process: the DIG trial experience.
Control Clin Trials. 2003 Dec;24(6 Suppl):306S-315S. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(03)00100-4.
6
Can transnational research be ethical in the developing world?在发展中国家进行跨国研究能符合道德规范吗？
Lancet. 2002 Oct 26;360(9342):1266. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11357-2.
7
Ethical oversight of public health research: can rules and IRBs make a difference in developing countries?公共卫生研究的伦理监督：规则和机构审查委员会能在发展中国家发挥作用吗？
Am J Public Health. 2002 Jul;92(7):1079-84. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.7.1079.
8
Who is my brother's keeper?谁来照顾我的兄弟？
J Med Ethics. 2002 Feb;28(1):24-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.28.1.24.
9
International research ethics: progress, but not perfection.国际研究伦理：有进展，但未臻完美。
Trends Mol Med. 2002 Feb;8(2):93-5. doi: 10.1016/s1471-4914(02)02277-3.
10
Ethical complexities of conducting research in developing countries.在发展中国家开展研究的伦理复杂性。
N Engl J Med. 1997 Oct 2;337(14):1003-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199710023371411.
Zotero 插件