• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

填埋场实施与管理的定量方案分析

Quantitative option analysis for implementation and management of landfills.

作者信息

Kerestecioğlu Merih

机构信息

COWI A/S, Lyngby, Denmark

出版信息

Waste Manag Res. 2016 Sep;34(9):905-11. doi: 10.1177/0734242X16652959. Epub 2016 Jun 27.

DOI:10.1177/0734242X16652959
PMID:27354014
Abstract

The selection of the most feasible strategy for implementation of landfills is a challenging step. Potential implementation options of landfills cover a wide range, from conventional construction contracts to the concessions. Montenegro, seeking to improve the efficiency of the public services while maintaining affordability, was considering privatisation as a way to reduce public spending on service provision. In this study, to determine the most feasible model for construction and operation of a regional landfill, a quantitative risk analysis was implemented with four steps: (i) development of a global risk matrix; (ii) assignment of qualitative probabilities of occurrences and magnitude of impacts; (iii) determination of the risks to be mitigated, monitored, controlled or ignored; (iv) reduction of the main risk elements; and (v) incorporation of quantitative estimates of probability of occurrence and expected impact for each risk element in the reduced risk matrix. The evaluated scenarios were: (i) construction and operation of the regional landfill by the public sector; (ii) construction and operation of the landfill by private sector and transfer of the ownership to the public sector after a pre-defined period; and (iii) operation of the landfill by the private sector, without ownership. The quantitative risk assessment concluded that introduction of a public private partnership is not the most feasible option, unlike the common belief in several public institutions in developing countries. A management contract for the first years of operation was advised to be implemented, after which, a long term operating contract may follow.

摘要

选择最可行的垃圾填埋场实施策略是具有挑战性的一步。垃圾填埋场的潜在实施选项范围广泛,从传统建筑合同到特许权。黑山在寻求提高公共服务效率同时保持可承受性,正在考虑将私有化作为减少公共服务提供支出的一种方式。在本研究中,为确定区域垃圾填埋场建设和运营的最可行模式,实施了四个步骤的定量风险分析:(i)制定全球风险矩阵;(ii)确定事件发生的定性概率和影响程度;(iii)确定需减轻、监测、控制或忽略的风险;(iv)减少主要风险因素;(v)将每个风险因素发生概率和预期影响的定量估计纳入简化后的风险矩阵。所评估的方案为:(i)公共部门建设和运营区域垃圾填埋场;(ii)私营部门建设和运营垃圾填埋场,并在预定义期限后将所有权转让给公共部门;(iii)私营部门运营垃圾填埋场,但无所有权。定量风险评估得出结论,与发展中国家一些公共机构的普遍看法不同,引入公私伙伴关系并非最可行的选择。建议在运营的头几年实施管理合同,之后可签订长期运营合同。

相似文献

1
Quantitative option analysis for implementation and management of landfills.填埋场实施与管理的定量方案分析
Waste Manag Res. 2016 Sep;34(9):905-11. doi: 10.1177/0734242X16652959. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
2
Public-private partnership in solid waste management sector in the West Bank of Palestine.巴勒斯坦西岸固体废物管理领域的公私伙伴关系。
Environ Monit Assess. 2019 Mar 26;191(4):243. doi: 10.1007/s10661-019-7395-2.
3
Mitigation of global greenhouse gas emissions from waste: conclusions and strategies from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report. Working Group III (Mitigation).减少废弃物产生的全球温室气体排放:政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)第四次评估报告的结论与策略。第三工作组(减缓气候变化)
Waste Manag Res. 2008 Feb;26(1):11-32. doi: 10.1177/0734242X07088433.
4
Landfill reduction experience in The Netherlands.荷兰的垃圾填埋场减少经验。
Waste Manag. 2014 Nov;34(11):2218-24. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.05.019. Epub 2014 Jul 4.
5
Public-private partnerships in the siting of hazardous waste facilities: the importance of trust.危险废物处理设施选址中的公私合作伙伴关系:信任的重要性。
Waste Manag Res. 2002 Jun;20(3):212-22. doi: 10.1177/0734242X0202000302.
6
The effect of increased private sector involvement in solid waste collection in five cities in Ghana.加纳五个城市中私营部门参与固体废物收集的效果。
Waste Manag Res. 2013 Oct;31(10 Suppl):81-92. doi: 10.1177/0734242X13496305. Epub 2013 Jul 15.
7
The new Waste Law: Challenging opportunity for future landfill operation in Indonesia.新《固体废物法》:印度尼西亚未来垃圾填埋场运营面临的挑战与机遇。
Waste Manag Res. 2011 Jan;29(1):20-9. doi: 10.1177/0734242X10384013. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
8
A novel approach in calculating site-specific aftercare completion criteria for landfills in The Netherlands: Policy developments.荷兰垃圾填埋场特定场地后续护理完成标准计算的新方法:政策发展
Waste Manag. 2016 Oct;56:255-61. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.07.038. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
9
Replication of urban innovations - prioritization of strategies for the replication of Dhaka's community-based decentralized composting model.城市创新的复制——优先考虑复制达卡社区分散式堆肥模式的策略。
Waste Manag Res. 2012 Jan;30(1):20-31. doi: 10.1177/0734242X10380116. Epub 2010 Aug 10.
10
Solid waste management in Croatia in response to the European Landfill Directive.克罗地亚针对《欧洲垃圾填埋指令》的固体废物管理。
Waste Manag Res. 2012 Aug;30(8):825-38. doi: 10.1177/0734242X12444897. Epub 2012 May 21.