Egan Brent M, Li Jiexiang, Wagner C Shaun
From the Care Coordination Institute, Greenville Health System, University of South Carolina School of Medicine (B.M.E., C.S.W.); and Department of Mathematics, College of Charleston, SC (J.L.).
Hypertension. 2016 Aug;68(2):318-23. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.116.07575. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
The Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP, mm Hg) Intervention Trial (SPRINT) showed that targeting SBP <120 mm Hg (intensive treatment, mean SBP: 121.5 mm Hg) versus <140 (standard treatment, mean SBP: 134.6 mm Hg) reduced cardiovascular events 25%. SPRINT has 2 implicit assumptions that could impact future US hypertension guidelines: (1) standard therapy controlled SBP similarly to that in adults with treated hypertension and (2) intensive therapy produced a lower mean SBP than in adults with treated hypertension and SBP <140 mm Hg. To examine these assumptions, US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2009 to 2012 data were analyzed on 3 groups of adults with treated hypertension: group 1 consisted of SPRINT-like participants aged ≥50 years; group 2 consisted of participants all aged ≥18 years; and group 3 consisted of participants aged ≥18 years excluding group 1 but otherwise similar to SPRINT-like participants except high cardiovascular risk. Mean SBPs in groups 1, 2, and 3 were 133.0, 130.1, and 124.6, with 66.2%, 72.2%, and 81.9%, respectively, controlled to SBP <140; 68.3%, 74.8%, and 83.4% of the controlled subset had SBP <130. Mean SBPs in those controlled to <140 were 123.3, 120.9, and 118.9, respectively. Among US adults with treated hypertension, (1) the SPRINT-like group had higher mean SBP than comparison groups, yet lower than SPRINT standard treatment group and (2) among groups 1 to 3 with SBP <140, SBP values were within <3 mm Hg of SPRINT intensive treatment. SPRINT results suggest that treatment should be continued and not reduced when treated SBP is <130, especially for the SPRINT-like subset. Furthermore, increasing the percentage of treated adults with SBP <140 could approximate SPRINT intensive treatment SBP without lowering treatment goals.
收缩压(SBP,毫米汞柱)干预试验(SPRINT)表明,将收缩压目标设定为低于120毫米汞柱(强化治疗,平均收缩压:121.5毫米汞柱)与低于140毫米汞柱(标准治疗,平均收缩压:134.6毫米汞柱)相比,心血管事件减少了25%。SPRINT有两个可能影响未来美国高血压指南的隐含假设:(1)标准治疗控制收缩压的效果与接受治疗的高血压成人相似;(2)强化治疗产生的平均收缩压低于接受治疗的高血压成人且收缩压低于140毫米汞柱。为检验这些假设,对2009年至2012年美国国家健康与营养检查调查中三组接受治疗的高血压成人的数据进行了分析:第一组由年龄≥50岁的类似SPRINT试验的参与者组成;第二组由年龄均≥18岁的参与者组成;第三组由年龄≥18岁但不包括第一组的参与者组成,且除心血管高风险外,其他方面与类似SPRINT试验的参与者相似。第一组、第二组和第三组的平均收缩压分别为133.0、130.1和124.6,收缩压控制在<140的比例分别为66.2%、72.2%和81.9%;收缩压控制在<130的比例分别为68.3%、74.8%和83.4%。收缩压控制在<140的人群的平均收缩压分别为123.3、120.9和118.9。在美国接受治疗的高血压成人中,(1)类似SPRINT试验的组的平均收缩压高于对照组,但低于SPRINT标准治疗组;(2)在收缩压<140的第一组至第三组中,收缩压值与SPRINT强化治疗组相差<3毫米汞柱。SPRINT试验结果表明,当治疗后的收缩压<130时,尤其是对于类似SPRINT试验的亚组,治疗应持续而不是减少。此外,提高收缩压<140的接受治疗的成年人的比例,在不降低治疗目标的情况下,可接近SPRINT强化治疗的收缩压水平。