Mo Xiao-Dong, Tang Bao-Lin, Zhang Xiao-Hui, Zheng Chang-Cheng, Xu Lan-Ping, Zhu Xiao-Yu, Wang Yu, Liu Hui-Lan, Yan Chen-Hua, Chu Xian-Deng, Chen Huan, Geng Liang-Quan, Liu Kai-Yan, Sun Zi-Min, Huang Xiao-Jun
Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China.
Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China.
Int J Cancer. 2016 Nov 1;139(9):2106-15. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30249. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is an effective therapy for children with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-haploidentical HSCT (haplo-HSCT) or umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT) are both important alternative sources of stem cells for those without an HLA-identical sibling donor or unrelated matched donor. We aimed to compare the therapeutic effects of single UCBT and unmanipulated haplo-HSCT in high-risk ALL children (n = 129). Hematopoietic recovery was significantly faster in haplo-HSCT recipients than in UCBT recipients. The 2-year cumulative incidences of relapse in the haplo-HSCT and UCBT groups were 16.1% and 24.1%, respectively (p = 0.169). The 2-year cumulative incidences of non-relapse mortality in the haplo-HSCT and UCBT groups were 12.8% and 18.8%, respectively (p = 0.277). The 2-year probabilities of overall survival in the haplo-HSCT and UCBT groups were 82.0% and 69.6%, respectively (p = 0.071), and the 2-year probability of disease-free survival in the haplo-HSCT group was higher than in the UCBT group (71.0% vs. 57.2%, p = 0.040). However, several variables (such as leukocyte count and cytogenetics at diagnosis) were different between the groups, and a possible center effect should also be considered. In addition, only mild and moderate chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was associated with significantly improved survival compared to those without chronic GVHD in multivariate analysis. Thus, our results show that both unmanipulated haplo-HSCT and UCBT are valid for high-risk ALL children lacking a HLA matched donor, and both strategies expand the donor pool for children in need.
异基因造血干细胞移植(HSCT)是治疗高危急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)患儿的有效方法。对于没有 HLA 全相合同胞供者或无关匹配供者的患者,人类白细胞抗原(HLA)单倍体相合 HSCT(单倍体 HSCT)或脐带血移植(UCBT)都是重要的干细胞替代来源。我们旨在比较单份 UCBT 和未处理的单倍体 HSCT 对高危 ALL 患儿(n = 129)的治疗效果。单倍体 HSCT 受者的造血恢复明显快于 UCBT 受者。单倍体 HSCT 组和 UCBT 组的 2 年累积复发率分别为 16.1%和 24.1%(p = 0.169)。单倍体 HSCT 组和 UCBT 组的 2 年累积非复发死亡率分别为 12.8%和 18.8%(p = 0.277)。单倍体 HSCT 组和 UCBT 组 的 2 年总生存率分别为 82.0%和 69.6%(p = 0.071),单倍体 HSCT 组的 2 年无病生存率高于 UCBT 组(71.0%对 57.2%,p = 0.040)。然而,两组之间存在几个变量差异(如诊断时的白细胞计数和细胞遗传学),并且还应考虑可能的中心效应。此外,在多变量分析中,与没有慢性移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)的患者相比,只有轻度和中度慢性 GVHD 与生存率显著提高相关。因此,我们的结果表明,未处理的单倍体 HSCT 和 UCBT 对缺乏 HLA 匹配供者的高危 ALL 患儿均有效,这两种策略都扩大了有需要儿童的供者库。