Vanegas Diana, Niño-Quiroga Laura, Chaparro Mauricio, Camacho-Rodríguez Bernardo, Estupiñán Marcela, Perdomo-Arciniegas Ana-María
Cord Blood Bank, Instituto Distrital de Ciencia, Biotecnología e Innovación en Salud, Bogota, Colombia.
Unidad de Trasplante, Fundación HOMI-Hospital de la Misericordia, Bogota, Colombia.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Oct 28;8:749810. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.749810. eCollection 2021.
Unrelated umbilical cord blood (UCB) and haploidentical grafts have been used for allogeneic hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) transplantation in patients without a related or non-related human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched donor. The less stringent HLA-matching requirement in both sources raises an important possibility for patients in need of urgent transplantation to treat any hematological disease. Selection of the best alternative donor is a difficult task that will depend on donor criteria, center experience, patient disease conditions, and risk, among others. Most comparisons available in scientific publications between both graft sources are obtained from retrospective analysis in wide time windows and a heterogeneous number of patients, types of disease, disease stages, previous treatments, graft source, conditioning regimen, graft vs. host disease (GVHD) approach, and evaluable endpoints. There is also an evident impact of the economic traits since low-income countries must consider less expensive treatments to satisfy the needs of the patients in the most effective possible path. Therefore, haploidentical transplantation could be an appealing option, even though it has not been completely established if any chronic treatment derived from the procedure could become a higher cost. In Colombia, there is a huge experience in UCB transplantation especially in units of pediatric transplantation where benign indications are more common than in adults. Due to the availability of a public UCB bank and HLA high-resolution typing in Colombia, there is a wider inventory of cord blood donors. Unfortunately, we do not have an unrelated bone marrow donor registry, so UCB is an important source along with haploidentical transplantation to consider in decision-making. This minireview focuses on comparing the main issues associated with the use of both HSCP sources and provides tools for physicians who face the difficult decision between these alternative donor sources.
在没有匹配的相关或无关人类白细胞抗原(HLA)供体的患者中,不相关脐带血(UCB)和单倍体移植已用于异基因造血干细胞和祖细胞(HSPC)移植。这两种来源中对HLA匹配要求不那么严格,为急需移植以治疗任何血液疾病的患者带来了重要可能性。选择最佳替代供体是一项艰巨任务,这将取决于供体标准、中心经验、患者疾病状况和风险等因素。科学出版物中关于这两种移植物来源的大多数比较是通过对广泛时间窗口内以及数量各异的患者、疾病类型、疾病阶段、既往治疗、移植物来源、预处理方案、移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)处理方法和可评估终点进行回顾性分析获得的。经济因素也有明显影响,因为低收入国家必须考虑成本较低的治疗方法,以尽可能有效地满足患者需求。因此,单倍体移植可能是一个有吸引力的选择,尽管如果该手术产生的任何长期治疗成本更高,单倍体移植是否可行尚未完全确定。在哥伦比亚,UCB移植有丰富经验,特别是在儿科移植单位,那里良性适应症比成人中更常见。由于哥伦比亚有公共UCB库和HLA高分辨率分型,脐带血供体库存更广泛。不幸的是,我们没有无关骨髓供体登记处,所以在决策时,UCB是与单倍体移植一起需要考虑的重要来源。本综述聚焦于比较与使用这两种HSCP来源相关的主要问题,并为面临这两种替代供体来源艰难决策的医生提供工具。