Shah Sanjiv J, Kitzman Dalane W, Borlaug Barry A, van Heerebeek Loek, Zile Michael R, Kass David A, Paulus Walter J
From Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, and the Feinberg Cardiovascular Research Institute, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL (S.J.S.); Sections on Cardiovascular Medicine and Geriatrics, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (D.W.K.); Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, (B.A.B.); Department of Physiology, Institute for Cardiovascular Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (L.v.H., W.J.P.); Department of Cardiology, Onze Lieve Vrouw Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (L.v.H.); Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) and the RHJ Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Charleston (M.R.Z.); and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD (D.A.K.).
Circulation. 2016 Jul 5;134(1):73-90. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.021884.
Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (EF; HFpEF) accounts for 50% of HF cases, and its prevalence relative to HF with reduced EF continues to rise. In contrast to HF with reduced EF, large trials testing neurohumoral inhibition in HFpEF failed to reach a positive outcome. This failure was recently attributed to distinct systemic and myocardial signaling in HFpEF and to diversity of HFpEF phenotypes. In this review, an HFpEF treatment strategy is proposed that addresses HFpEF-specific signaling and phenotypic diversity. In HFpEF, extracardiac comorbidities such as metabolic risk, arterial hypertension, and renal insufficiency drive left ventricular remodeling and dysfunction through systemic inflammation and coronary microvascular endothelial dysfunction. The latter affects left ventricular diastolic dysfunction through macrophage infiltration, resulting in interstitial fibrosis, and through altered paracrine signaling to cardiomyocytes, which become hypertrophied and stiff because of low nitric oxide and cyclic guanosine monophosphate. Systemic inflammation also affects other organs such as lungs, skeletal muscle, and kidneys, leading, respectively, to pulmonary hypertension, muscle weakness, and sodium retention. Individual steps of these signaling cascades can be targeted by specific interventions: metabolic risk by caloric restriction, systemic inflammation by statins, pulmonary hypertension by phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors, muscle weakness by exercise training, sodium retention by diuretics and monitoring devices, myocardial nitric oxide bioavailability by inorganic nitrate-nitrite, myocardial cyclic guanosine monophosphate content by neprilysin or phosphodiesterase 9 inhibition, and myocardial fibrosis by spironolactone. Because of phenotypic diversity in HFpEF, personalized therapeutic strategies are proposed, which are configured in a matrix with HFpEF presentations in the abscissa and HFpEF predispositions in the ordinate.
射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)占心力衰竭病例的50%,且其相对于射血分数降低的心力衰竭的患病率持续上升。与射血分数降低的心力衰竭不同,在HFpEF中测试神经体液抑制的大型试验未能取得阳性结果。这种失败最近归因于HFpEF中独特的全身和心肌信号传导以及HFpEF表型的多样性。在本综述中,提出了一种针对HFpEF特异性信号传导和表型多样性的HFpEF治疗策略。在HFpEF中,心外合并症如代谢风险、动脉高血压和肾功能不全通过全身炎症和冠状动脉微血管内皮功能障碍驱动左心室重构和功能障碍。后者通过巨噬细胞浸润影响左心室舒张功能障碍,导致间质纤维化,并通过改变对心肌细胞的旁分泌信号传导,由于一氧化氮和环磷酸鸟苷水平低,心肌细胞变得肥大和僵硬。全身炎症还影响其他器官,如肺、骨骼肌和肾脏,分别导致肺动脉高压、肌肉无力和钠潴留。这些信号级联反应的各个步骤可以通过特定干预措施来靶向:通过热量限制控制代谢风险,通过他汀类药物控制全身炎症,通过磷酸二酯酶5抑制剂控制肺动脉高压,通过运动训练控制肌肉无力,通过利尿剂和监测装置控制钠潴留,通过无机硝酸盐-亚硝酸盐提高心肌一氧化氮生物利用度,并通过抑制中性肽链内切酶或磷酸二酯酶9提高心肌环磷酸鸟苷含量,通过螺内酯控制心肌纤维化。由于HFpEF存在表型多样性,因此提出了个性化治疗策略,该策略以横坐标为HFpEF表现、纵坐标为HFpEF易患因素构成矩阵。