Stanley Whitney A, Brunner Huber Larissa R, Laditka Sarah B, Racine Elizabeth F
Department of Public Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Boulevard, Charlotte, NC 28223; phone: 704-687-8719; fax: 704-687-1644.
Afr Health Sci. 2016 Mar;16(1):1-9. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v16i1.1.
To examine the association between type of birth attendant and place of delivery, and infant mortality (IM).
This cross-sectional study used self-reported data from the Demographic Health Surveys for women in Ghana, Kenya, and Sierra Leone. Logistic regression estimated odds ratios (ORs) and95% confidence intervals.
In Ghana and Sierra Leone, odds of IM were higher for women who delivered at a health facility versus women who delivered at a household residence (OR=3.18, 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.29-7.83, p=0.01 and OR=1.62, 95% CI: 1.15-2.28, p=0.01, respectively). Compared to the use of health professionals, the use of birth attendants for assistance with delivery was not significantly associated with IM for women in Ghana or Sierra Leone (OR=2.17, 95% CI: 0.83-5.69, p=0.12 and OR=1.25, 95% CI: 0.92-1.70, p=0.15, respectively). In Kenya, odds of IM, though nonsignificant, were lower for women who used birth attendants than those who used health professionals to assist with delivery (OR=0.85, 95% CI: 0.51-1.41, p=0.46), and higher with delivery at a health facility versus a household residence (OR=1.29, 95% CI: 0.81-2.03, p=0.28).
Women in Ghana and Sierra Leone who delivered at a health facility had statistically significant increased odds of IM. Birth attendant type-IM associations were not statistically significant.Future research should consider culturally-sensitive interventions to improve maternal health and help reduce IM.
研究接生人员类型与分娩地点和婴儿死亡率(IM)之间的关联。
这项横断面研究使用了来自加纳、肯尼亚和塞拉利昂女性人口健康调查的自我报告数据。逻辑回归估计比值比(OR)和95%置信区间。
在加纳和塞拉利昂,在医疗机构分娩的女性的IM几率高于在家中分娩的女性(OR分别为3.18,95%置信区间[CI]:1.29 - 7.83,p = 0.01;以及OR = 1.62,95% CI:1.15 - 2.28,p = 0.01)。与使用卫生专业人员相比,在加纳或塞拉利昂,女性分娩时使用接生人员协助与IM无显著关联(OR分别为2.17,95% CI:0.83 - 5.69,p = 0.12;以及OR = 1.25,95% CI:0.92 - 1.70,p = 0.15)。在肯尼亚,使用接生人员协助分娩的女性的IM几率虽然不显著,但低于使用卫生专业人员协助分娩的女性(OR = 0.85,95% CI:0.51 - 1.41,p = 0.46),且在医疗机构分娩的IM几率高于在家中分娩(OR = 1.29,95% CI:0.81 - 2.03,p = 0.28)。
在加纳和塞拉利昂,在医疗机构分娩的女性的IM几率在统计学上显著增加。接生人员类型与IM之间的关联无统计学意义。未来的研究应考虑采用具有文化敏感性的干预措施来改善孕产妇健康并帮助降低IM。