Ludwig Meryl, Hymes Robert A, Schulman Jeff, Pitta Michael, Ramsey Lolita
Orthopedics. 2016 Sep 1;39(5):e931-6. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20160623-08. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
Tibia fracture is the most common type of long bone fracture, and intramedullary nailing is the preferred treatment. In open fractures, a provisional plate is often used to maintain reduction. It is unknown whether this practice increases the risk of infection or other complications. This study retrospectively compared patients who were treated at a level 1 trauma center with intramedullary nailing of an open tibia fracture. Patients who were included: (1) were 18 years or older; (2) were treated between January 1, 2005, and June 30, 2013; (3) had an open fracture of the tibia; and (4) were treated operatively with intramedullary nailing, with or without provisional plate fixation. Patient sex, history of diabetes, history of smoking, mechanism of injury, and side of injury were analyzed. Postoperative complications included infection, delayed union or non-union, compartment syndrome, and death. After the authors controlled for age, Gustilo-Anderson type, and AO/Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, they found that provisional plate use did not significantly increase the risk of infection (adjusted odds ratio, 1.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.51-5.32; P=.41) or any other complications (adjusted odds ratio, 1.24; 95% confidence interval, 0.46-3.35; P=.67). In the subgroup of patients who had a provisional plate (n=35), removal of the plate did not significantly decrease the risk of infection (adjusted odds ratio, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.07-2.69; P=.36) or other complications (adjusted odds ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.12-2.46; P=.44). In open tibia fractures treated with intramedullary nailing, provisional plate stabilization, a valuable reduction aid, did not increase the risk of infection or other complications. Because of the small subgroup size, however, definitive conclusions cannot be drawn about removal of these provisional plates. [Orthopedics. 2016; 39(5):e931-e936.].
胫骨骨折是最常见的长骨骨折类型,髓内钉固定是首选的治疗方法。在开放性骨折中,常使用临时钢板来维持复位。这种做法是否会增加感染或其他并发症的风险尚不清楚。本研究回顾性比较了在一级创伤中心接受开放性胫骨骨折髓内钉固定治疗的患者。纳入的患者:(1)年龄在18岁及以上;(2)在2005年1月1日至2013年6月30日期间接受治疗;(3)患有胫骨开放性骨折;(4)接受了髓内钉固定手术治疗,有无临时钢板固定均可。分析了患者的性别、糖尿病史、吸烟史、损伤机制和损伤部位。术后并发症包括感染、延迟愈合或不愈合、骨筋膜室综合征和死亡。在作者对年龄、Gustilo-Anderson分型和AO/骨创伤协会分类进行控制后,他们发现使用临时钢板并没有显著增加感染风险(调整后的优势比为1.64;95%置信区间为0.51-5.32;P=0.41)或任何其他并发症的风险(调整后的优势比为1.24;95%置信区间为0.46-3.35;P=0.67)。在有临时钢板的患者亚组(n=35)中,取出钢板并没有显著降低感染风险(调整后的优势比为0.43;95%置信区间为0.07-2.69;P=0.36)或其他并发症的风险(调整后的优势比为0.55;95%置信区间为0.12-2.46;P=0.44)。在接受髓内钉固定治疗的开放性胫骨骨折中,临时钢板固定作为一种有价值的复位辅助手段,并没有增加感染或其他并发症的风险。然而,由于亚组规模较小,关于取出这些临时钢板无法得出明确结论。[《骨科》。2016年;39(5):e931-e936。]