• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

泰国成人接触性皮炎患者致敏接触原的模式和危险因素。

Patterns and risk factors of causative contact allergens in Thai adult patients with contact dermatitis.

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2017 Mar;35(1):27-32. doi: 10.12932/AP0757.

DOI:10.12932/AP0757
PMID:27362404
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Surveillance on common allergens identified by patch testing plays an important role in emerging allergen detection, which leads to both individual and societal level prevention.

OBJECTIVE

To study the changes in the pattern of contact sensitization and to identify risk factors associated with allergens.

METHOD

The data of 206 patients who underwent patch testing at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital during 2012 to 2015 were assessed. The associations between patient risk factors and positive reactions to each allergen were evaluated. The results were compared with data from 2003-2004.

RESULTS

The top five most common allergens during 2012-2015 were nickel sulfate (19.4%), methylchloroisothiazolinone/ methylisothiazolinone (MCI/MI) (13.6%), fragrance mix I (FM I) (10.7%), carba mix (9.2%) and cobalt chloride (6.3%) whereas, during 2003-2004, these were nickel sulfate, cobalt chloride, FM I, potassium dichromate and Myroxylon pereirae. A positive patch test to nickel was strongly associated with a history of metal and seafood allergy (p<0.001; OR, 4.94; 95% CI = 2.33-10.47 and p=0.028; OR, 2.55; 95% CI, 1.11-5.85, respectively). MCI/MI was correlated with a history of personal care products allergy, and fragrance was correlated with a history of urticaria (p=0.005; OR, 4.05; 95% CI = 1.54-10.66 and p=0.031; OR, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.10-6.68, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

There was an alteration in the pattern of contact sensitization detected by our standard series. MCI/MI has become the most common preservative causing contact allergy.

摘要

背景

通过斑贴试验对常见过敏原进行监测,对于发现新的过敏原、进行个体和社会层面的预防具有重要作用。

目的

研究接触致敏模式的变化,并确定与过敏原相关的危险因素。

方法

评估了 2012 年至 2015 年在朱拉隆功纪念医院进行斑贴试验的 206 例患者的数据。评估了患者危险因素与每种过敏原阳性反应之间的关联。并将结果与 2003-2004 年的数据进行了比较。

结果

2012-2015 年最常见的五种过敏原依次为硫酸镍(19.4%)、甲基氯异噻唑啉酮/甲基异噻唑啉酮(MCI/MI)(13.6%)、香料混合物 I(FM I)(10.7%)、卡巴混合物(9.2%)和氯化钴(6.3%),而在 2003-2004 年,这些则是硫酸镍、氯化钴、FM I、重铬酸钾和秘鲁香脂。对镍的斑贴试验阳性与金属和海鲜过敏史密切相关(p<0.001;OR,4.94;95%CI=2.33-10.47 和 p=0.028;OR,2.55;95%CI,1.11-5.85)。MCI/MI 与个人护理产品过敏史相关,香料与荨麻疹病史相关(p=0.005;OR,4.05;95%CI=1.54-10.66 和 p=0.031;OR,2.71;95%CI,1.10-6.68)。

结论

我们的标准系列检测到的接触致敏模式发生了变化。MCI/MI 已成为最常见的引起接触过敏的防腐剂。

相似文献

1
Patterns and risk factors of causative contact allergens in Thai adult patients with contact dermatitis.泰国成人接触性皮炎患者致敏接触原的模式和危险因素。
Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2017 Mar;35(1):27-32. doi: 10.12932/AP0757.
2
Time trends of contact allergy to the European baseline series in Lithuania.立陶宛对欧洲基线系列接触性过敏的时间趋势。
Contact Dermatitis. 2017 Jun;76(6):350-356. doi: 10.1111/cod.12726. Epub 2016 Dec 4.
3
Patch test results in 542 patients with suspected contact dermatitis in Turkey.土耳其542例疑似接触性皮炎患者的斑贴试验结果。
Contact Dermatitis. 2002 Jan;46(1):17-23. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2002.460104.x.
4
Result of standard patch test in patients suspected of having allergic contact dermatitis.疑似过敏性接触性皮炎患者的标准斑贴试验结果。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2005 Sep;88 Suppl 4:S177-83.
5
North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results for 2007-2008.2007-2008 年北美接触性皮炎组斑贴试验结果。
Dermatitis. 2013 Jan-Feb;24(1):10-21. doi: 10.1097/DER.0b013e318277ca50.
6
Contact allergy to haptens in the Swedish baseline series: Results from the Swedish Patch Test Register (2010 to 2017).接触原在瑞典基础系列中的过敏反应:来自瑞典斑贴试验登记处(2010 至 2017 年)的结果。
Contact Dermatitis. 2022 Mar;86(3):175-188. doi: 10.1111/cod.13996. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
7
Patch Testing for Methylisothiazolinone and Methylchloroisothiazolinone-Methylisothiazolinone Contact Allergy.甲基异噻唑啉酮和甲基氯异噻唑啉酮-甲基异噻唑啉酮接触过敏的斑贴试验。
JAMA Dermatol. 2016 Jan;152(1):67-72. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.3606.
8
Risk factors for common contact allergens and patch test results using a modified European baseline series in patients tested during between 2000 and 2009 at Siriraj Hospital.在 2000 年至 2009 年间于 Siriraj 医院接受检测的患者中,使用改良的欧洲基本系列进行斑贴试验,以确定常见接触过敏原的危险因素和斑贴试验结果。
Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2014 Mar;32(1):60-5. doi: 10.12932/AP0326.32.1.2014.
9
Trends in Patch Testing With the Mayo Clinic Standard Series, 2011-2015.2011-2015 年梅奥诊所标准系列斑贴试验的趋势。
Dermatitis. 2018 Nov/Dec;29(6):310-315. doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000411.
10
Patch test results of the European baseline series among 1309 patients in Turkey between 2013 and 2019.2013 年至 2019 年期间,在土耳其的 1309 名患者中进行的欧洲基本系列斑贴试验结果。
Contact Dermatitis. 2021 Jan;84(1):15-23. doi: 10.1111/cod.13653. Epub 2020 Aug 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Patch testing in Lao medical students.老挝医学生的斑贴试验。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 16;15(1):e0217192. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217192. eCollection 2020.
2
A seven-year retrospective analysis of patch test data in a cohort of patients with contact dermatitis in Sri Lanka.对斯里兰卡一组接触性皮炎患者斑贴试验数据的七年回顾性分析。
BMC Dermatol. 2019 Jul 10;19(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12895-019-0090-8.
3
Contact Allergy: A Review of Current Problems from a Clinical Perspective.接触过敏:从临床角度看当前问题综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 May 29;15(6):1108. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15061108.