• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对斯里兰卡一组接触性皮炎患者斑贴试验数据的七年回顾性分析。

A seven-year retrospective analysis of patch test data in a cohort of patients with contact dermatitis in Sri Lanka.

作者信息

Keragala B S D P, Herath H M M T B, Keragala T S, Malavi M A M H, Rodrigo Chaturaka, Gunasekera C N

机构信息

National Hospital of Sri Lanka, Colombo, Sri Lanka.

Department of Pathology, School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, 2052, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Dermatol. 2019 Jul 10;19(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12895-019-0090-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12895-019-0090-8
PMID:31291927
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6617664/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patch testing with a baseline series is a common tool employed when the sensitizing agent in contact dermatitis is unclear. However, for Asian countries, there are no locally validated baseline series to utilize in screening.

METHODS

We completed a retrospective analysis of all patients that had undergone patch testing with the European Baseline series, Shoe Series or Comprehensive International Baseline series, over 7 years from 2012 to 2018 in a tertiary care reference dermatology clinic in Sri Lanka to evaluate the suitability of these investigations to identify causes for contact dermatitis in the local study population.

RESULTS

Out of 438 patients tested, 239 (54.8%) reacted to at least one substance in the series. The Shoe Series was significantly more likely to yield a positive result than the European Baseline Series (70.2% vs 46.9%, p < 0.05). The top three sensitizers identified by all series were nickel sulfate (16%, 70/438), p-phenylenediamine (12.3%, 54/438) and 2-mercaptobenzothiazole or mercapto mix (10.5%, 46/438).

CONCLUSION

Shoe series has a comparatively high yield in the local population compared to European Baseline series. Since little less than half of the study population did not have any reactivity to any of the allergens tested it is important to develop or modify and validate a locally relevant, more suitable baseline series which is based on the Shoe Series in Sri Lanka. This is further evidence for the continuously changing nature of allergens in the environment and the need to modify existing patch testing standards accordingly.

摘要

背景

当接触性皮炎的致敏剂不明时,使用基础系列进行斑贴试验是一种常用方法。然而,在亚洲国家,尚无经过本地验证的基础系列可用于筛查。

方法

我们对2012年至2018年7年间在斯里兰卡一家三级医疗参考皮肤科诊所接受欧洲基础系列、鞋类系列或综合国际基础系列斑贴试验的所有患者进行了回顾性分析,以评估这些检测方法在确定当地研究人群接触性皮炎病因方面的适用性。

结果

在438名接受检测的患者中,239名(54.8%)对该系列中的至少一种物质有反应。鞋类系列产生阳性结果的可能性显著高于欧洲基础系列(70.2%对46.9%,p<0.05)。所有系列确定的前三种致敏剂为硫酸镍(16%,70/438)、对苯二胺(12.3%,54/438)和2-巯基苯并噻唑或巯基混合物(10.5%,46/438)。

结论

与欧洲基础系列相比,鞋类系列在当地人群中的阳性率较高。由于不到一半的研究人群对所检测的任何过敏原均无反应,因此开发或修改并验证基于斯里兰卡鞋类系列的、与当地相关且更合适的基础系列非常重要。这进一步证明了环境中过敏原性质的不断变化以及相应修改现有斑贴试验标准的必要性。

相似文献

1
A seven-year retrospective analysis of patch test data in a cohort of patients with contact dermatitis in Sri Lanka.对斯里兰卡一组接触性皮炎患者斑贴试验数据的七年回顾性分析。
BMC Dermatol. 2019 Jul 10;19(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12895-019-0090-8.
2
Patch testing and contact allergens in Ethiopia--results of 514 contact dermatitis patients using the European baseline series.在埃塞俄比亚进行斑贴试验和接触性过敏原检测——使用欧洲基本系列对 514 例接触性皮炎患者的检测结果。
Contact Dermatitis. 2010 Sep;63(3):140-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2010.01740.x.
3
Risk factors for common contact allergens and patch test results using a modified European baseline series in patients tested during between 2000 and 2009 at Siriraj Hospital.在 2000 年至 2009 年间于 Siriraj 医院接受检测的患者中,使用改良的欧洲基本系列进行斑贴试验,以确定常见接触过敏原的危险因素和斑贴试验结果。
Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2014 Mar;32(1):60-5. doi: 10.12932/AP0326.32.1.2014.
4
Evaluation of Patch Test Findings in Patients With Anogenital Dermatitis.肛门生殖器皮炎患者斑贴试验结果评估。
JAMA Dermatol. 2020 Jan 1;156(1):85-91. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.3844.
5
Patch Testing With a New Composition of the Mercapto Mix-A Multicenter Study from the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group.用新的巯基混合物组成进行斑贴试验——来自国际接触性皮炎研究组的一项多中心研究。
Dermatitis. 2021;32(3):160-163. doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000669.
6
A multi-center, retrospective review of patch testing for contact dermatitis in allergy practices.多中心回顾性研究:过敏门诊接触性皮炎斑贴试验。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2011 Dec;107(6):487-92. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2011.09.004. Epub 2011 Oct 5.
7
Patch Testing with a New Composition of Mercapto Mix: A Multi-centre Study by the Swedish Contact Dermatitis Research Group.用新配方的巯基混合物进行斑贴试验:瑞典接触性皮炎研究组的多中心研究。
Acta Derm Venereol. 2019 Oct 1;99(11):960-963. doi: 10.2340/00015555-3249.
8
Pattern of patch test reactivity among patients with clinical diagnosis of contact dermatitis: a hospital-based study.临床诊断为接触性皮炎患者的斑贴试验反应模式:一项基于医院的研究。
Ann Saudi Med. 2012 Jul-Aug;32(4):404-7. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2012.404.
9
Cutaneous delayed-type hypersensitivity in patients with atopic dermatitis.特应性皮炎患者的皮肤迟发型超敏反应。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013 Aug;69(2):232-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2013.03.012. Epub 2013 Apr 11.
10
European Standard Series patch test results from a contact dermatitis clinic in Israel during the 7-year period from 1998 to 2004.1998年至2004年这7年间,以色列一家接触性皮炎诊所的欧洲标准系列斑贴试验结果。
Contact Dermatitis. 2006 Aug;55(2):73-6. doi: 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2006.00875.x.

引用本文的文献

1
A review of patch-test data over the period of eight years in the allergy and immunology department in Qatar.卡塔尔过敏与免疫学系八年期间斑贴试验数据综述。
Qatar Med J. 2023 Nov 19;2023(2):4. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2023.sqac.4. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
The burden of skin disease in the United States.美国的皮肤病负担。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 May;76(5):958-972.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.12.043. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
2
Patterns and risk factors of causative contact allergens in Thai adult patients with contact dermatitis.泰国成人接触性皮炎患者致敏接触原的模式和危险因素。
Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2017 Mar;35(1):27-32. doi: 10.12932/AP0757.
3
European Society of Contact Dermatitis guideline for diagnostic patch testing - recommendations on best practice.欧洲接触性皮炎学会诊断性斑贴试验指南——最佳实践建议。
Contact Dermatitis. 2015 Oct;73(4):195-221. doi: 10.1111/cod.12432. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
4
Risk factors for common contact allergens and patch test results using a modified European baseline series in patients tested during between 2000 and 2009 at Siriraj Hospital.在 2000 年至 2009 年间于 Siriraj 医院接受检测的患者中,使用改良的欧洲基本系列进行斑贴试验,以确定常见接触过敏原的危险因素和斑贴试验结果。
Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2014 Mar;32(1):60-5. doi: 10.12932/AP0326.32.1.2014.
5
European Standard Series patch test results from a contact dermatitis clinic in Israel during the 7-year period from 1998 to 2004.1998年至2004年这7年间,以色列一家接触性皮炎诊所的欧洲标准系列斑贴试验结果。
Contact Dermatitis. 2006 Aug;55(2):73-6. doi: 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2006.00875.x.
6
Patch test results in 542 patients with suspected contact dermatitis in Turkey.土耳其542例疑似接触性皮炎患者的斑贴试验结果。
Contact Dermatitis. 2002 Jan;46(1):17-23. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2002.460104.x.
7
Common contact sensitizers in Chandigarh, India. A study of 200 patients with the European standard series.印度昌迪加尔常见的接触性致敏原。一项针对200例采用欧洲标准系列的患者的研究。
Contact Dermatitis. 1998 Mar;38(3):127-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1998.tb05677.x.
8
Is the European standard series suitable for patch testing in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia?欧洲标准系列是否适用于沙特阿拉伯利雅得的斑贴试验?
Contact Dermatitis. 1995 Nov;33(5):310-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1995.tb02044.x.
9
Patch testing with the European standard series in Shanghai.在上海使用欧洲标准系列进行斑贴试验。
Contact Dermatitis. 1994 Mar;30(3):173-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1994.tb00701.x.
10
Patch testing in cases of eczema and dermatitis in Beijing, China.中国北京湿疹和皮炎病例的斑贴试验。
Contact Dermatitis. 1991 Oct;25(4):224-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1991.tb01849.x.