• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

气动管道系统传输对常规评估的脑脊液参数及分光光度法测定的脑脊液参数的影响

Influence of pneumatic tube system transport on routinely assessed and spectrophotometric cerebrospinal fluid parameters.

作者信息

Broz Pavel, Rajdl Daniel, Racek Jaroslav, Zenkova Jana, Petrikova Vlasta

出版信息

Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017 Jan 1;55(1):47-52. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2016-0143.

DOI:10.1515/cclm-2016-0143
PMID:27362961
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pneumatic tube systems (PTS) are widely used in many hospitals. Using PTS reduces turnaround time (TAT) and can improve patients' outcome.

METHODS

We investigated whether clinically significant differences could be observed in CSF samples transported by pneumatic tube in comparison with samples transported by hand. Two aliquots from one sample were sent by PTS and by hand from the department of neurology or neurosurgery and compared.

RESULTS

Routine cytological and biochemical assessment was compared in 27 cases. There were no statistically significant changes (transport by hand vs. PTS) in glucose levels [data are expressed as median (minimum-maximum)] at 3.7 (2.5-8.6) mmol/L vs. 3.6 (2.7-8.6) mmol/L, p=0.96 or lactate levels at 1.8 mmol/L (1.1-5.5) vs. 1.8 mmol/L (1.1-5.4). We observed a statistically significant decline in total protein levels in samples transported by PTS at 0.56 g/L (0.19-4.29) vs. 0.49 g/L (0.18-4.3), p=0.008. We observed no changes in erythrocyte count at 5/μL (0-40,000) vs. 5/μL (0-40,106), mononuclear cells at 2/μL (1-145) vs. 3/μL (1-152), or polynuclear cells at 0/μL (0-235) vs. 0/μL (0-352). Spectrophotometric examination was performed in 20 cases. There were no statistically significant differences (transport by hand vs. transport by PTS) in NOA at 0.002 (0.001-1.537) vs. 0.001 (0.001-1.528), p=0.95 or NBA at 0.001 (0.001-0.231) vs. 0.001 (0.001-0.276), p=0.675. Samples transported by PTS were delivered faster than samples transported by courier (transport by hand vs. PTS) at 25 min (10-153) vs. 15 min (4-110), p=0.002.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no significant changes in glucose, lactate levels and in any of the cytological parameters assessed, nor were statistically significant changes observed in the spectrophotometric parameters. We found a statistically significant decrease in total protein levels in samples transported by PTS. Transport by PTS can be faster than transport by hand.

摘要

背景

气动管道系统(PTS)在许多医院中广泛使用。使用PTS可缩短周转时间(TAT)并改善患者预后。

方法

我们调查了与手工运送的样本相比,通过气动管道运送的脑脊液样本中是否能观察到具有临床意义的差异。将来自一个样本的两份等分试样分别通过PTS和由神经内科或神经外科手工运送并进行比较。

结果

对27例病例的常规细胞学和生化评估进行了比较。葡萄糖水平[数据以中位数(最小值 - 最大值)表示]在手工运送组为3.7(2.5 - 8.6)mmol/L,在PTS运送组为3.6(2.7 - 8.6)mmol/L,p = 0.96;乳酸水平在手工运送组为1.8 mmol/L(1.1 - 5.5),在PTS运送组为1.8 mmol/L(1.1 - 5.4),两组间均无统计学显著变化。我们观察到PTS运送的样本中总蛋白水平有统计学显著下降,分别为0.56 g/L(0.19 - 4.29)和0.49 g/L(0.18 - 4.3),p = 0.008。红细胞计数在手工运送组为5/μL(0 - 40,000),在PTS运送组为5/μL(0 - 40,106);单核细胞计数在手工运送组为2/μL(1 - 145),在PTS运送组为3/μL(1 - 152);多核细胞计数在手工运送组为0/μL(0 - 235),在PTS运送组为0/μL(0 - 352),均未观察到变化。对20例病例进行了分光光度检查。在一氧化氮(NOA)方面,手工运送组为0.002(0.001 - 1.537),PTS运送组为0.001(0.001 - 1.528),p = 0.95;在神经氨酸酶(NBA)方面,手工运送组为0.001(0.001 - 0.231),PTS运送组为0.001(0.001 - 0.276),p = 0.675,两组间均无统计学显著差异。PTS运送的样本比快递运送的样本(手工运送与PTS运送)更快送达,分别为25分钟(10 - 153)和15分钟(4 - 110),p = 0.002。

结论

我们发现葡萄糖、乳酸水平以及所评估的任何细胞学参数均无显著变化,分光光度参数也未观察到统计学显著变化。我们发现PTS运送的样本中总蛋白水平有统计学显著下降。PTS运送比手工运送更快。

相似文献

1
Influence of pneumatic tube system transport on routinely assessed and spectrophotometric cerebrospinal fluid parameters.气动管道系统传输对常规评估的脑脊液参数及分光光度法测定的脑脊液参数的影响
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017 Jan 1;55(1):47-52. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2016-0143.
2
Preanalytical influence of pneumatic tube delivery system on results of routine biochemistry and haematology analysis.气动管道传输系统对常规生化和血液学分析结果的分析前影响。
Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 2017 Dec 1;75(6):703-712. doi: 10.1684/abc.2017.1287.
3
The Effect of Pneumatic Tube Systems on the Hemolysis of Biochemistry Blood Samples.气动管道系统对生化血液样本溶血的影响。
J Emerg Nurs. 2017 May;43(3):255-258. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2016.09.007. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
4
Smartphone Application Monitoring of Acceleration Forces During Pneumatic Tube System Transport of Emergency Department Patient Samples.智能手机应用程序监测急诊科患者样本在气动管道系统运输过程中的加速力。
Clin Lab. 2018 Jul 1;64(7):1297-1304. doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2018.180325.
5
Effect of pneumatic tube transport on T lymphocyte subsets analysis.气动管道传输对T淋巴细胞亚群分析的影响。
Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2015 Nov-Dec;88(6):371-4. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.21231. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
6
Smartphone monitoring of pneumatic tube system-induced sample hemolysis.智能手机监测气动输送管系统引起的样本溶血。
Clin Chim Acta. 2016 Nov 1;462:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2016.08.011. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
7
Air bubbles and hemolysis of blood samples during transport by pneumatic tube systems.在使用气动输送管系统运输过程中,血液样本中的气泡和溶血问题。
Clin Chim Acta. 2017 Oct;473:9-13. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2017.08.008. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
8
Impact of a pneumatic tube system transport on hemostasis parameters measurement: the experiment of Cochin universitary hospital (AP-HP, Paris, France).气动管道系统运输对止血参数测量的影响:法国巴黎阿维坎综合医院科钦大学医院的实验
Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 2017 Feb 1;75(1):93-100. doi: 10.1684/abc.2016.1215.
9
The Effects of Sample Transport by Pneumatic Tube System on Routine Hematology and Coagulation Tests.气动管道系统样本运输对常规血液学和凝血检测的影响
Adv Hematol. 2018 Jul 2;2018:6940152. doi: 10.1155/2018/6940152. eCollection 2018.
10
Pre-analytical effects of pneumatic tube system transport on routine haematology and coagulation tests, global coagulation assays and platelet function assays.气动输送管系统对常规血液学和凝血测试、全血凝血检测以及血小板功能检测的分析前影响。
Thromb Res. 2017 May;153:7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2016.12.022. Epub 2016 Dec 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Author reply to "reporting standards for cerebrospinal fluid studies: more transparency of laboratory data is needed" by JL Frater.
Infection. 2024 Apr;52(2):697-698. doi: 10.1007/s15010-023-02134-4. Epub 2023 Nov 10.