Lavers Jennifer L, Oppel Steffen, Bond Alexander L
RSPB Centre for Conservation Science, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, The Lodge, Sandy, Bedfordshire, SG19 2DL, United Kingdom; Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, 20 Castray Esplanade, Battery Point, Tasmania, 7004, Australia.
RSPB Centre for Conservation Science, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, The Lodge, Sandy, Bedfordshire, SG19 2DL, United Kingdom.
Mar Environ Res. 2016 Aug;119:245-51. doi: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2016.06.009. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
Marine plastic pollution is a global problem with considerable ecological and economic consequences. Quantifying the amount of plastic in the ocean has been facilitated by surveys of accumulated plastic on beaches, but existing monitoring programmes assume the proportion of plastic detected during beach surveys is constant across time and space. Here we use a multi-observer experiment to assess what proportion of small plastic fragments is missed routinely by observers, and what factors influence the detection probability of different types of plastic. Detection probability across the various types of plastic ranged from 60 to 100%, and varied considerably by observer, observer experience, and biological material present on the beach that could be confused with plastic. Blue fragments had the highest detection probability, while white fragments had the lowest. We recommend long-term monitoring programmes adopt survey designs accounting for imperfect detection or at least assess the proportion of fragments missed by observers.
海洋塑料污染是一个全球性问题,具有重大的生态和经济后果。对海滩上累积塑料的调查有助于量化海洋中的塑料数量,但现有的监测计划假定在海滩调查中检测到的塑料比例在时间和空间上是恒定的。在这里,我们通过一项多观察者实验来评估观察者通常会遗漏的小塑料碎片比例,以及哪些因素会影响不同类型塑料的检测概率。各类塑料的检测概率在60%至100%之间,并且因观察者、观察者经验以及海滩上可能与塑料混淆的生物材料而有很大差异。蓝色碎片的检测概率最高,而白色碎片的检测概率最低。我们建议长期监测计划采用考虑到检测不完美的调查设计,或者至少评估观察者遗漏的碎片比例。