Suppr超能文献

处理元音和声调的时间进程:朗读泰语单词

The Time Course for Processing Vowels and Lexical Tones: Reading Aloud Thai Words.

作者信息

Davis Chris, Schoknecht Colin, Kim Jeesun, Burnham Denis

出版信息

Lang Speech. 2016 Jun;59(Pt 2):196-218. doi: 10.1177/0023830915586033.

Abstract

Three naming aloud experiments and a lexical decision (LD) experiment used masked priming to index the processing of written Thai vowels and tones. Thai allows for manipulation of the mapping between orthography and phonology not possible in other orthographies, for example, the use of consonants, vowels and tone markers in both horizontal and vertical orthographic positions (HOPs and VOPs). Experiment I showed that changing a vowel between prime and target slowed down target naming but changing a tone mark did not. Experiment I used an across item-design and a different number of HOPs in the way vowels and tones were specified. Experiment 2 used a within-item design and tested vowel and tone changes for both 2-HOP and 3-HOP targets separately. The 3-HOP words showed the same tone and vowel change effect as Experiment 1, whereas 2-HOP items did not. It was speculated that the 2-HOP result was due to the variable position of the vowel affecting priming. Experiment 3 employed a more stringent control over the 2-HOP vowel and tone items and found priming for the tone changes but not for vowel changes. The final experiment retested the items from Experiment 3 with the LD task and found no priming for the tone change items, indicating that the tone effect in Experiment 3 was due to processes involved in naming aloud. In all, the results supported the view that for naming a word, the development of tone information is slower than vowel information.

摘要

三项大声朗读实验和一项词汇判断(LD)实验使用掩蔽启动来索引泰文书面元音和声调的加工过程。泰文允许对正字法和音系学之间的映射进行操作,而这在其他正字法中是不可能的,例如,在水平和垂直正字位置(HOPs和VOPs)中使用辅音、元音和声调标记。实验一表明,在启动项和目标项之间改变元音会减慢目标命名的速度,但改变声调标记则不会。实验一采用了跨项目设计,并且在指定元音和声调的方式上使用了不同数量的HOPs。实验二采用了项目内设计,并分别测试了2-HOP和3-HOP目标的元音和声调变化。3-HOP单词表现出与实验一相同的声调及元音变化效应,而2-HOP项目则没有。据推测,2-HOP的结果是由于元音位置的变化影响了启动。实验三对2-HOP元音和声调项目进行了更严格的控制,发现了声调变化的启动效应,但没有发现元音变化的启动效应。最后一个实验用LD任务对实验三的项目进行了重新测试,没有发现声调变化项目的启动效应,这表明实验三中的声调效应是由于大声朗读过程中涉及的加工过程。总的来说,结果支持了这样一种观点,即对于单词命名,声调信息的发展比元音信息要慢。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验