Grue Jan
Department of Sociology, University of Oslo, Norway.
Sociol Health Illn. 2016 Jul;38(6):957-64. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12417. Epub 2016 Mar 28.
As disability becomes an ever more salient concept in international political and legal discourse, its social meaning must be better understood. Traditionally defined in medical terms and as an individual problem, it has for the last several decades increasingly become a socio-politically defined phenomenon. Disability pride has emerged as a social movement patterned after ethnic minority and sexual orientation movements. The one billion people who count as disabled nevertheless have illnesses and impairments that are largely understood as medical problems. Medicine continues to exert great influence on the social meaning of disability in general and the social valuation of various illnesses and impairments in particular. Whereas specific conditions may be socially valued, the overall category and label of disability connotes marginality and stigma. Under these conditions, disability policy, which ought to be a universal concern, risks being construed as a marginal and special-interest issue rather than a broadly relevant topic; this has potentially negative consequences for the majority of disabled people.
随着残疾在国际政治和法律话语中成为一个日益突出的概念,其社会意义必须得到更好的理解。传统上,残疾是从医学角度定义的,被视为个人问题,但在过去几十年里,它越来越成为一种由社会政治定义的现象。残疾自豪感已成为一场效仿少数族裔和性取向运动的社会运动。然而,被算作残疾的十亿人所患的疾病和损伤在很大程度上仍被视为医学问题。医学继续对残疾的社会意义,特别是对各种疾病和损伤的社会评价产生巨大影响。虽然某些特定情况可能会得到社会重视,但残疾这一总体类别和标签却意味着边缘化和耻辱。在这种情况下,本应受到普遍关注的残疾政策有被视为边缘性特殊利益问题而非广泛相关议题的风险;这可能会给大多数残疾人带来负面影响。