Haider Sandra, Luger Eva, Kapan Ali, Titze Sylvia, Lackinger Christian, Schindler Karin E, Dorner Thomas E
Centre for Public Health, Institute of Social Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 15/1, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Institute of Sport Science, University of Graz, Mozartgasse 14/I, 8010, Graz, Austria.
Qual Life Res. 2016 Dec;25(12):3129-3138. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1349-8. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
The aim of this study was to examine the associations between daily physical activity (DPA), handgrip strength, appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASMM) and physical performance (balance, gait speed, chair stands) with quality of life in prefrail and frail community-dwelling older adults.
Prefrail and frail individuals were included, as determined by SHARE-FI. Quality of life (QoL) was measured with WHOQOL-BREF and WHOQOL-OLD, DPA with PASE, handgrip strength with a dynamometer, ASMM with bioelectrical impedance analysis and physical performance with the SPPB test. Linear regression models adjusted for sex and age were developed: In model 1, the associations between each independent variable and QoL were assessed separately; in model 2, all the independent variables were included simultaneously.
Eighty-three participants with a mean age of 83 (SD: 8) years were analysed. Model 1: DPA (ß = 0.315), handgrip strength (ß = 0.292) and balance (ß = 0.178) were significantly associated with 'overall QoL'. Balance was related to the QoL domains of 'physical health' (ß = 0.371), 'psychological health' (ß = 0.236), 'environment' (ß = 0.253), 'autonomy' (ß = 0.276) and 'social participation' (ß = 0.518). Gait speed (ß = 0.381) and chair stands (ß = 0.282) were associated with 'social participation' only. ASMM was not related to QoL. Model 2: independent variables explained 'overall QoL' (R = 0.309), 'physical health' (R = 0.200), 'autonomy' (R = 0.247) and 'social participation' (R = 0.356), among which balance was the strongest indicator.
ASMM did not play a role in the QoL context of the prefrail and frail older adults, whereas balance and DPA were relevant. These parameters were particularly associated with 'social participation' and 'autonomy'.
本研究旨在探讨日常身体活动(DPA)、握力、四肢骨骼肌质量(ASMM)和身体机能(平衡能力、步速、从椅子上站起的能力)与社区中身体虚弱及衰弱的老年人生活质量之间的关联。
纳入由SHARE-FI评估确定的身体虚弱及衰弱个体。生活质量(QoL)采用世界卫生组织生活质量简表(WHOQOL-BREF)和世界卫生组织老年生活质量量表(WHOQOL-OLD)进行测量,DPA采用老年人身体活动量表(PASE)测量,握力使用测力计测量,ASMM采用生物电阻抗分析测量,身体机能采用简短体能状况量表(SPPB)测试。建立了经性别和年龄调整的线性回归模型:在模型1中,分别评估每个自变量与生活质量之间的关联;在模型2中,同时纳入所有自变量。
对83名平均年龄为83岁(标准差:8岁)的参与者进行了分析。模型1:DPA(β = 0.315)、握力(β = 0.292)和平衡能力(β = 0.178)与“总体生活质量”显著相关。平衡能力与“身体健康”(β = 0.371)、“心理健康”(β = 0.236)、“环境”(β = 0.253)、“自主性”(β = 0.276)和“社会参与”(β = 0.518)等生活质量领域相关。步速(β = 0.381)和从椅子上站起的能力(β = 0.282)仅与“社会参与”相关。ASMM与生活质量无关。模型2:自变量解释了“总体生活质量”(R = 0.309)、“身体健康”(R = 0.200)、“自主性”(R = 0.247)和“社会参与”(R = 0.356),其中平衡能力是最强的指标。
在身体虚弱及衰弱的老年人生活质量方面,ASMM未发挥作用,而平衡能力和DPA与之相关。这些参数尤其与“社会参与”和“自主性”相关。