• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A Comprehensive View of Frequent Emergency Department Users Based on Data from a Regional HIE.基于区域卫生信息交换(HIE)数据对急诊科频繁使用者的综合观察
South Med J. 2016 Jul;109(7):434-9. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000488.
2
When Should ED Physicians Use an HIE? Predicting Presence of Patient Data in an HIE.急诊医生应何时使用健康信息交换(HIE)?预测患者数据在HIE中的存在情况。
South Med J. 2016 Jul;109(7):427-33. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000490.
3
Increased Identification of Emergency Department 72-hour Returns Using Multihospital Health Information Exchange.利用多医院健康信息交换提高急诊科72小时复诊的识别率。
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 May;23(5):645-9. doi: 10.1111/acem.12954. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
4
Characteristics and predictors of adult frequent emergency department users in the United States: A systematic literature review.美国成年高频急诊患者的特征和预测因素:系统文献回顾。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2019 Jun;25(3):420-433. doi: 10.1111/jep.13137. Epub 2019 May 2.
5
Health Information Exchange in the ED: What Do ED Clinicians Think?急诊科的健康信息交换:急诊科临床医生怎么看?
South Med J. 2016 Jul;109(7):419-26. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000466.
6
Factors influencing infant visits to emergency departments.影响婴儿前往急诊科就诊的因素。
Pediatrics. 2000 Nov;106(5):1031-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.106.5.1031.
7
Impact of a health information exchange on resource use and Medicare-allowable reimbursements at 11 emergency departments in a midsized city.健康信息交换对一个中等城市11家急诊科资源使用及医疗保险可报销费用的影响。
West J Emerg Med. 2014 Nov;15(7):777-85. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2014.9.21311. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
8
Health information exchange improves identification of frequent emergency department users.健康信息交换可改善对频繁使用急诊部患者的识别。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Dec;32(12):2193-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0167.
9
Characterizing pediatric high frequency users of California emergency departments.描述加利福尼亚州急诊科高频使用的儿科患者。
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Sep;37(9):1699-1704. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.12.015. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
10
Automated linking of free-text complaints to reason-for-visit categories and International Classification of Diseases diagnoses in emergency department patient record databases.在急诊科患者记录数据库中,将自由文本投诉自动链接到就诊原因类别和国际疾病分类诊断。
Ann Emerg Med. 2004 Mar;43(3):401-9. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(03)00748-0.

引用本文的文献

1
A mapping review of interventions to address patients who frequently seek care in the emergency department.针对频繁到急诊科就诊的患者的干预措施的映射回顾。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Mar 27;24(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-00970-7.
2
An analysis of social determinants of health and structural competency training in global emergency medicine fellowship programs in the United States.美国全球急诊医学住院医师培训项目中的健康社会决定因素及结构胜任力培训分析
AEM Educ Train. 2021 Sep 29;5(Suppl 1):S28-S32. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10660. eCollection 2021 Sep.
3
Characterization of high healthcare utilizer groups using administrative data from an electronic medical record database.利用电子病历数据库中的管理数据对高医疗利用群体进行特征描述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jul 5;19(1):452. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4239-2.
4
Emergency Department Utilization among Underserved African American Older Adults in South Los Angeles.南洛杉矶服务不足的非裔美国老年人群体在急诊科的利用情况。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 2;16(7):1175. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16071175.
5
Relationships Between Race/Ethnicity and Health Care Utilization Among Older Post-Acute Home Health Care Patients.老年康复期家庭医疗保健患者的种族/民族与医疗保健利用之间的关系。
J Appl Gerontol. 2020 Feb;39(2):201-213. doi: 10.1177/0733464818758453. Epub 2018 Feb 19.

本文引用的文献

1
The Evolving Role of Emergency Departments in the United States.美国急诊科不断演变的角色。
Rand Health Q. 2013 Jun 1;3(2):3. eCollection 2013 Summer.
2
Health Information Exchange in Emergency Medicine.急诊医学中的健康信息交换。
Ann Emerg Med. 2016 Feb;67(2):216-26. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.06.018. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
3
Point-of-care testing in the overcrowded emergency department--can it make a difference?在人满为患的急诊科进行即时检验——它能带来改变吗?
Crit Care. 2014 Dec 8;18(6):692. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0692-9.
4
Frequent emergency department utilization and behavioral health diagnoses.频繁使用急诊科以及行为健康诊断。
Nurs Res. 2015 Jan-Feb;64(1):3-12. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000065.
5
Impact of a health information exchange on resource use and Medicare-allowable reimbursements at 11 emergency departments in a midsized city.健康信息交换对一个中等城市11家急诊科资源使用及医疗保险可报销费用的影响。
West J Emerg Med. 2014 Nov;15(7):777-85. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2014.9.21311. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
6
Navigator reduces readmissions, inappropriate ED visits.导航器可减少再入院率和不适当的急诊就诊次数。
Hosp Case Manag. 2014 Dec;22(12):166, 171.
7
Predictors of frequent emergency department use among patients with psychiatric illness.精神疾病患者中频繁使用急诊的预测因素。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2014 Nov-Dec;36(6):716-20. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2014.09.010. Epub 2014 Sep 28.
8
Resource utilization and health care charges associated with the most frequent ED users.与最频繁的急诊室使用者相关的资源利用和医疗费用。
Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Oct;32(10):1215-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.07.013. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
9
Identifying frequent users of emergency department resources.识别急诊科资源的频繁使用者。
J Emerg Med. 2014 Sep;47(3):343-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.03.014. Epub 2014 May 9.
10
Frequent users of US emergency departments: characteristics and opportunities for intervention.美国急诊科的频繁使用者:特征及干预机会
Emerg Med J. 2014 Jul;31(7):526-532. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2013-202407. Epub 2014 Jan 28.

基于区域卫生信息交换(HIE)数据对急诊科频繁使用者的综合观察

A Comprehensive View of Frequent Emergency Department Users Based on Data from a Regional HIE.

作者信息

Saef Steven Howard, Carr Christine Marie, Bush Jeffrey S, Bartman Marc T, Sendor Adam B, Zhao Wenle, Su Zemin, Zhang Jingwen, Marsden Justin, Arnaud J Christophe, Melvin Cathy L, Lenert Leslie, Moran William P, Mauldin Patrick D, Obeid Jihad S

机构信息

From the Divisions of Emergency Medicine and General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, the Department of Public Health Sciences, the South Carolina Clinical and Translational Research Institute, and the Center for Biomedical Informatics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.

出版信息

South Med J. 2016 Jul;109(7):434-9. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000488.

DOI:10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000488
PMID:27364030
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4933324/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

A small but significant number of patients make frequent emergency department (ED) visits to multiple EDs within a region. We have a unique health information exchange (HIE) that includes every ED encounter in all hospital systems in our region. Using our HIE we were able to characterize all frequent ED users in our region, regardless of hospital visited or payer class. The objective of our study was to use data from an HIE to characterize patients in a region who are frequent ED users (FEDUs).

METHODS

We constructed a database from a cohort of adult patients (18 years old or older) with information in a regional HIE for a 1-year period beginning in April 2012. Patients were defined as FEDUs (those who made four or more visits during the study period) and non-FEDUs (those who made fewer than four ED visits during the study period). Predictor variables included age, race, sex, payer class, county of residence, and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes. Bivariate (χ(2)) and multivariate (logistic regression) analyses were performed to determine associations between predictor variables and the outcome of being a FEDU.

RESULTS

The database contained 127,672 patients, 12,293 (9.6%) of whom were FEDUs. Logistic regression showed the following patient characteristics to be significantly associated with the outcome of being a FEDU: age 35 to 44 years; African American race; Medicaid, Medicare, and dual-pay payer class; and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes 630 to 679 (complications of pregnancy, childbirth, and puerperium), 780 to 799 (ill-defined conditions), 280 to 289 (diseases of the blood), 290-319 (mental disorders), 680 to 709 (diseases of the skin and subcutaneous tissue), 710 to 739 (musculoskeletal and connective tissue disease), 460 to 519 (respiratory disease), and 520 to 579 (digestive disease). No significant differences were noted between men and women.

CONCLUSIONS

Data from an HIE can be used to describe all of the patients within a region who are FEDUs, regardless of the hospital system they visited. This information can be used to focus care coordination efforts and link appropriate patients to a medical home. Future studies can be designed to learn the reasons why patients become FEDUs, and interventions can be developed to address deficiencies in health care that result in frequent ED visits.

摘要

目的

在一个地区内,有一小部分但数量可观的患者频繁前往多个急诊科就诊。我们拥有一个独特的健康信息交换系统(HIE),涵盖了本地区所有医院系统的每一次急诊科就诊情况。利用我们的HIE,我们能够对本地区所有频繁就诊的急诊科患者进行特征描述,无论他们就诊的医院或支付方类别如何。我们研究的目的是利用HIE中的数据来描述本地区频繁就诊的急诊科患者(FEDU)的特征。

方法

我们从2012年4月开始的为期1年的区域HIE中,构建了一个包含成年患者(18岁及以上)信息的数据库。患者被分为频繁就诊的急诊科患者(FEDU,即研究期间就诊4次或更多次的患者)和非频繁就诊的急诊科患者(即研究期间急诊科就诊次数少于4次的患者)。预测变量包括年龄、种族、性别、支付方类别、居住县以及国际疾病分类第九版编码。进行了双变量(χ²)和多变量(逻辑回归)分析,以确定预测变量与成为FEDU这一结果之间的关联。

结果

该数据库包含127,672名患者,其中12,293名(9.6%)为FEDU。逻辑回归显示,以下患者特征与成为FEDU的结果显著相关:年龄35至44岁;非裔美国人种族;医疗补助、医疗保险和双重支付方类别;以及国际疾病分类第九版编码630至679(妊娠、分娩和产褥期并发症)、780至799(未明确的病症)、280至289(血液疾病)、290 - 319(精神障碍)、680至709(皮肤和皮下组织疾病)、710至739(肌肉骨骼和结缔组织疾病)、460至519(呼吸系统疾病)以及520至579(消化系统疾病)。男性和女性之间未发现显著差异。

结论

HIE中的数据可用于描述一个地区内所有FEDU患者,无论他们就诊的医院系统如何。这些信息可用于集中医疗协调工作,并将合适的患者与医疗之家联系起来。未来的研究可以设计用于了解患者成为FEDU的原因,并开发干预措施来解决导致频繁急诊科就诊的医疗保健不足问题。