• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

了解软性输尿管镜检查的成本。

Understanding the costs of flexible ureteroscopy.

作者信息

Ziemba Justin B, Matlaga Brian R

机构信息

Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA -

出版信息

Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2016 Dec;68(6):586-591. Epub 2016 Jul 1.

PMID:27364080
Abstract

Ureteroscopy (URS) is the first line treatment for the majority of symptomatic renal and ureteral stones. This review summarizes the current literature on the costs associated with URS. A high initial investment is required for scope acquisition. Once purchased, maintenance and repair costs continue to accrue. Durability of the scopes is an important consideration as more durable scopes will remain functional for longer and thus have lower overall repair costs. Currently available, newer generation scopes appear highly durable compared to their predecessors. Ancillary equipment, mostly disposable items represent the highest per procedure cost of URS. Despite these costs, URS remains highly profitable. However, it is also efficacious demonstrating superior cost-effectiveness with higher stone free rates at a lower cost relative to shock wave lithotripsy.

摘要

输尿管镜检查(URS)是大多数有症状的肾和输尿管结石的一线治疗方法。本综述总结了目前关于URS相关成本的文献。购置设备需要高额的初始投资。一旦购买,维护和维修成本会持续产生。设备的耐用性是一个重要考虑因素,因为更耐用的设备将在更长时间内保持功能,从而降低总体维修成本。与前代产品相比,目前可用的新一代设备似乎具有很高的耐用性。辅助设备,主要是一次性物品,是URS每次手术成本中最高的部分。尽管有这些成本,URS仍然具有很高的盈利能力。然而,它也是有效的,相对于冲击波碎石术,以更低的成本实现更高的结石清除率,显示出卓越的成本效益。

相似文献

1
Understanding the costs of flexible ureteroscopy.了解软性输尿管镜检查的成本。
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2016 Dec;68(6):586-591. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
2
Single-use disposable digital flexible ureteroscopes: an ex vivo assessment and cost analysis.一次性使用数码输尿管软镜:一项离体评估和成本分析。
BJU Int. 2018 May;121 Suppl 3:55-61. doi: 10.1111/bju.14235.
3
The effect of repair costs on the profitability of a ureteroscopy program.修复成本对输尿管镜检查项目盈利能力的影响。
J Endourol. 2015 Apr;29(4):406-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0435. Epub 2014 Nov 7.
4
Comparative analysis of direct and indirect costs of two minimally invasive techniques for the treatment of renal/ureteral calculi smaller than 2 cm.两种治疗小于 2cm 肾结石/输尿管结石的微创技术直接和间接成本的比较分析。
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2020 Sep;44(7):505-511. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2020.03.008. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
5
Cost Analysis of Flexible Ureteroscope Repairs: Evaluation of 655 Procedures in a Community-Based Practice.软性输尿管镜维修的成本分析:基于社区医疗实践的655例手术评估
J Endourol. 2016 Mar;30(3):254-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0642. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
6
Low-cost semirigid ureteroscopy is effective for ureteral stones: experience of a single high volume center.低成本半硬性输尿管镜检查治疗输尿管结石疗效显著:单一大容量中心经验
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2014 Jun 30;86(2):118-22. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2014.2.118.
7
A comprehensive literature-based equation to compare cost-effectiveness of a flexible ureteroscopy program with single-use versus reusable devices.一种基于文献的综合方程,用于比较单次使用与可重复使用设备的软性输尿管镜程序的成本效益。
Int Braz J Urol. 2019 Jul-Aug;45(4):658-670. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0880.
8
Efficiency and cost of treating proximal ureteral stones: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser.治疗近端输尿管结石的效率与成本:冲击波碎石术与输尿管镜检查联合钬:钇铝石榴石激光治疗的比较
Urology. 2004 Dec;64(6):1102-6; discussion 1106. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.07.040.
9
Retrospective Cost Analysis of a Single-Center Reusable Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Program: A Comparative Cost Simulation of Disposable fURS as an Alternative.单中心可重复使用软性输尿管肾镜项目的回顾性成本分析:一次性软性输尿管肾镜作为替代方案的成本比较模拟
J Endourol. 2017 Dec;31(12):1226-1230. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0427. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
10
Comparing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for treatment of proximal ureteric calculi: a cost-effectiveness study.体外冲击波碎石术与输尿管镜检查治疗近端输尿管结石的比较:一项成本效益研究。
Med J Malaysia. 2009 Mar;64(1):12-21.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Flexible Ureteroscope Performance between Reusable and Single-Use Models.可重复使用型与一次性使用型软性输尿管镜性能比较
J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 30;12(3):1093. doi: 10.3390/jcm12031093.
2
Microdamage analysis of single-use flexible ureteroscope immediately after lithotripsy use.一次性使用软性输尿管镜碎石术后即刻的微损伤分析。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 1;12(1):18367. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23345-z.
3
Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Use and Reusable Flexible Ureteroscopes for Renal Stone Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
一次性使用与可重复使用软性输尿管镜治疗肾结石的手术效果比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Oct 3;58(10):1388. doi: 10.3390/medicina58101388.
4
Hybrid flexible ureteroscopy strategy in the management of renal stones - a narrative review.混合式软性输尿管镜术在肾结石治疗中的应用策略——一篇叙述性综述。
J Med Life. 2022 Aug;15(8):919-926. doi: 10.25122/jml-2022-0110.
5
Operator-assisted vs self-achieved basketing during ureteroscopy: results from an in vitro preference study.操作者辅助与自行实现的输尿管镜下篮筐取石术:一项体外偏好研究的结果。
World J Urol. 2021 Jun;39(6):2169-2175. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03431-5. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
6
The cost of operating room delays in an endourology center.腔内泌尿外科中心手术室延迟的成本
Can Urol Assoc J. 2020 Jul;14(7):E304-E308. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.6099.
7
Endoscopic treatment of lower pole stones: is a disposable ureteroscope preferable? Results of a prospective case-control study.下极结石的内镜治疗:一次性输尿管镜是否更优?一项前瞻性病例对照研究的结果
Cent European J Urol. 2019;72(3):280-284. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2019.1962. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
8
Handling and protecting your flexible ureteroscope: how to maximise scope usage.操作与保护您的软性输尿管镜:如何最大限度地使用内镜
Transl Androl Urol. 2019 Sep;8(Suppl 4):S426-S435. doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.07.08.
9
Evaluation of Performance Parameters of the Disposable Flexible Ureterorenoscope (LITHOVUE) in Patients with Renal Stones: A Prospective, Observational, Single-arm, Multicenter Study.一次性软性输尿管镜(LITHOVUE)在肾结石患者中的性能参数评估:一项前瞻性、观察性、单臂、多中心研究。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 28;8(1):9795. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28247-7.
10
To Dust or Not To Dust: a Systematic Review of Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy Techniques.是否进行输尿管镜下激光碎石术:一项系统评价
Curr Urol Rep. 2017 Apr;18(4):32. doi: 10.1007/s11934-017-0677-8.