Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜缝合直肠固定术:一种治疗完全性直肠脱垂的有效方法。

Laparoscopic Suture Rectopexy: An Effective Treatment for Complete Rectal Prolapse.

作者信息

Chaudhry Vsm R

机构信息

Dy DGAFMS (Plg), O/o DGAFMS, Ministry of Defence, 'M' Block, New Delhi.

出版信息

Med J Armed Forces India. 2010 Apr;66(2):108-12. doi: 10.1016/S0377-1237(10)80119-4. Epub 2011 Jul 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The study was undertaken to validate the efficacy of laparoscopic suture rectopexy as the treatment modality of choice for complete prolapse of rectum.

METHODS

Data was prospectively collected and analyzed on 36 patients who underwent laparoscopic suture rectopexy for full thickness rectal prolapse between May 2006 to May 2008. There were 10 male and 26 female patients in this study with a mean age of 43.5 years. The pre and postoperative course of each patient was followed up with attention paid to ano-rectal manometery pressures, first bowel movement, hospital stay, duration of surgery, faecal incontinence, constipation, recurrence and morbidity. Mean follow up period was 12 months (range 1-24 months).

RESULT

One patient had conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery. while another had recurrence of prolapse in the follow up period. Mean duration of surgery was 115 (range 100-150) minutes. Postoperatively, the mean time for the first bowel movement was 40 (range 24-64) hours. Mean hospital stay was five (range 4-7) days. There was no significant postoperative complication except for one port site infection and one pelvic collection. Of the 20 patients who had varying degree of incontinence preoperatively, 16 (80%) showed improvement after surgery. Constipation was present in 15 (41%) patients preoperatively. Nine of these 15 patients (60%) improved as regards constipation after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic suture rectopexy is both safe and effective operation for the management of complete prolapse rectum. The procedure carries minimal morbidity and helps improve the problems of incontinence and constipation.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在验证腹腔镜缝合直肠固定术作为直肠完全脱垂首选治疗方式的疗效。

方法

前瞻性收集并分析了2006年5月至2008年5月间36例行腹腔镜缝合直肠固定术治疗全层直肠脱垂患者的数据。本研究中有10例男性和26例女性患者,平均年龄43.5岁。对每位患者术前和术后的情况进行随访,关注肛门直肠测压压力、首次排便、住院时间、手术时长、大便失禁、便秘、复发及并发症情况。平均随访期为12个月(范围1 - 24个月)。

结果

1例患者由腹腔镜手术转为开放手术,另1例在随访期内出现脱垂复发。平均手术时长为115(范围100 - 150)分钟。术后,首次排便的平均时间为40(范围24 - 64)小时。平均住院时间为5(范围4 - 7)天。除1例切口感染和1例盆腔积液外,无明显术后并发症。术前有不同程度失禁的20例患者中,16例(80%)术后症状改善。术前15例(41%)患者存在便秘。这15例患者中有9例(60%)术后便秘情况改善。

结论

腹腔镜缝合直肠固定术治疗直肠完全脱垂是一种安全有效的手术方式。该手术并发症极少,有助于改善失禁和便秘问题。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic Suture Rectopexy: An Effective Treatment for Complete Rectal Prolapse.
Med J Armed Forces India. 2010 Apr;66(2):108-12. doi: 10.1016/S0377-1237(10)80119-4. Epub 2011 Jul 21.
3
A single centre comparative study of laparoscopic mesh rectopexy versus suture rectopexy.
J Minim Access Surg. 2014 Jan;10(1):18-22. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.124456.
4
Laparoscopic management of persistent complete rectal prolapse in children.
J Pediatr Surg. 2010 Mar;45(3):533-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.09.013.
5
Ten-year follow up after laparoscopic suture rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse.
Colorectal Dis. 2014 Oct;16(10):809-14. doi: 10.1111/codi.12689.
6
Long-term outcome of laparoscopic rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse.
Tech Coloproctol. 2019 Jan;23(1):25-31. doi: 10.1007/s10151-018-1913-z. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
7
Laparoscopic Ventral Rectopexy Versus Laparoscopic Wells Rectopexy for Complete Rectal Prolapse: Long-Term Results.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Jan;28(1):1-6. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0012. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
9
Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for external rectal prolapse improves constipation and avoids de novo constipation.
Colorectal Dis. 2010 Jun;12(6):526-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.01859.x. Epub 2009 Apr 10.
10
Laparoscopic Versus Open Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Cureus. 2021 Mar 29;13(3):e14175. doi: 10.7759/cureus.14175.

本文引用的文献

1
Rectal prolapse.
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007 Mar;22(3):231-43. doi: 10.1007/s00384-006-0198-2. Epub 2006 Oct 5.
2
A comparison of open vs. laparoscopic abdominal rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse: a meta-analysis.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Oct;48(10):1930-40. doi: 10.1007/s10350-005-0077-x.
3
Surgical management of rectal prolapse.
Arch Surg. 2005 Jan;140(1):63-73. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.140.1.63.
4
Laparoscopic treatment of rectal prolapse: experience gained in a prospective multicenter study.
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2002 Jul;387(3-4):130-7. doi: 10.1007/s00423-002-0305-y. Epub 2002 Jul 18.
5
Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse.
Br J Surg. 2002 Jan;89(1):35-9. doi: 10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01957.x.
6
Functional results two years after laparoscopic rectopexy.
Am J Surg. 2001 Aug;182(2):168-73. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(01)00672-9.
9
Laparoscopic surgery for rectal prolapse and outlet obstruction.
Dis Colon Rectum. 1999 Sep;42(9):1189-94; discussion 1194-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02238572.
10
Successful treatment of rectal prolapse by laparoscopic suture rectopexy.
Surg Endosc. 1999 Sep;13(9):858-61. doi: 10.1007/s004649901119.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验