Suppr超能文献

外置式阑尾切除术——我们的经验

Port extériorisation appendectomy-our experience.

作者信息

Bharathi R Saranga, Sharma Vinay, Chakladar Arunava, Kumari Pravin

机构信息

Senior Resident (GE Surgery), Division of Surgical GE (General Surgery), PGIMER, Chandigarh - 160012.

Classified Specialist (Surgery), Military Hospital, Ramgarh.

出版信息

Med J Armed Forces India. 2011 Apr;67(2):147-51. doi: 10.1016/S0377-1237(11)60016-6. Epub 2011 Jul 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic appendectomy is conventionally performed using 3 ports, with division of appendicular base and artery using staples/endoloops/clips. Paucity of surgical laparoscope and laparoscopic disposables necessitated adoption of laparoscopic technique obviating the need for the above. We document our experience with the port exteriorisation appendectomy performed predominantly using two ports.

METHODS

Between July 2008 and April 2009, 65 appendectomies were performed at a zonal hospital, of which 26 were performed using the contemplated technique. Technical challenges, conversions, operative time, complications, postoperative recovery, and cosmesis were analysed.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients (13 males and 13 females), with a mean age of 22.88 ± 11.94 years, underwent port exteriorisation appendectomy. The median operative time was 20 minutes. Two cases (7.7%) needed conversion to open appendectomy. Dense adhesions necessitated addition of a working instrument/port in two cases (7.7%). Postoperative pain was < 25 by verbal response score. Visceral component predominated on the operative day, which got confined to port sites subsequently. One patient (3.85%) developed surgical site infection. Friable, gangrenous, short fibrosed appendix on a fixed caecum and very thick abdominal wall were its limitations. Postoperative recovery and cosmesis were excellent.

CONCLUSION

Port exteriorisation appendectomy proves simple, safe, economical, and efficacious, when conditions favour its performance. However, difficult appendices warrant conversion to three ports technique or to open procedure.

摘要

背景

传统的腹腔镜阑尾切除术通常使用3个端口,通过吻合器/内镜圈套器/夹子来离断阑尾根部和动脉。由于手术腹腔镜和腹腔镜一次性器械短缺,需要采用无需上述器械的腹腔镜技术。我们记录了主要使用两个端口进行端口外置阑尾切除术的经验。

方法

2008年7月至2009年4月期间,一家地区医院共进行了65例阑尾切除术,其中26例采用了上述技术。分析了技术挑战、中转情况、手术时间、并发症、术后恢复和美观情况。

结果

26例患者(13例男性和13例女性)接受了端口外置阑尾切除术,平均年龄为22.88±11.94岁。中位手术时间为20分钟。2例(7.7%)需要中转至开腹阑尾切除术。2例(7.7%)因致密粘连需要增加一个操作器械/端口。术后疼痛通过语言反应评分<25分。手术当天以内脏疼痛为主,随后局限于端口部位。1例患者(3.85%)发生手术部位感染。其局限性在于阑尾脆弱、坏疽、纤维组织短且盲肠固定,以及腹壁非常厚。术后恢复和美观情况良好。

结论

当条件允许时,端口外置阑尾切除术证明是简单、安全、经济且有效的。然而,对于困难的阑尾,需要中转至三端口技术或开腹手术。

相似文献

1
Port extériorisation appendectomy-our experience.外置式阑尾切除术——我们的经验
Med J Armed Forces India. 2011 Apr;67(2):147-51. doi: 10.1016/S0377-1237(11)60016-6. Epub 2011 Jul 21.
2
One, two or three port appendectomy - a rational approach.单孔、两孔或三孔阑尾切除术——一种合理的方法。
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2013 Sep;8(3):226-31. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2011.33991. Epub 2013 Mar 12.

本文引用的文献

9
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术
Am J Surg. 2000 May;179(5):375-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(00)00373-1.
10
Pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术后疼痛。
Br J Surg. 2000 Mar;87(3):273-84. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01374.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验