Suppr超能文献

成人腹腔镜辅助阑尾切除术:双套管技术

Laparoscope-assisted appendectomy in adults: the two-trocar technique.

作者信息

Fazili Fiaz Maqbool, Al-Bouq Yousef, El-Hassan Osman M, Gaffar Hossam Fawzi A

机构信息

Department of Surgery, King Fahad Hospital, Al Medinah Al Munawarah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Ann Saudi Med. 2006 Mar-Apr;26(2):100-4. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2006.100.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Open appendectomy is still the most common method of treating appendicitis. Laparoscopic procedures for removal of the appendix by the "in" technique as an alternative to conventional appendectomy have gained wide popularity, but have been criticized for their technical difficulty and high cost. We assessed the safety and efficacy of the laparoscope-assisted appendectomy (the two-trocar technique) in adults.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively studied 129 patients who had appendectomy using the laparoscope-assisted two-trocar technique between July 2002 to December 2003. The procedures were done by consultants and surgeons-in-training with experience in minimally invasive and open techniques. Locally modified endoloop and reusable trocars were used to reduce the cost. Appendectomy was performed extra-abdominally after the appendix was identified by using a laparoscope through one port and then delivered outside through the second port using reusable laparoscopy instruments.

RESULTS

The two-trocar technique was successful in 101 (78.3%) cases; 14 (10.8%) needed a third trocar to complete the operation extra-abdominally, 6 (4.6%) were converted to open surgery, and 5 (3.8%) had an intra-abdominal laparoscopic appendectomy. The mean operation time was 35 minutes (range, 30-90 minutes). Six cases (4.6%) had infection. The mean hospital stay was 2.8 days (range, 2-7 days). No case of port hernia was reported during the follow-up period (range, 14-30 months).

CONCLUSION

The laparoscope-assisted two-trocar technique for removal of the appendix can be performed as safely and efficiently as the open technique, but at a lower cost than the complete laparoscopic "in" method and does not need much technical expertise. This method is recommended as an alternative procedure to open appendectomy or the complete laparoscopic "in" technique in adults.

摘要

背景

开腹阑尾切除术仍是治疗阑尾炎最常用的方法。作为传统阑尾切除术的替代方法,采用“in”技术的腹腔镜阑尾切除手术已广泛普及,但因其技术难度大及成本高而受到批评。我们评估了成人腹腔镜辅助阑尾切除术(双套管技术)的安全性和有效性。

患者与方法

我们回顾性研究了2002年7月至2003年12月间采用腹腔镜辅助双套管技术行阑尾切除术的129例患者。手术由顾问医师和接受过微创及开放技术培训且有经验的外科医生完成。使用局部改良的内镜圈套器和可重复使用的套管以降低成本。通过一个端口使用腹腔镜识别阑尾后,在腹腔外进行阑尾切除术,然后使用可重复使用的腹腔镜器械通过第二个端口将阑尾取出体外。

结果

双套管技术在101例(78.3%)患者中成功;14例(10.8%)需要第三个套管以在腹腔外完成手术,6例(4.6%)中转开腹手术,5例(3.8%)进行了腹腔内腹腔镜阑尾切除术。平均手术时间为35分钟(范围30 - 90分钟)。6例(4.6%)发生感染。平均住院时间为2.8天(范围2 - 7天)。随访期间(范围14 - 30个月)未报告套管疝病例。

结论

腹腔镜辅助双套管阑尾切除技术与开腹技术一样安全有效,但成本低于完全腹腔镜“in”法,且不需要太多技术专长。推荐该方法作为成人开腹阑尾切除术或完全腹腔镜“in”技术的替代手术。

相似文献

4
One-trocar appendectomy in pediatric surgery.小儿外科单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术
Surg Endosc. 1998 Feb;12(2):177-8. doi: 10.1007/s004649900624.
6
Transumbilical extracorporeal laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy.经脐体外腹腔镜辅助阑尾切除术
J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Feb;53(2):256-259. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.11.012. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
9
Specimen removal after laparoscopic appendectomy: a cheap trick.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2008 Jan-Feb;12(1):55-7.
10
Video-assisted transumbilical appendectomy in children.儿童电视辅助经脐阑尾切除术
J Pediatr Surg. 2006 Apr;41(4):710-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.12.014.

引用本文的文献

1
Port extériorisation appendectomy-our experience.外置式阑尾切除术——我们的经验
Med J Armed Forces India. 2011 Apr;67(2):147-51. doi: 10.1016/S0377-1237(11)60016-6. Epub 2011 Jul 21.

本文引用的文献

2
4
Laparoscopic appendectomy in Switzerland: a prospective audit of 2, 179 cases.
Dig Surg. 2000;17(5):497-502. doi: 10.1159/000051947.
5
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术
Am J Surg. 2000 May;179(5):375-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(00)00373-1.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验