• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《精神分裂症阴性症状临床评估访谈量表(CAINS)韩文版的验证》

Validation of the Korean-Version of the Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia (CAINS).

作者信息

Jung Sung Il, Woo Jungmin, Kim Yang-Tae, Kwak Sang Gyu

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Catholic University of Daegu School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea .

Department of Psychiatry, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Daegu, Korea .

出版信息

J Korean Med Sci. 2016 Jul;31(7):1114-20. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.7.1114. Epub 2016 May 16.

DOI:10.3346/jkms.2016.31.7.1114
PMID:27366011
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4901005/
Abstract

The Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms (CAINS) was developed to overcome the limitations of existing instruments and reflect the current view of negative symptoms. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms (K-CAINS). Inpatients (n = 49) and outpatients (n = 70) with schizophrenia were recruited from three institutions. The confirmative factor analysis, test-retest reliability, inter-rater reliability, convergent validity, and discriminant validity were assessed. The study group consisted of 71 males (59.7%) and 48 females (40.3%). Their mean age was 42.15 years (SD = 12.2). The K-CAINS was confirmed to be divided into two subscales of 9 items related to "motivation/pleasure" and 4 items related to "expression" in concordance with the original version of the CAINS. The results showed that the K-CAINS had a good inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.84-0.94), test-retest reliability (r = 0.90, P < 0.001). Convergent validity was proven by demonstrating a significant correlation with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) negative subscale, and the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS). Discriminant validity was proven by the lack of a significant correlation with the PANSS positive subscale, the Korean version of the Beck depression inventory (BDI), the Korean version of the Calgary depression scale for schizophrenia (K-CDSS), and the Modified Simpson Angus scale (MSAS). The K-CAINS could be a reliable and valid tool to assess the negative symptoms of Korean schizophrenia patients.

摘要

阴性症状临床评估访谈量表(CAINS)的开发旨在克服现有工具的局限性,并反映当前对阴性症状的看法。本研究的目的是评估阴性症状临床评估访谈量表韩语版(K-CAINS)的信效度。从三个机构招募了49名住院和70名门诊精神分裂症患者。评估了验证性因素分析、重测信度、评分者间信度、聚合效度和区分效度。研究组包括71名男性(59.7%)和48名女性(40.3%)。他们的平均年龄为42.15岁(标准差=12.2)。K-CAINS被证实可分为与“动机/愉悦感”相关的9个项目和与“表达”相关的4个项目两个分量表,与CAINS原版一致。结果显示,K-CAINS具有良好的评分者间信度(组内相关系数=0.84-0.94)、重测信度(r=0.90,P<0.001)。通过证明与阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)阴性分量表以及阴性症状评估量表(SANS)存在显著相关性,证实了聚合效度。通过与PANSS阳性分量表、贝克抑郁量表韩语版(BDI)、精神分裂症卡尔加里抑郁量表韩语版(K-CDSS)和改良辛普森安格斯量表(MSAS)缺乏显著相关性,证实了区分效度。K-CAINS可能是评估韩国精神分裂症患者阴性症状的可靠有效工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/432a/4901005/2ad03f961550/jkms-31-1114-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/432a/4901005/2ad03f961550/jkms-31-1114-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/432a/4901005/2ad03f961550/jkms-31-1114-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of the Korean-Version of the Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia (CAINS).《精神分裂症阴性症状临床评估访谈量表(CAINS)韩文版的验证》
J Korean Med Sci. 2016 Jul;31(7):1114-20. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.7.1114. Epub 2016 May 16.
2
Validation of the Spanish version of the Clinical Assessment for Negative Symptoms (CAINS).阴性症状临床评估量表(CAINS)西班牙语版本的验证
Schizophr Res. 2015 Aug;166(1-3):104-9. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2015.06.006. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
3
Validity and Reliability Study of Turkish Version of Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms (CAINS).阴性症状临床评估访谈(CAINS)土耳其语版本的效度与信度研究
Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2024 Feb 28;61(1):59-65. doi: 10.29399/npa.28438. eCollection 2024.
4
Validation of the German version of the Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms (CAINS).验证德语版的阴性症状临床评估访谈(CAINS)。
Psychiatry Res. 2014 Dec 15;220(1-2):659-63. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.07.070. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
5
Validation of the Korean Version of the Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms.阴性症状临床评估访谈韩文版的验证
Psychiatry Investig. 2017 Jul;14(4):413-419. doi: 10.4306/pi.2017.14.4.413. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
6
Assessing negative symptoms in schizophrenia: Validity of the clinical assessment interview for negative symptoms in Singapore.评估精神分裂症的阴性症状:新加坡阴性症状临床评估访谈的有效性。
Schizophr Res. 2019 Apr;206:177-182. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2018.11.029. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
7
Measuring negative symptoms in patients with schizophrenia: reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Motivation and Pleasure Scale-Self-Report.测量精神分裂症患者的阴性症状:韩文版动机与快感量表-自我报告的信效度
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2016 May 11;12:1167-72. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S107775. eCollection 2016.
8
The Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms (CAINS): final development and validation.阴性症状临床评估访谈(CAINS):最终的开发和验证。
Am J Psychiatry. 2013 Feb;170(2):165-72. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12010109.
9
Examining the reliability and validity of the Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms within the Management of Schizophrenia in Clinical Practice (MOSAIC) multisite national study.在临床实践中精神分裂症管理多中心全国性研究(MOSAIC)中检验阴性症状临床评估访谈的信度和效度。
Schizophr Res. 2017 Jul;185:137-143. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.01.011. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
10
Psychometric Characteristics of the Macedonian Version of Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms (CAINS).马其顿语版临床评估访谈阴性症状量表(CAINS)的心理测量学特征。
Psychiatr Danub. 2021 Fall;33(3):347-353. doi: 10.24869/psyd.2021.347.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comparative Analysis of Neurocognitive Function in Community- and Hospital-Based Patients With Schizophrenia.社区与医院环境下精神分裂症患者神经认知功能的比较分析
Psychiatry Investig. 2024 Oct;21(10):1110-1119. doi: 10.30773/pi.2024.0077. Epub 2024 Oct 17.
2
Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms (CAINS): A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties.阴性症状临床评估访谈(CAINS):测量特性的系统评价。
Schizophr Bull. 2024 Jul 27;50(4):747-756. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbad137.
3
Psychometric properties of the Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms (CAINS) in patients with depression and its relationship to affective symptoms.

本文引用的文献

1
Validation of the Chinese version of the Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms (CAINS): a preliminary report.阴性症状临床评估访谈中文版(CAINS)的验证:初步报告
Front Psychol. 2015 Feb 2;6:7. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00007. eCollection 2015.
2
Validation of the German version of the Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms (CAINS).验证德语版的阴性症状临床评估访谈(CAINS)。
Psychiatry Res. 2014 Dec 15;220(1-2):659-63. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.07.070. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
3
Deconstructing negative symptoms of schizophrenia: avolition-apathy and diminished expression clusters predict clinical presentation and functional outcome.
抑郁症患者阴性症状临床评估访谈(CAINS)的心理测量特性及其与情感症状的关系。
Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2023 Oct 26;22(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12991-023-00474-x.
4
Bridge centrality network structure of negative symptoms in people with schizophrenia.精神分裂症患者阴性症状的桥接中心性网络结构
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2023 Apr;273(3):589-600. doi: 10.1007/s00406-022-01474-w. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
5
Validation of accelerometry as a digital phenotyping measure of negative symptoms in schizophrenia.将加速度计作为精神分裂症阴性症状数字表型测量方法的验证
Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2022 Apr 15;8(1):37. doi: 10.1038/s41537-022-00241-z.
6
Validation of the French Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms in a Sample of Stable French Individuals With Schizophrenia.针对一组病情稳定的法国精神分裂症患者样本,对法语版阴性症状临床评估访谈进行验证。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 1;13:836600. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.836600. eCollection 2022.
7
What is the Best Latent Structure of Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia? A Systematic Review.精神分裂症阴性症状的最佳潜在结构是什么?一项系统综述。
Schizophr Bull Open. 2021 Apr 21;2(1):sgab013. doi: 10.1093/schizbullopen/sgab013. eCollection 2021 Jan.
8
EPA guidance on assessment of negative symptoms in schizophrenia.美国环保署关于精神分裂症阴性症状评估的指南。
Eur Psychiatry. 2021 Feb 18;64(1):e23. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.11.
9
Factorial Structure of the Serbian Version of the Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms - Evidence for Three Factors of Negative Symptoms.阴性症状临床评估访谈塞尔维亚语版的因子结构——阴性症状三因素的证据
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 26;11:570356. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.570356. eCollection 2020.
10
Network Analysis Reveals the Latent Structure of Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia.网络分析揭示精神分裂症阴性症状的潜在结构。
Schizophr Bull. 2019 Sep 11;45(5):1033-1041. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sby133.
解构精神分裂症的阴性症状:意志缺失-淡漠和表情减退簇可预测临床表型和功能结局。
J Psychiatr Res. 2013 Jun;47(6):783-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.01.015. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
4
The Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms (CAINS): final development and validation.阴性症状临床评估访谈(CAINS):最终的开发和验证。
Am J Psychiatry. 2013 Feb;170(2):165-72. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12010109.
5
Development and psychometric validation of the Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms (CAINS).《阴性症状临床评估访谈(CAINS)的编制与心理测量学验证》。
Schizophr Res. 2011 Nov;132(2-3):140-5. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2011.06.030. Epub 2011 Jul 27.
6
Toward the next generation of negative symptom assessments: the collaboration to advance negative symptom assessment in schizophrenia.迈向下一代阴性症状评估:推进精神分裂症阴性症状评估的合作。
Schizophr Bull. 2011 Mar;37(2):291-9. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbq104. Epub 2010 Sep 22.
7
The 2009 schizophrenia PORT psychopharmacological treatment recommendations and summary statements.2009 年精神分裂症 PORT 精神药理学治疗建议和总结陈述。
Schizophr Bull. 2010 Jan;36(1):71-93. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbp116. Epub 2009 Dec 2.
8
Periods of recovery in deficit syndrome schizophrenia: a 20-year multi-follow-up longitudinal study.缺陷型精神分裂症的恢复期:一项长达 20 年的多随访纵向研究。
Schizophr Bull. 2010 Jul;36(4):788-99. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbn167. Epub 2008 Dec 18.
9
Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.组内相关系数:在评估评分者可靠性中的应用。
Psychol Bull. 1979 Mar;86(2):420-8. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.86.2.420.
10
Translation procedures for standardised quality of life questionnaires: The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) approach.标准化生活质量问卷的翻译程序:欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)的方法。
Eur J Cancer. 2007 Aug;43(12):1810-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.05.029. Epub 2007 Aug 3.