Idowu Kolapo A, Adenuga Babafemi, Otubu Oritsetsemaye, Narasimhan Krishnan, Kamara Feremusu, Hunter-Richardson Finie, Larbi Daniel, Sherif Zaki A, Laiyemo Adeyinka O
Department of Community and Family Medicine (Kolapo A. Idowu, Babafemi Adenuga, Oritsetsemaye Otubu, Krishnan Narasimhan, Feremusu Kamara, Finie Hunter-Richardson), Washington DC, USA.
Department of Medicine (Daniel Larbi, Adeyinka O. Laiyemo), Washington DC, USA.
Ann Gastroenterol. 2016 Jul-Sep;29(3):336-40. doi: 10.20524/aog.2016.0040. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
Historically, studies suggested that immigrants acquire the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) as US-born persons within the same generation. CRC risk of immigrants is largely unknown in this era of cancer screening and widespread immigration. We investigated the association of place of birth and cancer beliefs with uptake of CRC screening.
The 2007 Health Information National Trends Survey was used and 4,299 respondents (weighted population size=81,896,392) who were 50 years and older (3,960 US-born and 339 foreign-born) were identified. We defined being current with CRC screening guidelines as the use of fecal occult blood test within 1 year, sigmoidoscopy within 5 years, or colonoscopy within 10 years. We compared being up-to-date with CRC screening among foreign-born versus US-born respondents. Logistic regression models were used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Overall, 2,594 (63.3%) US-born and 208 (52.8%) foreign-born respondents were current with CRC screening. Foreign-born respondents were less current in unadjusted model (OR 0.65; 95% CI: 0.50-0.85) but became non-statistically significant after adjustment (OR 0.79; 95% CI: 0.51-1.24). Respondents who believed that screening finds cancer when it is easy to treat (OR 2.85; 95% CI: 1.44-3.61), those who believed that cancer can be cured when detected early (OR 1.56; 95% CI: 1.20-2.00), and those who worry about getting cancer (OR 1.34; 95% CI: 1.10-1.61) were likely to be current with CRC screening. However, respondents with fatalistic beliefs were borderline less likely to be current (OR 0.82; 95% CI: 0.65-1.04).
There is a need to improve education on CRC screening, particularly among foreign-born adults.
从历史上看,研究表明移民在同一代人中患结直肠癌(CRC)的风险与美国本土出生的人相当。在这个癌症筛查普及和移民广泛的时代,移民患CRC的风险在很大程度上尚不清楚。我们调查了出生地和癌症认知与CRC筛查接受情况之间的关联。
使用了2007年全国健康信息趋势调查,确定了4299名年龄在50岁及以上的受访者(加权人口规模=81896392)(3960名美国本土出生和339名外国出生)。我们将符合CRC筛查指南定义为在1年内使用粪便潜血试验、在5年内使用乙状结肠镜检查或在10年内使用结肠镜检查。我们比较了外国出生和美国本土出生的受访者中符合CRC筛查最新标准的情况。使用逻辑回归模型计算比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)。
总体而言,2594名(63.3%)美国本土出生和208名(52.8%)外国出生的受访者符合CRC筛查标准。在未调整模型中,外国出生的受访者符合标准的比例较低(OR 0.65;95%CI:0.50-0.85),但调整后变得无统计学意义(OR 0.79;95%CI:0.51-1.24)。认为筛查能在癌症易于治疗时发现癌症的受访者(OR 2.85;95%CI:1.44-3.61)、认为癌症早期发现可治愈的受访者(OR 1.56;95%CI:1.20-2.00)以及担心患癌症的受访者(OR 1.34;95%CI:1.10-1.61)更有可能符合CRC筛查标准。然而,持宿命论观点的受访者符合标准的可能性略低(OR 0.82;95%CI:0.65-1.04)。
有必要加强对CRC筛查知识的教育,尤其是在外国出生的成年人中。