Suppr超能文献

心脏骤停与胃肠道出血:一个医学启发法的案例

Cardiac Arrest and Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Case of Medical Heuristics.

作者信息

Ajayi Tokunbo, Okudo Jerome

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, 55 Cedar Lane, Columbia, MD 21044, USA.

School of Public Health, University of Texas, 1200 Pressler Street, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

出版信息

Case Rep Med. 2016;2016:9621390. doi: 10.1155/2016/9621390. Epub 2016 Jun 6.

Abstract

Insufficient clinical data from patients is a major cause of errors in medical diagnostics. In an attempt to make a diagnosis, initial clinical information provided to the physician may be overly relied on as the only information required in making diagnosis leading to anchoring. Failure to rely on differential diagnoses in spite of new signs and symptoms or rethinking of initial hypothesis may lead to fixation on a certain diagnosis, which may lead to significant morbidity and mortality. In the event that there is an anchoring heuristic, like in our patient, it is important to consider differential diagnoses; however, it is not wrong to rely on some form of anchor. We report a case of a 62-year-old male with a history of multiple medical conditions and a history of acetaminophen overdose who presented to the hospital with large amounts of coffee ground emesis. He was subsequently transferred to the liver transplant center on discovery that he was in fulminant hepatic failure and died two days later in spite of aggressive medical treatment.

摘要

患者临床数据不足是医学诊断错误的主要原因。在进行诊断时,提供给医生的初始临床信息可能会被过度依赖,作为诊断所需的唯一信息,从而导致锚定效应。尽管出现了新的体征和症状,却未能依赖鉴别诊断或重新思考初始假设,可能会导致对某一特定诊断的执着,这可能会导致严重的发病率和死亡率。如果存在锚定启发式思维,就像我们的患者那样,考虑鉴别诊断很重要;然而,依赖某种形式的锚定也并非错误。我们报告一例62岁男性病例,该患者有多种病史,曾过量服用对乙酰氨基酚,因大量咖啡渣样呕吐物入院。随后发现他处于暴发性肝衰竭,尽管进行了积极的药物治疗,但两天后仍死亡,随后被转至肝移植中心。

相似文献

2
Intentional or Inadvertent Acetaminophen Overdose-How Lethal It Really Is?有意或无意的对乙酰氨基酚过量-它真的有多致命?
Psychosomatics. 2019 Nov-Dec;60(6):574-581. doi: 10.1016/j.psym.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 May 14.
5
Quantifying Heuristic Bias: Anchoring, Availability, and Representativeness.量化启发式偏差:锚定、可得性和代表性。
Teach Learn Med. 2018 Jan-Mar;30(1):67-75. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2017.1332631. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
6
Heuristic errors in clinical reasoning.临床推理中的启发式错误。
Clin Teach. 2016 Aug;13(4):287-90. doi: 10.1111/tct.12444. Epub 2015 Sep 23.

本文引用的文献

4
Heuristic errors in clinical reasoning.临床推理中的启发式错误。
Clin Teach. 2016 Aug;13(4):287-90. doi: 10.1111/tct.12444. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
6
"First, know thyself": cognition and error in medicine.“首先,认识你自己”:医学中的认知与错误
Acta Diabetol. 2016 Apr;53(2):169-75. doi: 10.1007/s00592-015-0762-8. Epub 2015 May 5.
7
Don't drop the anchor.不要抛锚。
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Jan;30(1):131-5. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2995-6.
8
Reexamining our bias against heuristics.重新审视我们对启发式方法的偏见。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2014 Aug;19(3):457-64. doi: 10.1007/s10459-014-9518-4. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
9
Cognitive diagnostic error in internal medicine.内科认知诊断错误。
Eur J Intern Med. 2013 Sep;24(6):525-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2013.03.006. Epub 2013 Apr 6.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验