Doğruel Behiye, Varnalı Giray, Selek Çiğdem, Telci Lütfi, Akıncı İbrahim Özkan
Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul University, İstanbul, Turkey.
Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2014 Feb;42(1):6-11. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2013.41. Epub 2013 May 23.
To evaluate the efficiency of use of rocuronium and vecuronium in different dose regimens in neuroanaesthesia practice in terms of intubation time and first additional dose requirement.
Sixty-eight neurosurgery patients with intracranial mass that were operated on were included in our study. Patients were randomly divided into 4 groups according to the induction dose of neuromuscular blocker (NMB) as: Group 1: Vecuronium 0.1 mg kg(-1), Group 2: Priming, 20% of total vecuronium (0.1 mg kg(-1)) needed for induction injected 5 minutes before induction and then the rest used for induction, Group 3: Rocuronium group: 0.6 mg kg(-1), Group 4: Rocuronium with rapid-sequence induction dose (RSID) (1.2 mg kg(-1)). TOF (Train of four) test was used to decide on intubation and an additional NMB dose during surgery. Intubation quality, time from induction to intubation, time until the first additional NMB dose and subsequent NMB dose intervals were recorded.
The RSID of rocuronium provided a significantly shorter time period for intubation against the other groups. Also, the time period from induction to first additional NMB requirement was significantly longer in the RSID group than the others. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups' in terms of time period for monitorisation, positioning and start of surgery.
With the use of RSID of rocuronium, it was seen that excellent intubation quality is provided at around 1 minute and, with its longer duration of action until a first additional dose, it covers the time period for monitorisation, positioning and start of surgery. Because of these effects, we think that RSID of rocuronium may be a better choice of dose regimen for neuroanaesthesia practice.
根据插管时间和首次追加剂量需求,评估在神经麻醉实践中不同剂量方案使用罗库溴铵和维库溴铵的效率。
本研究纳入了68例接受颅内肿物手术的神经外科患者。根据神经肌肉阻滞剂(NMB)的诱导剂量将患者随机分为4组:第1组:维库溴铵0.1 mg/kg;第2组:预充组,诱导前5分钟注射诱导所需总维库溴铵(0.1 mg/kg)的20%,其余用于诱导;第3组:罗库溴铵组:0.6 mg/kg;第4组:快速序贯诱导剂量(RSID)的罗库溴铵(1.2 mg/kg)。使用四个成串刺激(TOF)试验来决定插管和手术期间追加NMB的剂量。记录插管质量、诱导至插管的时间、直至首次追加NMB剂量的时间以及随后的NMB剂量间隔。
罗库溴铵的RSID与其他组相比,插管时间明显更短。此外,RSID组从诱导到首次追加NMB需求的时间明显长于其他组。各组在监测、体位摆放和手术开始时间方面无统计学显著差异。
使用罗库溴铵的RSID时,可在1分钟左右实现出色的插管质量,且其作用持续时间较长,直至首次追加剂量,涵盖了监测、体位摆放和手术开始的时间段。由于这些作用,我们认为罗库溴铵的RSID可能是神经麻醉实践中更好的剂量方案选择。