Yıldırım Özlem İlhan, Günüşen İlkben, Sargın Asuman, Fırat Vicdan, Karaman Semra
Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Ege University Faculty of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey.
Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2014 Dec;42(6):326-31. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2014.49389. Epub 2014 Jul 11.
In this study, the effects of anaesthetic technique on mother and newborn were investigated in a retrospective analysis of parturients with cardiac diseases undergoing Caesarean section between 2006-2012.
Our hospital's medical information system records were analyzed, and we found 107 parturients with cardiac disease and were undergoing Caesarean section, and their demographic data and obstetric, anaesthetic, and neonatal record forms were inspected.
Fifty-three (49.5%) pregnant women received general anaesthesia, and 54 (50.5%) received regional anaesthesia (34 spinal, 19 epidural and 1 CSE) (p=0.05). Week of pregnancy was lower for the group of general anaesthesia (p=0.007). Among cardiac parturients, valvular lesion rates were higher (75.7%). The relationship between existing cardiac disease and anaesthetic management was not significant (p=0.28). However, we determined that parturients with higher NYHA (New York Heart Association) classifications had higher general anaesthesia rates. (p=0.001). A rate of 39% of 74 NYHA I patients were undergoing general anaesthesia; this rate was 64% for NYHA II and 100% for NYHA III. The patients with cardiac surgery or medical treatment history had higher general anaesthesia rates (p=0.009). Although the general anaesthesia group newborn weights were lower (p=0.03), there was no difference between groups for APGAR scores. With regard to postoperative complications and hospital stay, the groups were similar.
We determined that general and epidural rates in parturients with cardiac diseases were similar, general anaesthesia was preferred for parturients who had higher NYHA classifications and surgical or medical treatment history. We considered that general anaesthesia criteria should reduce the anaesthesia management of parturients with cardiac disease; epidural or CSE anaesthesia applications should increase according to the patient's physical state, haemodynamic parameters, and obstetric indications.
本研究通过对2006年至2012年期间接受剖宫产的心脏病产妇进行回顾性分析,探讨麻醉技术对母亲和新生儿的影响。
分析我院医疗信息系统记录,发现107例患有心脏病且正在接受剖宫产的产妇,并检查了她们的人口统计学数据以及产科、麻醉和新生儿记录表格。
53例(49.5%)孕妇接受全身麻醉,54例(50.5%)接受区域麻醉(34例脊髓麻醉、19例硬膜外麻醉和1例腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉)(p=0.05)。全身麻醉组的孕周较低(p=0.007)。在心脏病产妇中,瓣膜病变率较高(75.7%)。现有心脏病与麻醉管理之间的关系不显著(p=0.28)。然而,我们确定纽约心脏协会(NYHA)分级较高的产妇全身麻醉率较高(p=0.001)。74例NYHA I级患者中39%接受全身麻醉;NYHA II级患者的这一比例为64%,NYHA III级患者为100%。有心脏手术或治疗史的患者全身麻醉率较高(p=0.009)。虽然全身麻醉组新生儿体重较低(p=0.03),但两组之间的阿氏评分无差异。关于术后并发症和住院时间,两组相似。
我们确定心脏病产妇的全身麻醉和硬膜外麻醉率相似,NYHA分级较高且有手术或治疗史的产妇更倾向于全身麻醉。我们认为全身麻醉标准应减少对心脏病产妇的麻醉管理;应根据患者身体状况、血流动力学参数和产科指征增加硬膜外或腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉的应用。