Akkaya Akcan, Bilgi Murat, Demirhan Abdullah, Kurt Adem Deniz, Tekelioğlu Ümit Yaşar, Akkaya Kadir, Koçoğlu Hasan, Tekçe Hikmet
Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Abant İzzet Baysal University Faculty of Medicine, Bolu, Turkey.
Department of Internal Medicine, Abant İzzet Baysal University Faculty of Medicine, Bolu, Turkey.
Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2014 Dec;42(6):341-7. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2014.65902. Epub 2014 Jul 11.
Researchers use a large number of information technology tools from the beginning until the publication of a scientific study. The aim of the study is to investigate the technology and data processing tool usage preferences of academics who produce scientific publications in the field of anaesthesiology.
A multiple-choice survey, including 18 questions regarding the use of technology to assess the preferences of academicians, was performed.
PubMed has been the most preferred article search portal, and the second is Google Academic. Medscape has become the most preferred medical innovation tracking website. Only 12% of academicians obtain a clinical trial registration number for their randomized clinical research. In total, 28% of respondents used the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials checklist in their clinical trials. Of all participants, 21% was using Dropbox and 9% was using Google-Drive for sharing files. Google Chrome was the most preferred internet browser (32.25%) for academic purposes. English language editing service was obtained from the Scribendi (21%) and Textcheck (12%) websites. Half of the academics were getting help from their specialist with a personal relationship, 27% was doing it themselves, and 24% was obtaining professional assistance for statistical requirements. Sixty percent of the participants were not using a reference editing program, and 21% was using EndNote. Nine percent of the academics were spending money for article writing, and the mean cost was 1287 Turkish Liras/year.
Academics in the field of anaesthesiology significantly benefit from technology and informatics tools to produce scientific publications.
从科学研究开始直至发表，研究人员会使用大量信息技术工具。本研究旨在调查麻醉学领域发表科学出版物的学者对技术和数据处理工具的使用偏好。
开展了一项多项选择题调查，包含18个关于技术使用情况的问题，以评估院士们的偏好。
PubMed是最受欢迎的文章搜索平台，其次是谷歌学术。Medscape已成为最受欢迎的医学创新追踪网站。只有12%的院士为其随机临床研究获取了临床试验注册号。总共有28%的受访者在其临床试验中使用了《报告试验的统一标准》清单。在所有参与者中，21%使用Dropbox，9%使用谷歌云盘来共享文件。谷歌浏览器是学术用途中最受欢迎的互联网浏览器（32.25%）。英语语言编辑服务来自Scribendi网站（21%）和Textcheck网站（12%）。一半的学者从与他们有私人关系的专家那里获得帮助，27%自己进行，24%因统计需求而寻求专业协助。60%的参与者未使用参考文献编辑程序，21%使用EndNote。9%的学者为撰写文章花钱，平均费用为每年1287土耳其里拉。
麻醉学领域的学者在撰写科学出版物时能从技术和信息工具中显著受益。
