Suppr超能文献

用于提高全静脉麻醉效果的不同麻醉性镇痛药的围手术期效应

Perioperative Effects of Different Narcotic Analgesics Used to Improve Effectiveness of Total Intravenous Anaesthesia.

作者信息

Saraçoğlu Ayten, Eti Zeynep, Konya Deniz, Kabahasanoğlu Kadir, Göğüş Fevzi Yılmaz

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Marmara University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.

Department of Neurosurgery, Marmara University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2016 Feb;44(1):21-5. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2016.80037. Epub 2016 Feb 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the depth of anaesthesia, perioperative haemodynamics, postoperative pain scores, analgesic consumption in patients receiving remifentanil- or alfentanil-based total intravenous anaesthesia for single-level lumbar discectomy.

METHODS

Seventy patients undergoing discectomy were enrolled in the study. Patients were intravenously administered an initial bolus dose of 2 mg kg(-1) propofol and 10 mcg kg(-1) alfentanil or 1 mcg kg(-1) remifentanil, followed by 6 mg kg(-1) h(-1) propofol and either 1 mcg kg(-1) min(-1) alfentanil or 0.25 mcg kg(-1) min(-1) remifentanil infusion. Bispectral index (BIS) values, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, end-tidal carbon dioxide and oxygen saturation were recorded. Postoperative pain scores at 0, 30 and 60 min were measured and recorded with additional opioid requirements.

RESULTS

Postoperative pain scores at 0 and 30 min, total analgesic consumption and requirement for additional analgesics were significantly high in the remifentanil group. After the first hour, the pain scores were not significantly different. Mean arterial blood pressure was significantly low at 45 and 60 min preoperatively in the remifentanil group. In the remifentanil group, heart rate at 15, 30, 45, 60 min were significantly lower than those in the alfentanil group. BIS values of the two groups were not significantly different at any measurement time point. BIS values of remifentanil group at 30, 45, 60, 90 and 180 min significantly increased compared with those at 15 min.

CONCLUSION

Alfentanil provided more stable BIS and haemodynamic values preoperatively and less opioid consumption, along with lower pain scores, during the early postoperative period compared with remifentanil in patients undergoing single-level discectomy.

摘要

目的

我们旨在评估接受瑞芬太尼或阿芬太尼全凭静脉麻醉的单节段腰椎间盘切除术患者的麻醉深度、围手术期血流动力学、术后疼痛评分及镇痛药用量。

方法

70例行椎间盘切除术的患者纳入本研究。患者静脉注射初始推注剂量的2mg·kg⁻¹丙泊酚和10μg·kg⁻¹阿芬太尼或1μg·kg⁻¹瑞芬太尼,随后以6mg·kg⁻¹·h⁻¹丙泊酚和1μg·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹阿芬太尼或0.25μg·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹瑞芬太尼持续输注。记录脑电双频指数(BIS)值、平均动脉压、心率、呼气末二氧化碳分压和血氧饱和度。测量并记录术后0、30和60分钟的疼痛评分以及额外的阿片类药物需求量。

结果

瑞芬太尼组术后0和30分钟的疼痛评分、总镇痛药用量及额外镇痛药需求量显著更高。术后1小时后,疼痛评分无显著差异。瑞芬太尼组术前45和60分钟时平均动脉血压显著降低。瑞芬太尼组15、30、45、60分钟时的心率显著低于阿芬太尼组。两组在任何测量时间点的BIS值均无显著差异。瑞芬太尼组30、45、60、90和180分钟时的BIS值与15分钟时相比显著升高。

结论

在接受单节段椎间盘切除术的患者中,与瑞芬太尼相比,阿芬太尼在术前提供更稳定的BIS和血流动力学值,术后早期镇痛药用量更少,疼痛评分更低。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

3
Remifentanil in critically ill cardiac patients.瑞芬太尼用于危重心血管疾病患者
Ann Card Anaesth. 2011 Jan-Apr;14(1):6-12. doi: 10.4103/0971-9784.74393.
9
Remifentanil vs alfentanil in the total intravenous anaesthesia for paediatric abdominal surgery.
Paediatr Anaesth. 2003 Oct;13(8):695-700. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.01124.x.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验