Suppr超能文献

在双谱指数或脑状态指数引导麻醉下丙泊酚的消耗量及恢复时间。

Propofol consumption and recovery times after bispectral index or cerebral state index guidance of anaesthesia.

作者信息

Delfino A E, Cortinez L I, Fierro C V, Muñoz H R

机构信息

Departamento de Anestesiología, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Marcoleta 367, PO Box 114-D, Santiago, Chile.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2009 Aug;103(2):255-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep138. Epub 2009 Jun 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We compared the propofol requirements and recovery times when either the bispectral index (BIS) monitor or the cerebral state monitor (CSM) is used to guide propofol anaesthesia.

METHODS

Forty patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were studied. All patients were monitored with both monitors and were randomly allocated into two groups according to the monitor used to titrate propofol administration. Propofol was administered to maintain BIS or CSM within 40 and 60. Propofol consumption and clinical markers of recovery were assessed after surgery.

RESULTS

In the CSM group, the values of cerebral state index (CSI) and BIS were 47 (5) and 38 (6), respectively (P=0.00054). In the BIS group, the values of CSI and BIS were 47 (5) and 45 (2), respectively (P=0.15). In the BIS group, the total amount of propofol used was lower [109 (20) microg kg(-1) min(-1)] than in the CSM group [130 (27) microg kg(-1) min(-1)] (P=0.018). The time to eye opening was lower in the BIS [7.2 (3.5) min] than in the CSM group [10.7 (6.6)] (P=0.038). There were no differences in fentanyl consumption, or in other clinical markers of recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with BIS, propofol anaesthesia guided with CSI resulted in 20% higher propofol doses. This, however, does not lead to clinically relevant differences in recovery times.

摘要

背景

我们比较了在使用脑电双频指数(BIS)监测仪或脑状态监测仪(CSM)来指导丙泊酚麻醉时,丙泊酚的需求量和恢复时间。

方法

对40例行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者进行研究。所有患者均使用这两种监测仪进行监测,并根据用于滴定丙泊酚给药的监测仪随机分为两组。给予丙泊酚以使BIS或CSM维持在40至60之间。术后评估丙泊酚的消耗量和恢复的临床指标。

结果

在CSM组中,脑状态指数(CSI)和BIS值分别为47(5)和38(6)(P = 0.00054)。在BIS组中,CSI和BIS值分别为47(5)和45(2)(P = 0.15)。在BIS组中,丙泊酚的总用量[109(20)μg·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹]低于CSM组[130(27)μg·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹](P = 0.018)。BIS组睁眼时间[7.2(3.5)分钟]比CSM组[10.7(6.6)分钟]短(P = 0.038)。芬太尼用量或其他恢复临床指标无差异。

结论

与BIS相比,用CSI指导的丙泊酚麻醉导致丙泊酚剂量高出20%。然而,这并未导致恢复时间出现临床相关差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验