Ibragimov Umedjon, Harnisch Jessica A, Nehl Eric J, He Na, Zheng Tony, Ding Yingying, Wong Frank Y
a Department of Behavioral Sciences & Health Education , Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University , Atlanta , GA , USA.
b Department of Epidemiology , Fudan University School of Public Health , Shanghai , China.
AIDS Care. 2017 Jan;29(1):125-131. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2016.1201191. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
Men who have sex with men (MSM) are the group at highest risk for HIV in China. Researchers have used various recruitment methods to reach this population hidden from the hetero-normative culture. To inform future recruitment strategies, we compared estimates of socio-demographic characteristics, HIV risk behaviors, depression, and intimate partner violence (IPV) across three samples of MSM and money boys in Shanghai, China. Data were collected from three community-based samples of MSM and money boys (n = 1352) recruited via respondent-driven sampling (RDS) (n = 404), community popular opinion leaders (CPOL) (n = 385), and Internet and venue-based sampling (VBS) (n = 546). Different recruitment methods generated samples with statistically significant differences among a number of socio-demographic characteristics, sexual behaviors, drug use, depression scores, and exposure to IPV. Specifically, RDS participants had lower education (p = .002), income levels (p < .001), and were more likely to report condomless sex with a woman (p < .001). CPOL participants were younger (p < .001), more likely to report lifetime condomless anal sex (p = .009), more than 10 male partners in the past 30 days (p < .001), and were less likely to experience violence by a male intimate partner (p = .001). VBS participants had lowest depression score (p = .005) and were more likely to report lifetime drug use (p = .003). Our findings reinforce that each recruitment method may reach a sub-group of MSM with a specific risk profile, so multiple methods may be needed to obtain a representative sample of MSM. Interventions may use specific recruitment methods to target certain segments of the MSM population.
男男性行为者(MSM)是中国感染艾滋病毒风险最高的群体。研究人员采用了各种招募方法来接触这个隐藏于异性规范文化之外的人群。为了为未来的招募策略提供参考,我们比较了中国上海男男性行为者和男公关三个样本在社会人口学特征、艾滋病毒风险行为、抑郁及亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)方面的估计情况。数据收集自通过应答驱动抽样(RDS)(n = 404)、社区民意领袖(CPOL)(n = 385)以及互联网和场所抽样(VBS)(n = 546)招募的男男性行为者和男公关的三个社区样本。不同的招募方法所产生的样本在一些社会人口学特征、性行为、吸毒情况、抑郁得分以及遭受亲密伴侣暴力方面存在统计学上的显著差异。具体而言,RDS参与者受教育程度较低(p = 0.002)、收入水平较低(p < 0.001),且更有可能报告与女性发生无保护性行为(p < 0.001)。CPOL参与者更年轻(p < 0.001),更有可能报告终生无保护肛交(p = 0.009),在过去30天内有超过10个男性伴侣(p < 0.001),且遭受男性亲密伴侣暴力的可能性较小(p = 0.001)。VBS参与者的抑郁得分最低(p = 0.005),且更有可能报告终生吸毒情况(p = 0.003)。我们的研究结果强化了这样一个观点,即每种招募方法可能接触到具有特定风险特征的男男性行为者亚群体,因此可能需要多种方法来获得具有代表性的男男性行为者样本。干预措施可以采用特定的招募方法来针对男男性行为者群体中的某些部分。