Leli Christian, Castronari Roberto, Levorato Lucia, Luciano Eugenio, Pistoni Eleonora, Perito Stefano, Bozza Silvia, Mencacci Antonella
Microbiology Section, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Perugia, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy.
Infez Med. 2016 Jun 1;24(2):112-6.
Vaginal trichomoniasis is a sexually transmitted infection caused by Trichomonas vaginalis, a flagellated protozoan. Diagnosis of T. vaginalis infection is mainly performed by wet mount microscopy, with a sensitivity ranging from 38% to 82%, compared to culture, still considered the gold standard. Commercial immunochromatographic tests for monoclonal-antibody-based detection have been introduced as alternative methods for diagnosis of T. vaginalis infection and have been reported in some studies to be more sensitive than wet mount. Real-time PCR methods have been recently developed, with optimal sensitivity and specificity. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether there is a molecular sensitivity threshold for both wet mount and imunochromatographic assays. To this aim, a total of 1487 low-risk childbearing women (median age 32 years, interquartile range 27-37) were included in the study, and underwent vaginal swab for T. vaginalis detection by means of a quantitative real-time PCR assay, wet mount and an immunochromatographic test. Upon comparing the results, prevalence values observed were 1.3% for real-time PCR, 0.5% for microscopic examination, and 0.8% for the immunochromatographic test. Compared to real-time PCR, wet mount sensitivity was 40% (95% confidence interval 19.1% to 63.9%) and specificity was 100% (95% CI 99.7% to 100%). The sensitivity and specificity of the immunochromatographic assay were 57.9% (95% CI 33.5% to 79.8%) and 99.9% (95% CI 99.6% to 100%), respectively. Evaluation of the wet mount results and those of immunochromatographic assay detection in relation to the number of T. vaginalis DNA copies detected in vaginal samples showed that the lower identification threshold for both wet mount (chi-square 6.1; P = 0.016) and the immunochromatographic assay (chi-square 10.7; P = 0.002) was ≥100 copies of T. vaginalis DNA/5 mcl of eluted DNA.
阴道毛滴虫病是由阴道毛滴虫这种有鞭毛的原生动物引起的性传播感染。阴道毛滴虫感染的诊断主要通过湿片显微镜检查进行,其灵敏度在38%至82%之间,而培养法仍被视为金标准。基于单克隆抗体检测的商业免疫层析试验已作为诊断阴道毛滴虫感染的替代方法被引入,并且在一些研究中报道其比湿片检查更敏感。实时聚合酶链反应(PCR)方法最近已被开发出来,具有最佳的灵敏度和特异性。本研究的目的是评估湿片检查和免疫层析试验是否存在分子灵敏度阈值。为了实现这一目标,共有1487名低风险育龄妇女(中位年龄32岁,四分位间距27 - 37岁)被纳入研究,并通过定量实时PCR检测、湿片检查和免疫层析试验进行阴道拭子检测阴道毛滴虫。在比较结果时,实时PCR观察到的患病率为1.3%,显微镜检查为0.5%,免疫层析试验为0.8%。与实时PCR相比,湿片检查的灵敏度为40%(95%置信区间19.1%至63.9%),特异性为100%(95%置信区间99.7%至100%)。免疫层析试验的灵敏度和特异性分别为57.9%(95%置信区间33.5%至79.8%)和99.9%(95%置信区间99.6%至100%)。根据阴道样本中检测到的阴道毛滴虫DNA拷贝数评估湿片检查结果和免疫层析试验检测结果表明,湿片检查(卡方值6.1;P = 0.016)和免疫层析试验(卡方值10.7;P = 0.002)的较低识别阈值均为≥100拷贝的阴道毛滴虫DNA/5微升洗脱DNA。