• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

携带BRCA突变的女性在未行子宫切除的降低风险输卵管卵巢切除术后发生子宫癌

Uterine Cancer After Risk-Reducing Salpingo-oophorectomy Without Hysterectomy in Women With BRCA Mutations.

作者信息

Shu Catherine A, Pike Malcolm C, Jotwani Anjali R, Friebel Tara M, Soslow Robert A, Levine Douglas A, Nathanson Katherine L, Konner Jason A, Arnold Angela G, Bogomolniy Faina, Dao Fanny, Olvera Narciso, Bancroft Elizabeth K, Goldfrank Deborah J, Stadler Zsofia K, Robson Mark E, Brown Carol L, Leitao Mario M, Abu-Rustum Nadeem R, Aghajanian Carol A, Blum Joanne L, Neuhausen Susan L, Garber Judy E, Daly Mary B, Isaacs Claudine, Eeles Rosalind A, Ganz Patricia A, Barakat Richard R, Offit Kenneth, Domchek Susan M, Rebbeck Timothy R, Kauff Noah D

机构信息

Division of Hematology-Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.

出版信息

JAMA Oncol. 2016 Nov 1;2(11):1434-1440. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.1820.

DOI:10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.1820
PMID:27367496
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5594920/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The link between BRCA mutations and uterine cancer is unclear. Therefore, although risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) is standard treatment among women with BRCA mutations (BRCA+ women), the role of concomitant hysterectomy is controversial.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the risk for uterine cancer and distribution of specific histologic subtypes in BRCA+ women after RRSO without hysterectomy.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This multicenter prospective cohort study included 1083 women with a deleterious BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation identified from January 1, 1995, to December 31, 2011, at 9 academic medical centers in the United States and the United Kingdom who underwent RRSO without a prior or concomitant hysterectomy. Of these, 627 participants were BRCA1+; 453, BRCA2+; and 3, both. Participants were prospectively followed up for a median 5.1 (interquartile range [IQR], 3.0-8.4) years after ascertainment, BRCA testing, or RRSO (whichever occurred last). Follow up data available through October 14, 2014, were included in the analyses. Censoring occurred at uterine cancer diagnosis, hysterectomy, last follow-up, or death. New cancers were categorized by histologic subtype, and available tumors were analyzed for loss of the wild-type BRCA gene and/or protein expression.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Incidence of uterine corpus cancer in BRCA+ women who underwent RRSO without hysterectomy compared with rates expected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database.

RESULTS

Among the 1083 women women who underwent RRSO without hysterectomy at a median age 45.6 (IQR: 40.9 - 52.5), 8 incident uterine cancers were observed (4.3 expected; observed to expected [O:E] ratio, 1.9; 95% CI, 0.8-3.7; P = .09). No increased risk for endometrioid endometrial carcinoma or sarcoma was found after stratifying by subtype. Five serous and/or serous-like (serous/serous-like) endometrial carcinomas were observed (4 BRCA1+ and 1 BRCA2+) 7.2 to 12.9 years after RRSO (BRCA1: 0.18 expected [O:E ratio, 22.2; 95% CI, 6.1-56.9; P < .001]; BRCA2: 0.16 expected [O:E ratio, 6.4; 95% CI, 0.2-35.5; P = .15]). Tumor analyses confirmed loss of the wild-type BRCA1 gene and/or protein expression in all 3 available serous/serous-like BRCA1+ tumors.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Although the overall risk for uterine cancer after RRSO was not increased, the risk for serous/serous-like endometrial carcinoma was increased in BRCA1+ women. This risk should be considered when discussing the advantages and risks of hysterectomy at the time of RRSO in BRCA1+ women.

摘要

重要性

BRCA突变与子宫癌之间的联系尚不清楚。因此,尽管降低风险的输卵管卵巢切除术(RRSO)是BRCA突变女性(BRCA+女性)的标准治疗方法,但同时进行子宫切除术的作用仍存在争议。

目的

确定未行子宫切除术的RRSO术后BRCA+女性患子宫癌的风险及特定组织学亚型的分布情况。

设计、设置和参与者:这项多中心前瞻性队列研究纳入了1995年1月1日至2011年12月31日期间在美国和英国的9个学术医疗中心确诊为有害BRCA1或BRCA2突变且未进行过子宫切除术或同期未行子宫切除术的1083名女性。其中,627名参与者为BRCA1+;453名,BRCA2+;3名,两者皆有。参与者在确诊、BRCA检测或RRSO(以最后发生者为准)后进行了中位时间为5.1年(四分位间距[IQR],3.0 - 8.4年)的前瞻性随访。分析纳入了截至2014年10月14日的随访数据。在子宫癌诊断、子宫切除术、最后一次随访或死亡时进行截尾。新癌症按组织学亚型分类,并对可用肿瘤进行野生型BRCA基因缺失和/或蛋白表达分析。

主要结局和指标

未行子宫切除术的RRSO术后BRCA+女性子宫体癌的发病率与监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库预期发病率的比较。

结果

在1083名未行子宫切除术的RRSO术后女性中,中位年龄为45.6岁(IQR:40.9 - 52.5),观察到8例子宫癌(预期4.3例;观察值与预期值[O:E]之比为1.9;95%CI,0.8 - 3.7;P = 0.09)。按亚型分层后,未发现子宫内膜样腺癌或肉瘤风险增加。RRSO术后7.2至12.9年观察到5例浆液性和/或浆液样(浆液/浆液样)子宫内膜癌(4例BRCA1+和1例BRCA2+)(BRCA1:预期0.18例[O:E比,22.2;95%CI,6.1 - 56.9;P < 0.001];BRCA2:预期0.16例[O:E比,6.4;95%CI,0.2 - 35.5;P = 0.15])。肿瘤分析证实所有3例可用的浆液/浆液样BRCA1+肿瘤中野生型BRCA1基因和/或蛋白表达缺失。

结论和相关性

尽管RRSO术后子宫癌的总体风险未增加,但BRCA1+女性浆液/浆液样子宫内膜癌的风险增加。在讨论BRCA1+女性RRSO时子宫切除术的利弊时应考虑到这一风险。

相似文献

1
Uterine Cancer After Risk-Reducing Salpingo-oophorectomy Without Hysterectomy in Women With BRCA Mutations.携带BRCA突变的女性在未行子宫切除的降低风险输卵管卵巢切除术后发生子宫癌
JAMA Oncol. 2016 Nov 1;2(11):1434-1440. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.1820.
2
Mortality reduction and cost-effectiveness of performing hysterectomy at the time of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy for prophylaxis against serous/serous-like uterine cancers in BRCA1 mutation carriers.对于携带BRCA1突变的女性,在进行降低风险的输卵管卵巢切除术时同时行子宫切除术以预防浆液性/浆液样子宫癌的死亡率降低情况及成本效益。
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Jun;145(3):549-554. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.03.025. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
3
Endometrium is not the primary site of origin of pelvic high-grade serous carcinoma in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers.BRCA1 或 BRCA2 突变携带者的盆部高级别浆液性癌并非起源于子宫内膜。
Mod Pathol. 2013 Apr;26(4):572-8. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2012.169. Epub 2012 Oct 19.
4
Risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.对携带BRCA1或BRCA2基因突变的女性进行降低风险的双侧输卵管卵巢切除术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 24;8(8):CD012464. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012464.pub2.
5
Occult and subsequent cancer incidence following risk-reducing surgery in BRCA mutation carriers.BRCA 突变携带者进行降低风险手术后的隐匿性及后续癌症发病率。
Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Nov;143(2):231-235. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.08.336. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
6
Risk of endometrial cancer after RRSO in BRCA 1/2 carriers: a multicentre cohort study.BRCA1/2 携带者 RRSO 后子宫内膜癌风险:一项多中心队列研究。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2024 Apr;26(4):1033-1037. doi: 10.1007/s12094-023-03312-4. Epub 2023 Sep 8.
7
Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy for the prevention of BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated breast and gynecologic cancer: a multicenter, prospective study.降低风险的输卵管卵巢切除术预防BRCA1和BRCA2相关乳腺癌及妇科癌症:一项多中心前瞻性研究
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Mar 10;26(8):1331-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.9626. Epub 2008 Feb 11.
8
Risk reducing surgery with peritoneal staging in BRCA1-2 mutation carriers. A prospective study.BRCA1-2基因携带者行腹膜分期的降低风险手术:一项前瞻性研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2022 Dec;48(12):2539-2544. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.07.007. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
9
Uterine cancer in Jewish Israeli BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.以色列裔犹太 BRCA1/2 基因突变携带者的子宫癌。
Cancer. 2019 Mar 1;125(5):698-703. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31842. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
10
Prophylactic risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA mutation carriers: what is going on in a region of northern Italy?预防性降低风险的输卵管卵巢切除术在 BRCA 基因突变携带者中的应用:意大利北部地区的情况如何?
Maturitas. 2021 Jan;143:59-64. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2020.08.011. Epub 2020 Aug 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Breast cancer as the first primary malignancy: clinical pathological characteristics of common cancer combinations.乳腺癌作为首发原发性恶性肿瘤:常见癌症组合的临床病理特征
Discov Oncol. 2025 Aug 23;16(1):1599. doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-03427-w.
2
Current insights into breast and ovarian cancer risk: a contemporary review.乳腺癌和卵巢癌风险的当前见解:一项当代综述。
Minerva Surg. 2025 Aug;80(4):334-353. doi: 10.23736/S2724-5691.25.10651-5.
3
Maintenance with niraparib in patients with stage III, stage IV, chemo-naïve recurrent or platinum-sensitive recurrent uterine serous carcinoma: study protocol for a phase II clinical trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of Hysterectomy on Sexual Function.子宫切除术对性功能的影响。
Curr Sex Health Rep. 2014;6(4):244-251. doi: 10.1007/s11930-014-0029-3.
2
Uterine carcinosarcoma: A review of the literature.子宫癌肉瘤:文献回顾。
Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Jun;137(3):581-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.03.041. Epub 2015 Mar 21.
3
Comparative effectiveness of robotically assisted compared with laparoscopic adnexal surgery for benign gynecologic disease.机器人辅助与腹腔镜附件手术治疗良性妇科疾病的比较效果。
尼拉帕利用于 III 期、IV 期、未经化疗的复发性或铂敏感复发性子宫浆液性癌患者的维持治疗:一项 II 期临床试验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 5;15(6):e087115. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087115.
4
Occurrence of Malignancies Other than Breast and Ovarian Cancer in Female Carriers of a Germline Pathogenic Variant.携带生殖系致病变异的女性中除乳腺癌和卵巢癌以外的其他恶性肿瘤的发生情况
Cancers (Basel). 2025 May 17;17(10):1687. doi: 10.3390/cancers17101687.
5
Antitumor activity of rucaparib plus PLX038A in serous endometrial carcinoma.鲁卡帕尼联合PLX038A在浆液性子宫内膜癌中的抗肿瘤活性。
J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2025 May 19;44(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s13046-025-03406-7.
6
Models for predicting risk of endometrial cancer: a systematic review.子宫内膜癌风险预测模型:一项系统评价。
Diagn Progn Res. 2025 Feb 4;9(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s41512-024-00178-0.
7
Comparative sequencing study of mismatch repair and homology-directed repair genes in endometrial cancer and breast cancer patients from Kazakhstan.哈萨克斯坦子宫内膜癌和乳腺癌患者错配修复与同源重组修复基因的比较测序研究
Int J Cancer. 2025 Feb 15;156(4):764-775. doi: 10.1002/ijc.35215. Epub 2024 Oct 14.
8
Germline genetic testing reveals pathogenic variants in uterine serous carcinoma patients.种系基因检测揭示了子宫浆液性癌患者的致病变异。
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2024 Sep 2;55:101498. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2024.101498. eCollection 2024 Oct.
9
The risk of endocrine interventions in carriers of a genetic predisposition for breast and gynecologic cancers: recommendations of the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer.携带乳腺癌和妇科癌症遗传易感性者接受内分泌干预的风险:德国遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌协会的建议。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2024 Sep 11;150(9):417. doi: 10.1007/s00432-024-05936-7.
10
Prevention of Ovarian Cancer: Where are We Now and Where are We Going?卵巢癌的预防:我们现在在哪里,我们将走向何方?
Curr Oncol Rep. 2024 Nov;26(11):1355-1366. doi: 10.1007/s11912-024-01587-6. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Nov;124(5):886-896. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000483.
4
Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma.子宫内膜癌的综合基因组特征分析。
Nature. 2013 May 2;497(7447):67-73. doi: 10.1038/nature12113.
5
The incidence of endometrial cancer in women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations: an international prospective cohort study.BRCA1 和 BRCA2 基因突变女性的子宫内膜癌发病率:一项国际前瞻性队列研究。
Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Jul;130(1):127-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.03.027. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
6
Etiologic heterogeneity in endometrial cancer: evidence from a Gynecologic Oncology Group trial.子宫内膜癌的病因异质性:妇科肿瘤学组试验的证据。
Gynecol Oncol. 2013 May;129(2):277-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.02.023. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
7
Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease.机器人辅助与腹腔镜子宫切除术治疗良性妇科疾病的比较。
JAMA. 2013 Feb 20;309(7):689-98. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.186.
8
BRCA1 immunohistochemistry in a molecularly characterized cohort of ovarian high-grade serous carcinomas.BRCA1 免疫组化在分子特征明确的卵巢高级别浆液性癌队列中的应用。
Am J Surg Pathol. 2013 Jan;37(1):138-46. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31826cabbd.
9
Endometrium is not the primary site of origin of pelvic high-grade serous carcinoma in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers.BRCA1 或 BRCA2 突变携带者的盆部高级别浆液性癌并非起源于子宫内膜。
Mod Pathol. 2013 Apr;26(4):572-8. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2012.169. Epub 2012 Oct 19.
10
BRCA1, TP53, and CHEK2 germline mutations in uterine serous carcinoma.BRCA1、TP53 和 CHEK2 种系突变与子宫浆液性癌相关。
Cancer. 2013 Jan 15;119(2):332-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27720. Epub 2012 Jul 18.