Soares Diana Gabriela, Basso Fernanda Gonçalves, Scheffel Débora Lopes Sales, Giro Elisa Maria Aparecida, de Souza Costa Carlos Alberto, Hebling Josimeri
Gen Dent. 2016 Jul-Aug;64(4):33-40.
This study evaluated whether a restorative resin-modified glass ionomer cement, Vitremer (VM), would be biocompatible with pulp tissue when used as a liner in very deep cavities prepared in young human permanent teeth. Two dental cements in current use as liner materials, Vitrebond (VB) and Dycal (DY), were compared to VM. Class V cavities were prepared in 36 sound premolars that were scheduled for extraction, and the cavity floor was lined with the restorative cement (VM) or a liner/base control cement (VB or DY). For VM specimens, the cavity floor was pretreated with a primer (polyacrylic acid plus 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate). Teeth were extracted after 7 or 30 days and processed for microscopic evaluation. In the VM group, inward diffusion of dental material components through dentinal tubules, associated with disruption of the odontoblastic layer, moderate to intense inflammatory response, and resorption of inner dentin, was observed in 2 teeth at 7 days. These histologic features were observed in 1 tooth at 30 days. In the VB group, mild inflammatory reactions and tissue disorganization observed at 7 days were resolved at 30 days. No pulpal damage occurred in the DY specimens. Of the materials tested, only Vitremer was not considered biocompatible, because it caused persistent pulpal damage when applied in very deep cavities (remaining dentin thickness less than 0.3 mm).
本研究评估了一种修复性树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀(Vitremer,VM)在用于制备年轻恒牙的极深窝洞的衬层时,是否与牙髓组织具有生物相容性。将两种目前用作衬层材料的牙科水门汀(Vitremer Bond,VB和Dycal,DY)与VM进行比较。在36颗计划拔除的健康前磨牙上制备V类洞,并在洞底衬以修复性水门汀(VM)或衬层/基底对照水门汀(VB或DY)。对于VM标本,洞底先用底漆(聚丙烯酸加甲基丙烯酸羟乙酯)预处理。7天或30天后拔除牙齿并进行显微镜评估。在VM组中,7天时在2颗牙齿中观察到牙科材料成分通过牙本质小管向内扩散,伴有成牙本质细胞层破坏、中度至重度炎症反应和内层牙本质吸收。30天时在1颗牙齿中观察到这些组织学特征。在VB组中,7天时观察到的轻度炎症反应和组织紊乱在30天时得到缓解。DY标本未发生牙髓损伤。在所测试的材料中,只有Vitremer不被认为具有生物相容性,因为当应用于极深窝洞(剩余牙本质厚度小于0.3mm)时,它会导致持续性牙髓损伤。