Suppr超能文献

电击威胁改善认知表现的神经基础。

The neural basis of improved cognitive performance by threat of shock.

作者信息

Torrisi Salvatore, Robinson Oliver, O'Connell Katherine, Davis Andrew, Balderston Nicholas, Ernst Monique, Grillon Christian

机构信息

Section on the Neurobiology of Fear and Anxiety, NIMH, Bethesda, MD, USA,

Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2016 Nov;11(11):1677-1686. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsw088. Epub 2016 Jun 30.

Abstract

Anxiety can have both detrimental and facilitatory cognitive effects. This study investigates the neural substrates of a replicated facilitatory effect of anxiety on sustained attention and response inhibition. This effect consisted of improved performance on the Sustained Attention to Response Task (a Go-NoGo task consisting of 91% Go and 9% NoGo trials) in threat (unpredictable electrical shock) vs safe (no shock) conditions. This study uses the same experimental design with fMRI and relies on an event-related analysis of BOLD signal changes. Findings reveal that threat-related cognitive facilitation (improved NoGo accuracy) is associated with greater activation of a right-lateralized frontoparietal group of regions previously implicated in sustained attention and response inhibition. Moreover, these same regions show decreased activation in the Go trials preceding NoGo errors. During NoGo trials, striatal activity is also greater in the threat vs safe condition, consistent with the notion of enhanced inhibitory processing under threat. These findings identify potential mechanisms by which threat of unpredictable shock can facilitate distinct cognitive functions. A greater understanding of the complex interaction of the anxious state and cognitive processes may have critical clinical implications.

摘要

焦虑会对认知产生有害和促进两种影响。本研究调查了焦虑对持续注意力和反应抑制的重复性促进作用的神经基础。这种作用表现为在威胁(不可预测的电击)与安全(无电击)条件下,在持续注意力反应任务(一种包含91%的“执行”和9%的“不执行”试验的“执行-不执行”任务)中表现得到改善。本研究采用相同的实验设计并结合功能磁共振成像(fMRI),并依赖于对血氧水平依赖(BOLD)信号变化的事件相关分析。研究结果显示,与威胁相关的认知促进作用(提高“不执行”的准确性)与先前涉及持续注意力和反应抑制的右侧额顶叶区域组的更大激活有关。此外,在“不执行”错误之前的“执行”试验中,这些相同区域的激活减少。在“不执行”试验期间,与安全条件相比,威胁条件下纹状体的活动也更强,这与威胁下抑制性加工增强的观点一致。这些发现确定了不可预测的电击威胁能够促进不同认知功能的潜在机制。对焦虑状态与认知过程复杂相互作用的更深入理解可能具有关键的临床意义。

相似文献

1
The neural basis of improved cognitive performance by threat of shock.
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2016 Nov;11(11):1677-1686. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsw088. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
2
Anxiety, cognitive self-evaluation and performance: ERP correlates.
J Anxiety Disord. 2009 Dec;23(8):1132-8. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.07.018. Epub 2009 Jul 22.
3
Neural bases of social anxiety disorder: emotional reactivity and cognitive regulation during social and physical threat.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009 Feb;66(2):170-80. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2008.525.
6
Anxiety, a benefit and detriment to cognition: behavioral and magnetoencephalographic evidence from a mixed-saccade task.
Brain Cogn. 2012 Apr;78(3):257-67. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2012.01.002. Epub 2012 Jan 29.
7
N2 event-related potential correlates of response inhibition in an auditory Go/Nogo task.
Int J Psychophysiol. 2006 Aug;61(2):279-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.09.006. Epub 2005 Nov 17.
8
Impact of state anxiety on the interaction between threat monitoring and cognition.
Neuroimage. 2012 Jan 16;59(2):1912-23. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.102. Epub 2011 Sep 13.
9
Neural responses to auditory stimulus deviance under threat of electric shock revealed by spatially-filtered magnetoencephalography.
Neuroimage. 2007 Aug 1;37(1):282-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.055. Epub 2007 May 18.
10
The association of dispositional anxiety with the NoGo N2 under relaxation instruction vs. speed/accuracy instruction.
Biol Psychol. 2024 Oct;192:108850. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2024.108850. Epub 2024 Jul 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Neural patterns of threat response in adolescents predict vulnerability for and resilience against internalizing symptoms during COVID-19 waves.
Neuroimage Rep. 2023 May 29;3(3):100177. doi: 10.1016/j.ynirp.2023.100177. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Emotional, physiological, biochemical, and behavioral responses to acute stress and uncertainty in military personnel.
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 21;19(11):e0312443. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312443. eCollection 2024.
3
Exploring the use of visual predictions in social scenarios while under anticipatory threat.
Sci Rep. 2024 May 13;14(1):10913. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61682-3.
4
Observational learning of threat-related attentional bias.
Cogn Emot. 2024 Aug;38(5):789-800. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2024.2317917. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
6
Neither Threat of Shock nor Acute Psychosocial Stress Affects Ambiguity Attitudes.
Affect Sci. 2022;3(2):425-437. doi: 10.1007/s42761-022-00109-6. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
7
The Posterior Cingulate Cortex Reflects the Impact of Anxiety on Drift Rates During Cognitive Processing.
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2023 Apr;8(4):445-451. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2022.03.010. Epub 2022 Apr 2.
8
Patients with anxiety disorders rely on bilateral dlPFC activation during verbal working memory.
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2020 Dec 24;15(12):1288-1298. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaa146.
9
10
Worry alters speed-accuracy tradeoffs but does not impair sustained attention.
Behav Res Ther. 2020 May;128:103597. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2020.103597. Epub 2020 Feb 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Anxiety, emotional distraction, and attentional control in the Stroop task.
Emotion. 2016 Apr;16(3):293-300. doi: 10.1037/emo0000129. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
2
Functional Connectivity under Anticipation of Shock: Correlates of Trait Anxious Affect versus Induced Anxiety.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2015 Sep;27(9):1840-53. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00825. Epub 2015 May 11.
3
Effect of attention control on sustained attention during induced anxiety.
Cogn Emot. 2016;30(4):700-12. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2015.1024614. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
4
Spider stimuli improve response inhibition.
Conscious Cogn. 2015 May;33:406-13. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.02.014. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
5
Resting state networks distinguish human ventral tegmental area from substantia nigra.
Neuroimage. 2014 Oct 15;100:580-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.047. Epub 2014 Jun 27.
6
Opposing effects of appetitive and aversive cues on go/no-go behavior and motor excitability.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Aug;26(8):1851-60. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00585. Epub 2014 Feb 24.
7
Structural and functional bases of inhibited temperament.
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 Dec;9(12):2049-58. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsu019. Epub 2014 Feb 3.
8
Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex: one decade on.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 Apr;18(4):177-85. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.12.003. Epub 2014 Jan 15.
9
Unraveling the anxious mind: anxiety, worry, and frontal engagement in sustained attention versus off-task processing.
Cereb Cortex. 2015 Mar;25(3):609-18. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht248. Epub 2013 Sep 22.
10
Involvement of the dorsal and ventral attention networks in oddball stimulus processing: a meta-analysis.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 May;35(5):2265-84. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22326. Epub 2013 Jul 30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验