• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探究在预期威胁下的社会情境中使用视觉预测。

Exploring the use of visual predictions in social scenarios while under anticipatory threat.

机构信息

William James Center for Research, Department of Education and Psychology, University of Aveiro, Universidade de Aveiro, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal.

Department of Education and Psychology, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 May 13;14(1):10913. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61682-3.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-61682-3
PMID:38740937
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11091092/
Abstract

One of the less recognized effects of anxiety lies in perception alterations caused by how one weighs both sensory evidence and contextual cues. Here, we investigated how anxiety affects our ability to use social cues to anticipate the others' actions. We adapted a paradigm to assess expectations in social scenarios, whereby participants were asked to identify the presence of agents therein, while supported by contextual cues from another agent. Participants (N = 66) underwent this task under safe and threat-of-shock conditions. We extracted both criterion and sensitivity measures as well as gaze data. Our analysis showed that whilst the type of action had the expected effect, threat-of-shock had no effect over criterion and sensitivity. Although showing similar dwell times, gaze exploration of the contextual cue was associated with shorter fixation durations whilst participants were under threat. Our findings suggest that anxiety does not appear to influence the use of expectations in social scenarios.

摘要

焦虑的一个不太被人认识到的影响在于感知改变,这是由人们如何权衡感官证据和上下文线索引起的。在这里,我们研究了焦虑如何影响我们利用社会线索来预测他人行为的能力。我们改编了一个范式来评估社交场景中的期望,让参与者在另一个代理的上下文线索的支持下,识别其中的代理存在。参与者(N=66)在安全和受电击威胁的条件下完成了这项任务。我们提取了判断标准和敏感性指标以及注视数据。我们的分析表明,虽然动作类型有预期的效果,但威胁对判断标准和敏感性没有影响。尽管注视时间相似,但当参与者处于威胁之下时,对上下文线索的注视探索与较短的注视持续时间相关。我们的研究结果表明,焦虑似乎不会影响在社交场景中使用期望。

相似文献

1
Exploring the use of visual predictions in social scenarios while under anticipatory threat.探究在预期威胁下的社会情境中使用视觉预测。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 13;14(1):10913. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61682-3.
2
The effect of anxiety and its interplay with social cues when perceiving aggressive behaviours.焦虑在感知攻击性行为时的影响及其与社会线索的相互作用。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2025 Jun;78(6):1124-1138. doi: 10.1177/17470218241258209. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
3
It's all in the anticipation: How perception of threat is enhanced in anxiety.一切都在于预期:焦虑如何增强对威胁的感知。
Emotion. 2016 Apr;16(3):320-7. doi: 10.1037/emo0000098. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
4
Expectations regarding action sequences modulate electrophysiological correlates of the gaze-cueing effect.关于动作序列的预期会调节注视线索效应的电生理相关指标。
Psychophysiology. 2017 Jul;54(7):942-954. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12854. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
5
Looking ahead: Anticipatory cueing of attention to objects others will look at.展望未来:对他人将看向的物体进行注意力的预期提示。
Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Jan-Oct;7(1-4):74-81. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2015.1053443. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
6
Improved Perception of Aggression Under (un)Related Threat of Shock.(无关)电击威胁下对攻击行为感知的改善。
Cogn Sci. 2024 May;48(5):e13451. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13451.
7
Unconscious processing of coarse visual information during anticipatory threat.预期威胁时对粗糙视觉信息的无意识加工。
Conscious Cogn. 2019 Apr;70:50-56. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2019.01.018. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
8
Anticipatory anxiety hinders detection of a second target in dual-target search.预期性焦虑会阻碍在双重目标搜索中对第二个目标的检测。
Psychol Sci. 2011 Jul;22(7):866-71. doi: 10.1177/0956797611412393. Epub 2011 Jun 13.
9
Purpose-Dependent Consequences of Temporal Expectations Serving Perception and Action.目的依赖的时间预期对感知和行动的影响。
J Neurosci. 2020 Oct 7;40(41):7877-7886. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1134-20.2020. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
10
Phasic and sustained brain responses in the amygdala and the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis during threat anticipation.在威胁预期期间杏仁核和终纹床核的相位性和持续性脑反应。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2016 Mar;37(3):1091-102. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23088. Epub 2015 Dec 17.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of anxiety and its interplay with social cues when perceiving aggressive behaviours.焦虑在感知攻击性行为时的影响及其与社会线索的相互作用。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2025 Jun;78(6):1124-1138. doi: 10.1177/17470218241258209. Epub 2024 Jul 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Acute threat enhances perceptual sensitivity without affecting the decision criterion.急性威胁提高了知觉敏感性,而不影响决策标准。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 31;12(1):9071. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11664-0.
2
Multidimensional assessment of anxiety through the State-Trait Inventory for Cognitive and Somatic Anxiety (STICSA): From dimensionality to response prediction across emotional contexts.通过认知和躯体焦虑状态特质问卷(STICSA)对焦虑进行多维评估:从维度到跨情绪环境的反应预测。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 25;17(1):e0262960. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262960. eCollection 2022.
3
Dysfunctional frontal activation of mismatch negativity in panic disorder: A magnetoencephalographic study.
惊恐障碍中错误相关负波的额区功能失调激活:一项脑磁图研究。
J Affect Disord. 2021 Feb 1;280(Pt A):211-218. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.11.013. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
4
Threat-of-shock decreases emotional interference on affective stroop performance in healthy controls and anxiety patients.威胁性刺激可降低健康对照组和焦虑症患者在情绪 Stroop 任务中的情绪干扰。
Eur J Neurosci. 2022 May;55(9-10):2519-2528. doi: 10.1111/ejn.14624. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
5
Auditory perceptual learning is not affected by anticipatory anxiety in the healthy population except for highly anxious individuals: EEG evidence.听觉感知学习不受健康人群预期性焦虑的影响,除了高度焦虑个体:脑电图证据。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2019 Jul;130(7):1135-1143. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.04.010. Epub 2019 Apr 27.
6
Heightened sensitivity to panic-related sounds with reduced sensitivity to neutral sounds in preattentive processing among panic patients.惊恐障碍患者在非注意加工过程中对惊恐相关声音的敏感性增强,对中性声音的敏感性降低。
J Affect Disord. 2019 May 1;250:204-209. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.03.019. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
7
PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy.心理物理学 2 版:简单易用的行为实验。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Feb;51(1):195-203. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y.
8
Increased functional coupling of the left amygdala and medial prefrontal cortex during the perception of communicative point-light stimuli.在感知交际性点光刺激时,左杏仁核和内侧前额叶皮层的功能连接增加。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2019 Jan 4;14(1):97-107. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsy105.
9
Psychometric properties of the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale in a large cross-cultural Spanish and Portuguese speaking sample.Liebowitz 社交焦虑量表在跨文化西班牙语和葡萄牙语大样本中的心理测量特性。
Braz J Psychiatry. 2019 Mar-Apr;41(2):122-130. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2018-0006. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
10
The Neural Correlates of Hierarchical Predictions for Perceptual Decisions.层级预测对知觉决策的神经关联。
J Neurosci. 2018 May 23;38(21):5008-5021. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2901-17.2018. Epub 2018 Apr 30.