Medical Psychological Institute, Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China; Third Hospital of Quanzhou, Quanzhou, China.
Medical Psychological Institute, Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Psychiatry Res. 2016 Sep 30;243:71-4. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.04.110. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
The present study examined whether people with high gambling-related cognitive bias are more likely to have higher levels of impulsivity than are those with low gambling-related cognitive bias. We used Barratt Impulsiveness Scale version 11, Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire and the Iowa gambling task to explore differences in impulsivity between high and low gambling-related cognitive bias groups. Extreme group design was applied. 110 participants (high gambling related cognition group=58, low one=52) were recruited to complete the gambling related cognition scale, impulsivity self-rating scales and Iowa gambling task. Impulsivity self-rating scores were higher among subjects with high than among those with low gambling-related cognitive bias. Compared with individuals with low gambling-related cognitive bias, those with high levels of such bias showed greater degrees of trait impulsivity. We are unable to identify group differences on IGT. State and trait impulsivity may be dissociated.
本研究旨在探讨高赌博相关认知偏差的个体是否比低赌博相关认知偏差的个体更容易表现出更高的冲动性。我们使用巴瑞特冲动量表第 11 版、祖克曼-库尔曼人格问卷和爱荷华赌博任务来探索高和低赌博相关认知偏差组之间冲动性的差异。采用极端组设计。招募了 110 名参与者（高赌博相关认知组=58 名，低赌博相关认知组=52 名）完成赌博相关认知量表、冲动自评量表和爱荷华赌博任务。高赌博相关认知组的冲动自评得分高于低赌博相关认知组。与低赌博相关认知偏差的个体相比，高赌博相关认知偏差的个体表现出更大程度的特质冲动性。我们无法确定 IGT 上的组间差异。状态和特质冲动可能是分离的。
