Asida S M, Ahmed S S
Department of Anesthesia, Qena Faculty of Medicine, South Valley University, Qena, Egypt.
Department of Public Health, Qena Faculty of Medicine, South Valley University, Qena, Egypt.
Saudi J Anaesth. 2016 Jul-Sep;10(3):295-300. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.174898.
Laryngeal mask airway (LMA) is an useful alternative to endotracheal tube for airway management. The risk of life-threatening adverse respiratory events during its use is rare, but we need to know about the risk-adjusted prediction of its insertion failure requiring rescue tracheal intubation and its impact on patient outcome.
Five hundred patients; 6 months to 12-year-old, American Society of Anesthesiologists I and II scheduled to undergo elective surgical procedures that require general anesthesia were included in this study. LMA was inserted after induction of anesthesia. The insertion conditions, intra, and postoperative events were recorded. Our primary outcome variable was trial success from the first time.
We recorded 426 cases (85.2%) of first trial success with clear airway compared to 46 case (9.2%) of second trial success (P ≤ 0.001). Predictors of failure of first attempt of LMA insertion include abnormal airway anatomy (91%), body weight <16 kg and age below 5 years (44%), the use of LMA size of 1 and 1.5 (3.8%), the intraoperative lateral position (3.8%).
The data obtained from this study support the use of the LMA as a reliable pediatric supraglottic airway device, demonstrating relatively low failure rates. Predictors of LMA failure in the pediatric surgical population should be independently considered.
The study is registered in the Australian and New Zealand clinical trial registry with the allocated trial number: ACTRN12614000994684. Web address of trial: http://www.ANZCTR.org.au/A CTRN12614000994684.aspx.
喉罩气道(LMA)是气管内插管进行气道管理的一种有用替代方法。使用过程中发生危及生命的不良呼吸事件的风险罕见,但我们需要了解其插入失败需要紧急气管插管的风险调整预测及其对患者预后的影响。
本研究纳入500例年龄在6个月至12岁、美国麻醉医师协会分级为I级和II级、计划接受需要全身麻醉的择期外科手术的患者。麻醉诱导后插入LMA。记录插入情况、术中及术后事件。我们的主要结局变量是首次尝试成功。
我们记录到426例(85.2%)首次尝试成功且气道清晰的病例,相比之下,46例(9.2%)第二次尝试成功(P≤0.001)。LMA首次插入失败的预测因素包括气道解剖结构异常(91%)、体重<16 kg和年龄<5岁(44%)、使用1号和1.5号LMA(3.8%)、术中侧卧位(3.8%)。
本研究获得的数据支持将LMA用作可靠的小儿声门上气道装置,显示出相对较低的失败率。小儿外科人群中LMA失败的预测因素应独立考虑。
该研究已在澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册中心注册,分配的试验编号为:ACTRN12614000994684。试验网址:http://www.ANZCTR.org.au/ACTRN12614000994684.aspx。