Department of Anaesthesia, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011 Jun;28(6):443-8. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328345a413.
We hypothesised that the effects of insertion of an i-gel supraglottic airway management device on intraocular pressure (IOP) and haemodynamic variables would be milder than those associated with insertion of a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) or an endotracheal tube.
This study evaluated IOP and haemodynamic responses following insertion of an i-gel airway, LMA or endotracheal tube.
This was a randomised controlled study in a tertiary care centre in which 60 adults scheduled for elective non-ophthalmic procedures under general anaesthesia were allocated to one of three groups. Patients with pre-existing glaucoma, cardiovascular, pulmonary or metabolic diseases or anticipated difficult intubation were excluded.
Following induction of general anaesthesia, an endotracheal tube, LMA or i-gel device was inserted.
IOP, SBP, DBP, heart rate (HR) and perfusion index were measured before induction of anaesthesia and before and after insertion of the airway device.
Insertion of the i-gel did not increase IOP. Insertion of an endotracheal tube increased IOP from 11.6 ± 1.6 to 16.5 ± 1.7 mmHg (P < 0.001). The post-insertion IOP exceeded the pre-induction value (P < 0.05). Insertion of the LMA increased IOP from 13.0 ± 1.5 to 14.7 ± 1.8 mmHg (P < 0.01), but this did not exceed the pre-induction value. Tracheal intubation significantly increased HR, SBP and DBP. Insertion of the LMA significantly increased HR and SBP. These increases were significantly higher than those which followed insertion of the i-gel device. Insertion of the endotracheal tube or LMA resulted in a significant decrease in perfusion index which was maintained for 5 min following tracheal intubation and for 2 min after insertion of the LMA. Insertion of the i-gel device did not change perfusion index significantly.
Insertion of the i-gel device provides better stability of IOP and the haemodynamic system compared with insertion of an endotracheal tube or LMA in patients undergoing elective non-ophthalmic surgery.
我们假设,插入 i-gel 声门上气道管理装置对眼内压(IOP)和血流动力学变量的影响将比插入喉罩气道(LMA)或气管内导管的影响更轻微。
本研究评估了插入 i-gel 气道、LMA 或气管内导管后 IOP 和血流动力学反应。
这是一项在三级护理中心进行的随机对照研究,其中 60 名计划在全身麻醉下接受择期非眼科手术的成年人被分配到三组之一。患有先前存在的青光眼、心血管、肺部或代谢疾病或预计插管困难的患者被排除在外。
全身麻醉诱导后,插入气管内导管、LMA 或 i-gel 装置。
在麻醉诱导前、插入气道装置前后测量 IOP、SBP、DBP、心率(HR)和灌注指数。
插入 i-gel 不会增加 IOP。插入气管内导管使 IOP 从 11.6±1.6mmHg 增加到 16.5±1.7mmHg(P<0.001)。插入后 IOP 超过了诱导前的值(P<0.05)。插入 LMA 使 IOP 从 13.0±1.5mmHg 增加到 14.7±1.8mmHg(P<0.01),但未超过诱导前的值。气管插管显著增加 HR、SBP 和 DBP。插入 LMA 显著增加 HR 和 SBP。这些增加明显高于插入 i-gel 装置后的增加。插入气管内导管或 LMA 导致灌注指数显著降低,气管插管后 5 分钟内和插入 LMA 后 2 分钟内持续降低。插入 i-gel 装置对灌注指数没有显著影响。
在接受择期非眼科手术的患者中,与插入气管内导管或 LMA 相比,插入 i-gel 装置可提供更好的 IOP 和血液动力学系统稳定性。