Schiefer U, Brenner-Delarbre B, Schütte E, Aulhorn E
Fortschr Ophthalmol. 1989;86(2):138-45.
A new type of stereotest for distant vision (after Kolling) is compared with established stereotests for distant (different types of Zeiss Polatest) and near vision (Titmus, TNO, Lang tests) in a total of 203 patients. The Kolling test is based on the three-rod method in accordance with Helmholtz. The apparatus does not require separation of the visual input of the two eyes. This new stereotest is practice-oriented, quick, easy to understand and gives reliable and reproducible results. The test cannot be completed successfully with monocular viewing, if the head is fixed. The results show a good correspondence between the Kolling test and the Zeiss Polatest using disparate outlined figures. The Zeiss Polatest using random-dot patterns turned out to have the strictest criteria for this purpose of all stereotests. Interestingly enough, subjects performed much better in stereotests for near vision (Titmus, TNO tests) than in those for distant vision (Kolling test, different types of Zeiss Polatest). The widespread use of stereotests of near vision in driving tests is therefore problematic.
在总共203名患者中,将一种新型的远视力立体视觉测试(科林测试)与已有的远视力立体视觉测试(不同类型的蔡司偏振立体视觉测试)和近视力立体视觉测试(Titmus、TNO、朗氏测试)进行了比较。科林测试基于符合亥姆霍兹理论的三杆法。该仪器不需要分离双眼的视觉输入。这种新的立体视觉测试以实践为导向,快速、易于理解,并且能给出可靠且可重复的结果。如果头部固定,单眼观察无法成功完成该测试。结果表明,科林测试与使用不同轮廓图形的蔡司偏振立体视觉测试结果具有良好的一致性。在所有立体视觉测试中,使用随机点图案的蔡司偏振立体视觉测试为此目的设定的标准最为严格。有趣的是,受试者在近视力立体视觉测试(Titmus、TNO测试)中的表现比在远视力立体视觉测试(科林测试、不同类型的蔡司偏振立体视觉测试)中要好得多。因此,近视力立体视觉测试在驾驶测试中的广泛应用存在问题。