Kusuma Dian, Cohen Jessica, McConnell Margaret, Berman Peter
Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Global Health and Population, 655 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Center for Health Economics and Policy Studies, Faculty of Public Health Universitas Indonesia, Kampus Baru UI, Depok 16424, Indonesia.
Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Global Health and Population, 655 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Aug;163:10-20. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.06.020. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
Despite global efforts in maternal health, 303,000 maternal deaths still occurred globally in 2015. One explanation is a considerable inequality in maternal mortality and the sources such as nutritional status and health utilization. One strategy to fight health inequality due to poverty is conditional cash transfer (CCT). Taking advantage of two large clustered-randomized trials in Indonesia from 2007 to 2009, this paper provides evidence on the effects of household cash transfers (PKH) and community cash transfers (Generasi) on determinants of maternal mortality. The sample sizes are 14,000 households for PKH and 12,000 households for Generasi. After two years of implementation, difference-in-differences (DID) analyses show that the two programs can improve determinants of maternal mortality with Generasi provides positive impact in some aspects of determinants, but PKH does not. Generasi improves maternal health knowledge, reduces financial barriers to accessing health services and improves utilization of health services, increases utilization among higher-risk women, improves posyandu equipment, and increases nutritional intake. As for PKH, evidence shows its strongest effects only on utilization of health services. Both programs, however, are unlikely to have a large effect on maternal mortality due to design and implementation issues that might significantly reduce program effectiveness. While the programs improved utilization, they did so at community-based facilities not equipped with emergency obstetric care. In the midst of popularity of household cash transfer, our results show that community cash transfer offers a viable policy alternative to improve the determinants of maternal mortality by allowing more flexibility in activities and at lower cost by monitoring at community level.
尽管全球在孕产妇健康方面做出了努力,但2015年全球仍有30.3万例孕产妇死亡。一种解释是孕产妇死亡率以及营养状况和卫生服务利用等因素存在相当大的不平等。应对贫困导致的健康不平等的一种策略是有条件现金转移支付(CCT)。本文利用印度尼西亚2007年至2009年的两项大型整群随机试验,提供了关于家庭现金转移支付(PKH)和社区现金转移支付(Generasi)对孕产妇死亡决定因素影响的证据。PKH的样本量为14000户家庭,Generasi的样本量为12000户家庭。实施两年后,双重差分(DID)分析表明,这两个项目都能改善孕产妇死亡的决定因素,Generasi在某些决定因素方面产生了积极影响,但PKH没有。Generasi提高了孕产妇健康知识,减少了获得卫生服务的经济障碍,提高了卫生服务利用率,增加了高风险妇女的利用率,改善了母婴保健站设施,并增加了营养摄入。至于PKH,证据表明其仅对卫生服务利用有最强的影响。然而,由于设计和实施问题可能会显著降低项目效果,这两个项目都不太可能对孕产妇死亡率产生重大影响。虽然这些项目提高了利用率,但它们是在没有配备产科急诊的社区设施中实现的。在家庭现金转移支付流行之际,我们的结果表明,社区现金转移支付提供了一种可行的政策选择,通过在活动中提供更大的灵活性,并在社区层面进行监测,以更低的成本来改善孕产妇死亡的决定因素。