Suppr超能文献

无聚合物西罗莫司和普罗布考洗脱支架与新一代佐他莫司洗脱支架治疗ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的五年随访

Five-year follow-up of polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents versus new generation zotarolimus-eluting stents in patients presenting with st-elevation myocardial infarction.

作者信息

Colleran Roisin, Kufner Sebastian, Harada Yukinori, Giacoppo Daniele, Cassese Salvatore, Repp Janika, Wiebe Jens, Lohaus Raphaela, Lahmann Annalena, Schneider Simon, Ibrahim Tareq, Laugwitz Karl-Ludwig, Kastrati Adnan, Byrne Robert A

机构信息

Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.

I. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Feb 15;89(3):367-374. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26597. Epub 2016 Jul 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation are at increased risk of late adverse events, partly explained by an exaggerated inflammatory reaction to durable-polymer stent coatings.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to investigate whether implantation of polymer-free DES would reduce this risk.

METHODS

In the ISAR-TEST 5 (the Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results: Test Efficacy of Sirolimus- and Probucol- and Zotarolimus-Eluting Stents) trial, patients were randomly allocated to receive a polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent or a new generation durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent. We analyzed late clinical outcomes in the subgroup of patients presenting with STEMI. The primary endpoint was the combined incidence of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction or target lesion revascularization at 5 years.

RESULTS

311 patients with STEMI were randomized to receive sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents (n = 215) or zotarolimus-eluting stents (n = 96). At 5 years, there was no difference in the incidence of the primary endpoint in patients treated with sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents versus zotarolimus-eluting stents (18.3% versus 20.1% respectively, hazard ratio = 0.87, 95% CI, 0.50-1.51; P = 0.62). Rates of the individual components of the primary endpoint were also comparable in both groups. The incidence of definite/probable stent thrombosis was 1.4% versus 1.0% respectively (hazard ratio = 1.35, 95% CI, 0.14-12.94, P = 0.80).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term outcomes of patients with STEMI treated with polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents versus durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stents were similar. Stent thrombosis rates were low and comparable in both treatment groups, with no events beyond 12 months.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier NCT 00598533) © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

摘要

背景

接受药物洗脱支架(DES)植入的ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者发生晚期不良事件的风险增加,部分原因是对耐用聚合物支架涂层的炎症反应过度。

目的

我们试图研究植入无聚合物DES是否会降低这种风险。

方法

在ISAR-TEST 5(冠状动脉内支架置入术和血管造影结果:西罗莫司、普罗布考和佐他莫司洗脱支架的测试疗效)试验中,患者被随机分配接受无聚合物西罗莫司和普罗布考洗脱支架或新一代耐用聚合物佐他莫司洗脱支架。我们分析了STEMI患者亚组的晚期临床结局。主要终点是5年时心源性死亡、靶血管相关心肌梗死或靶病变血运重建的联合发生率。

结果

311例STEMI患者被随机分配接受西罗莫司和普罗布考洗脱支架(n = 215)或佐他莫司洗脱支架(n = 96)。5年时,接受西罗莫司和普罗布考洗脱支架治疗的患者与接受佐他莫司洗脱支架治疗的患者的主要终点发生率无差异(分别为18.3%和20.1%,风险比 = 0.87,95% CI,0.50 - 1.51;P = 0.62)。两组主要终点的各个组成部分的发生率也相当。明确/可能的支架血栓形成发生率分别为1.4%和1.0%(风险比 = 1.35,95% CI,0.14 - 12.94,P = 0.80)。

结论

接受无聚合物西罗莫司和普罗布考洗脱支架治疗的STEMI患者与接受耐用聚合物佐他莫司洗脱支架治疗的患者的长期结局相似。两个治疗组的支架血栓形成率都很低且相当,12个月后无事件发生。

临床试验注册

在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(标识符NCT 00598533)© 2016威利期刊公司

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验