• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大规模所有患者群体中无聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架

Polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stents in a large-scale all-comers population.

作者信息

Krackhardt Florian, Kočka Viktor, Waliszewski Matthias W, Utech Andreas, Lustermann Meik, Hudec Martin, Studenčan Martin, Schwefer Markus, Yu Jiangtao, Jeong Myung Ho, Ahn Taehoon, Wan Ahmad Wan Azman, Boxberger Michael, Schneider André, Leschke Matthias

机构信息

Kardiologie, Campus Virchow-Klinikum Charité, Berlin, Germany.

Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Královské Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Open Heart. 2017 Jun 6;4(2):e000592. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2017-000592. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1136/openhrt-2017-000592
PMID:28761678
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5515132/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of a polymer-free sirolimus coated, ultrathin strut drug-eluting stent (PF-SES) in an unselected patient population with a focus on acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Furthermore, stable coronary artery disease (CAD) with short (≤6 months) versus long (>6 months) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) were also studied.

METHODS

Patients who received PF-SES were investigated in an unselected large-scale international, single-armed, multicenter, 'all comers' observational study. The primary endpoint was the 9-month target lesion revascularisation (TLR) rate, whereas secondary endpoints included the 9-month major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and procedural success rates. A priori defined subgroups such as patients with ACS, diabetes, lesion subsets and procedural characteristics relative to DAPT were investigated.

RESULTS

A total of 2877 patients of whom 1084 had ACS were treated with PF-SES (1.31±0.75 stents per patient). At 9 months, the accumulated overall TLR rate was 2.3% (58/2513). There was no significant difference between ACS and stable CAD (2.6% vs 2.1%, p=0.389). However, the overall MACE rate was 4.3% (108/2513) with a higher rate in patients with ACS when compared with the stable CAD subgroup (6.1%, 58/947 vs 3.2%, 50/1566, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

PF-SES angioplasty is safe and effective in the daily clinical routine with low rates of TLR and MACE in an unselected patient population. Our data are in agreement with prior clinical findings that extended DAPT duration beyond 6 months do not improve clinical outcomes in patients with stable CAD (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02629575).

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02629575.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是评估一种无聚合物西罗莫司涂层超薄支架药物洗脱支架(PF-SES)在未选择的患者群体中的安全性和有效性,重点关注急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)。此外,还研究了稳定冠状动脉疾病(CAD)采用短期(≤6个月)与长期(>6个月)双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)的情况。

方法

在一项未选择的大规模国际单臂多中心“所有患者均可入组”的观察性研究中,对接受PF-SES的患者进行了调查。主要终点是9个月时的靶病变血运重建(TLR)率,次要终点包括9个月时的主要不良心脏事件(MACE)和手术成功率。对预先定义的亚组进行了调查,如ACS患者、糖尿病患者、病变亚组以及与DAPT相关的手术特征。

结果

共有2877例患者接受了PF-SES治疗,其中1084例患有ACS(每位患者植入1.31±0.75个支架)。9个月时,累积的总体TLR率为2.3%(58/2513)。ACS和稳定CAD之间无显著差异(2.6%对2.1%,p = 0.389)。然而,总体MACE率为4.3%(108/2513),ACS患者的MACE率高于稳定CAD亚组(6.1%,58/947对3.2%,50/1566,p<0.001)。

结论

在日常临床实践中,PF-SES血管成形术是安全有效的,在未选择的患者群体中TLR和MACE发生率较低。我们的数据与先前的临床研究结果一致,即对于稳定CAD患者,将DAPT持续时间延长至6个月以上并不能改善临床结局(ClinicalTrials.gov标识符NCT02629575)。

试验注册号

NCT02629575。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5696/5515132/d7962aad2537/openhrt-2017-000592f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5696/5515132/5e388582551c/openhrt-2017-000592f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5696/5515132/4199378d7e7f/openhrt-2017-000592f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5696/5515132/d7962aad2537/openhrt-2017-000592f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5696/5515132/5e388582551c/openhrt-2017-000592f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5696/5515132/4199378d7e7f/openhrt-2017-000592f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5696/5515132/d7962aad2537/openhrt-2017-000592f03.jpg

相似文献

1
Polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stents in a large-scale all-comers population.大规模所有患者群体中无聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架
Open Heart. 2017 Jun 6;4(2):e000592. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2017-000592. eCollection 2017.
2
Nine-month clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes treated with polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stents and 6‑month vs. 12‑month dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT).接受无聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架治疗及6个月与12个月双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)的糖尿病患者的9个月临床结局。
Herz. 2019 Aug;44(5):433-439. doi: 10.1007/s00059-017-4675-x. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
3
Propensity score matched all comers population treated with ultra-thin strut bare metal and sirolimus-probucol coated drug-eluting stents of identical stent architecture.倾向评分匹配了接受相同支架结构的超薄支柱裸金属支架和西罗莫司-普罗布考涂层药物洗脱支架治疗的所有患者群体。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jun;91(7):1221-1228. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27306. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
4
In-Hospital and 1-Year Clinical Results from the French Registry Using Polymer-Free Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in Acute Coronary Syndrome and Stable Coronary Artery Disease.法国注册研究中急性冠脉综合征和稳定型冠心病患者使用无聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架的院内和 1 年临床结果。
J Interv Cardiol. 2023 Dec 13;2023:8907315. doi: 10.1155/2023/8907315. eCollection 2023.
5
Subgroup Analysis Comparing Ultrathin, Bioresorbable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin, Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients.急性冠状动脉综合征患者中比较超薄可降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与薄型持久聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架的亚组分析
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Oct;11(10):e007331. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007331.
6
Impact of Coronary Stent Architecture on Clinical Outcomes: Do Minor Changes in Stent Architecture Really Matter?冠状动脉支架结构对临床结局的影响:支架结构的微小变化真的重要吗?
Cardiol Ther. 2021 Jun;10(1):175-187. doi: 10.1007/s40119-020-00204-4. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
7
9-month results of polymer-free sirolimus eluting stents in young patients compared to a septuagenarian and octogenarian all-comer population.与七旬和八旬全年龄段人群相比,年轻患者使用无聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架的9个月结果。
J Interv Cardiol. 2018 Jun;31(3):338-344. doi: 10.1111/joic.12472. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
8
Polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stent use in Europe and Asia: Ethnic differences in demographics and clinical outcomes.聚合物涂层雷帕霉素洗脱支架在欧洲和亚洲的应用:人种差异对人口统计学和临床结果的影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 13;15(1):e0226606. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226606. eCollection 2020.
9
A more-Comers populAtion trEated with an ultrathin struts polimer-free Sirolimus stent: an Italian post-maRketing study (the CAESAR registry).一项关于使用超薄支架无聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架治疗更多患者人群的研究:一项意大利上市后研究(凯撒注册研究)
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jan 8;10:1326091. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1326091. eCollection 2023.
10
Safety and efficacy of polymer-free biolimus-eluting stents versus ultrathin stents in unprotected left main or coronary bifurcation: A propensity score analysis from the RAIN and CHANCE registries.聚合物涂层雷帕霉素洗脱支架与超薄支架治疗无保护左主干或冠状动脉分叉病变的安全性和疗效:RAIN 和 CHANCE 注册研究的倾向评分分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Feb 15;95(3):522-529. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28413. Epub 2019 Aug 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Polymer-free stents for percutaneous coronary intervention in diabetic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.无聚合物支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗糖尿病患者:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Future Cardiol. 2024;20(9):485-497. doi: 10.1080/14796678.2024.2370688. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
2
A more-Comers populAtion trEated with an ultrathin struts polimer-free Sirolimus stent: an Italian post-maRketing study (the CAESAR registry).一项关于使用超薄支架无聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架治疗更多患者人群的研究:一项意大利上市后研究(凯撒注册研究)
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jan 8;10:1326091. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1326091. eCollection 2023.
3
In-Hospital and 1-Year Clinical Results from the French Registry Using Polymer-Free Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in Acute Coronary Syndrome and Stable Coronary Artery Disease.

本文引用的文献

1
2-Year Outcomes of High Bleeding Risk Patients After Polymer-Free Drug-Coated Stents.聚合物涂层药物洗脱支架置入后高出血风险患者的 2 年结局
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Jan 17;69(2):162-171. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.10.009. Epub 2016 Oct 30.
2
Five-year clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus treated with polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents versus second-generation zotarolimus-eluting stents: a subgroup analysis of a randomized controlled trial.接受无聚合物西罗莫司和普罗布考洗脱支架治疗的糖尿病患者与第二代佐他莫司洗脱支架治疗患者的五年临床结局:一项随机对照试验的亚组分析
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2016 Sep 1;15(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12933-016-0429-y.
3
法国注册研究中急性冠脉综合征和稳定型冠心病患者使用无聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架的院内和 1 年临床结果。
J Interv Cardiol. 2023 Dec 13;2023:8907315. doi: 10.1155/2023/8907315. eCollection 2023.
4
Safety and Efficacy of Post-Dilation in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using Polymer-Free Ultrathin Strut Sirolimus-Probucol Coated Drug-Eluting Stents.使用无聚合物超薄支柱西罗莫司-普罗布考涂层药物洗脱支架进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时后扩张的安全性和有效性
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Sep 12;59(9):1649. doi: 10.3390/medicina59091649.
5
Clinical outcomes following polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stent implantations in unselected patients: A descriptive subgroup analysis in patients with renal impairment.未选择患者中无聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架植入后的临床结局:肾功能损害患者的描述性亚组分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jul 17;99(29):e21244. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021244.
6
Real-World Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Following Polymer-Free Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantations to Treat Coronary Artery Disease.真实世界中无聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架置入治疗冠状动脉疾病后的双联抗血小板治疗。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2020 Jun;34(3):335-344. doi: 10.1007/s10557-020-06963-5.
7
Unrestricted use of polymer-free sirolimus eluting stents in routine clinical practice.在常规临床实践中无限制使用无聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Feb;99(8):e19119. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019119.
8
Polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stent use in Europe and Asia: Ethnic differences in demographics and clinical outcomes.聚合物涂层雷帕霉素洗脱支架在欧洲和亚洲的应用:人种差异对人口统计学和临床结果的影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 13;15(1):e0226606. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226606. eCollection 2020.
9
Most Promising Therapies in Interventional Cardiology.介入心脏病学最有前途的治疗方法。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2019 Mar 13;21(4):26. doi: 10.1007/s11886-019-1108-x.
10
Comparative preclinical evaluation of a polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stent in porcine coronary arteries.无聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架在猪冠状动脉中的临床前比较评估。
Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2019 Jan-Dec;13:1753944719826335. doi: 10.1177/1753944719826335.
Drug-Eluting or Bare-Metal Stents for Coronary Artery Disease.
用于冠状动脉疾病的药物洗脱支架或裸金属支架
N Engl J Med. 2016 Sep 29;375(13):1242-52. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1607991. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
4
Will LEADERS-FREE change my practice? A randomised double-blind comparison of the BioFreedom™ drug-coated stent vs. the Gazelle™ bare metal stent in patients at high bleeding risk using a short (1 month) course of dual antiplatelet therapy.
EuroIntervention. 2016 Aug 20;12(6):798-800. doi: 10.4244/EIJV12I6A129.
5
Efficacy and safety of prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy: a meta-analysis of 15 randomized trials enrolling 85 265 patients.延长双联抗血小板治疗的疗效和安全性:纳入 85265 例患者的 15 项随机试验的荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2016 Oct;2(4):218-28. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvw011. Epub 2016 Apr 21.
6
Surrogate and clinical endpoints in interventional cardiology: are statistics the brakes?介入心脏病学中的替代终点和临床终点:统计学是刹车器吗?
Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2016 Oct;10(5):314-26. doi: 10.1177/1753944716656150. Epub 2016 Jul 4.
7
Five-year follow-up of polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents versus new generation zotarolimus-eluting stents in patients presenting with st-elevation myocardial infarction.无聚合物西罗莫司和普罗布考洗脱支架与新一代佐他莫司洗脱支架治疗ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的五年随访
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Feb 15;89(3):367-374. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26597. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
8
Meta-Analysis of the Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients Treated With Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents.第二代药物洗脱支架治疗患者双联抗血小板治疗持续时间的Meta分析
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Jun 1;117(11):1714-23. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.03.005. Epub 2016 Mar 19.
9
One-year clinical outcome of amphilimus polymer-free drug-eluting stent in diabetes mellitus patients: Insight from the ASTUTE registry (AmphilimuS iTalian mUlticenTre rEgistry).无聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架在糖尿病患者中的一年临床结局:来自ASTUTE注册研究(意大利西罗莫司多中心注册研究)的见解
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Jul 1;214:113-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.03.088. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
10
Development and Validation of a Prediction Rule for Benefit and Harm of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Beyond 1 Year After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗1年后双联抗血小板治疗获益与风险预测规则的制定与验证
JAMA. 2016 Apr 26;315(16):1735-49. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.3775.