Suppr超能文献

无聚合物涂层西罗莫司和普罗布考洗脱支架与新一代佐他莫司洗脱支架治疗冠状动脉疾病的比较:冠状动脉支架置入术和血管造影结果:西罗莫司和普罗布考洗脱支架与佐他莫司洗脱支架疗效比较试验(ISAR-TEST 5)

Polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting versus new generation zotarolimus-eluting stents in coronary artery disease: the Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results: Test Efficacy of Sirolimus- and Probucol-Eluting versus Zotarolimus-eluting Stents (ISAR-TEST 5) trial.

机构信息

Deutsches Herzzentrum, Technische Universität, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Circulation. 2011 Aug 2;124(5):624-32. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.026732. Epub 2011 Jul 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Durable polymer coatings have been implicated in mid- and long-term adverse events after drug-eluting stent implantation. A polymer-free dual-drug sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent and a new generation permanent polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent are recently developed technologies demonstrating encouraging results.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In a clinical trial with minimal exclusion criteria, we randomly assigned 3002 patients to treatment with sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents versus zotarolimus-eluting stents. The trial was designed to demonstrate noninferiority of the sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents. The primary end point was the combined incidence of cardiac death, target-vessel-related myocardial infarction, or target-lesion revascularization at 1-year follow-up. Follow-up angiography was scheduled at 6 to 8 months. The sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent was noninferior to the zotarolimus-eluting stent in terms of occurrence of the primary end point (13.1% versus 13.5%, respectively, P(noninferiority)=0.006; hazard ratio=0.97, 95% confidence interval, 0.78 to 1.19; P(superiority)=0.74). The incidence of definite/probable stent thrombosis was low in both groups (1.1% versus 1.2%, respectively; hazard ratio=0.91 [95% confidence interval, 0.45 to 1.84], P=0.80). With regard to angiographic efficacy, there were no differences between the sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent and the zotarolimus-eluting stent in terms of either in-segment binary angiographic restenosis (13.3% versus 13.4% respectively; P=0.95) or in-stent late luminal loss (0.31±0.58 mm versus 0.29±0.56 mm, respectively; P=0.46).

CONCLUSION

In this large-scale study powered for clinical end points, a polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent was noninferior to a new generation durable polymer-based zotarolimus-eluting stent out to 12 months.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier NCT 00598533.

摘要

背景

药物洗脱支架置入后,耐用聚合物涂层与中期和长期不良事件有关。最近开发了无聚合物的双重药物西罗莫司和普罗布考洗脱支架和新一代永久性聚合物佐他莫司洗脱支架,这些技术显示出令人鼓舞的结果。

方法和结果

在一项排除标准最低的临床试验中,我们将 3002 名患者随机分为西罗莫司和普罗布考洗脱支架组与佐他莫司洗脱支架组。该试验旨在证明西罗莫司和普罗布考洗脱支架不劣于佐他莫司洗脱支架。主要终点是 1 年随访时心脏死亡、靶血管相关心肌梗死或靶病变血运重建的联合发生率。计划在 6 至 8 个月进行随访血管造影。西罗莫司和普罗布考洗脱支架在主要终点方面不劣于佐他莫司洗脱支架(分别为 13.1%和 13.5%,P(非劣效性)=0.006;风险比=0.97,95%置信区间,0.78 至 1.19;P(优越性)=0.74)。两组中确定/可能的支架血栓形成发生率均较低(分别为 1.1%和 1.2%;风险比=0.91[95%置信区间,0.45 至 1.84],P=0.80)。在血管造影疗效方面,在节段内二分类血管造影再狭窄(分别为 13.3%和 13.4%,P=0.95)或支架内晚期管腔丢失(分别为 0.31±0.58mm 和 0.29±0.56mm,P=0.46)方面,西罗莫司和普罗布考洗脱支架与佐他莫司洗脱支架均无差异。

结论

在这项针对临床终点的大规模研究中,无聚合物的西罗莫司和普罗布考洗脱支架在 12 个月时不劣于新一代基于耐用聚合物的佐他莫司洗脱支架。

临床试验注册

http://www.clinicaltrials.gov。唯一标识符 NCT 00598533。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验