Suppr超能文献

有证据表明,《平价医疗法案》(ACA)的烟草附加费降低了保险参保率,且并未提高戒烟率。

Evidence Suggests That The ACA's Tobacco Surcharges Reduced Insurance Take-Up And Did Not Increase Smoking Cessation.

作者信息

Friedman Abigail S, Schpero William L, Busch Susan H

机构信息

Abigail S. Friedman (

William L. Schpero is a PhD student in the Department of Health Policy and Management at the Yale School of Public Health.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Jul 1;35(7):1176-83. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1540.

Abstract

To account for tobacco users' excess health care costs and encourage cessation, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) allowed insurers to impose a surcharge on tobacco users' premiums for plans offered on the health insurance exchanges, or Marketplaces. Low-income tax credits for Marketplace coverage were based on premiums for non-tobacco users, which means that these credits did not offset any surcharge costs. Thus, this policy greatly increased out-of-pocket premiums for many tobacco users. Using data for 2011-14 from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, we examined the effect of tobacco surcharges on insurance status and smoking cessation in the first year of the exchanges' implementation, among adults most likely to purchase insurance from them. Relative to smokers who faced no surcharges, smokers facing medium or high surcharges had significantly reduced coverage (reductions of 4.3 percentage points and 11.6 percentage points, respectively), but no significant differences in smoking cessation. In contrast, those facing low surcharges showed significantly less smoking cessation. Taken together, these findings suggest that tobacco surcharges conflicted with a major goal of the ACA-increased financial protection-without increasing smoking cessation. States should consider these potential effects when deciding whether to limit surcharges to less than the federal maximum.

摘要

为了应对烟草使用者过高的医疗保健成本并鼓励戒烟,《平价医疗法案》(ACA)允许保险公司对在医疗保险交易所(即市场)提供的保险计划中烟草使用者的保费征收附加费。市场保险的低收入税收抵免基于非烟草使用者的保费,这意味着这些抵免无法抵消任何附加费成本。因此,这项政策大幅增加了许多烟草使用者的自付保费。利用行为风险因素监测系统2011 - 2014年的数据,我们研究了烟草附加费对交易所实施第一年中最有可能从其购买保险的成年人的保险状况和戒烟情况的影响。与未面临附加费的吸烟者相比,面临中等或高附加费的吸烟者的保险覆盖率显著降低(分别降低了4.3个百分点和11.6个百分点),但在戒烟方面没有显著差异。相比之下,面临低附加费的吸烟者的戒烟率显著较低。综合来看,这些发现表明烟草附加费与《平价医疗法案》的一个主要目标——增强经济保障——相冲突,同时又未能提高戒烟率。各州在决定是否将附加费限制在低于联邦最高水平时应考虑这些潜在影响。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Incentives for smoking cessation.戒烟的激励措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 May 18(5):CD004307. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004307.pub5.
2
Randomized trial of four financial-incentive programs for smoking cessation.四项戒烟经济激励方案的随机试验。
N Engl J Med. 2015 May 28;372(22):2108-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414293. Epub 2015 May 13.
8
The use of financial incentives in promoting smoking cessation.利用经济激励促进戒烟。
Prev Med. 2012 Nov;55 Suppl(Suppl):S24-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.04.007. Epub 2012 Apr 16.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验