• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与医院特定剖宫产率相关的因素。

Factors associated with hospital-specific cesarean birth rates.

作者信息

Newton E R, Higgins C S

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio 78284.

出版信息

J Reprod Med. 1989 Jun;34(6):407-11.

PMID:2738872
Abstract

The variation in hospital-specific cesarean birth rates was examined using a multiple regression analysis in a national data base of deliveries in 1977. This data base included 222,285 singleton births in 282 hospitals representing all regions of the United States. The 32 independent variables included measures of medical risk, technologic sophistication, demographic characteristics and economic incentives. The incidences of medical risk factors, nonwhite race and ratio of obstetricians to fertile women were associated positively with hospital-specific cesarean delivery rates. Participation in health maintenance organizations and numbers of deliveries were correlated negatively with those rates. Hospital-specific cesarean delivery rates were not associated with technologic sophistication, malpractice premiums or reimbursement differences between routes of delivery. Pay source stratified models explained 45-63% of the variation in the hospital-specific cesarean rates. Sensitivity analysis revealed that even a 50% change in the incidence of any independent variable would change the cesarean delivery rate by less than 2%.

摘要

利用多元回归分析,对1977年全国分娩数据库中各医院的剖宫产率差异进行了研究。该数据库包含了美国282家医院的222,285例单胎分娩,这些医院代表了美国所有地区。32个自变量包括医疗风险、技术复杂性、人口统计学特征和经济激励措施等指标。医疗风险因素的发生率、非白人种族以及产科医生与育龄妇女的比例与各医院的剖宫产率呈正相关。参与健康维护组织以及分娩数量与这些比率呈负相关。各医院的剖宫产率与技术复杂性、医疗事故保险费或不同分娩途径的报销差异无关。按支付来源分层的模型解释了各医院剖宫产率45% - 63%的差异。敏感性分析表明,即使任何一个自变量的发生率变化50%,剖宫产率的变化也不到2%。

相似文献

1
Factors associated with hospital-specific cesarean birth rates.与医院特定剖宫产率相关的因素。
J Reprod Med. 1989 Jun;34(6):407-11.
2
Cesarean delivery in Native American women: are low rates explained by practices common to the Indian health service?美国原住民女性的剖宫产:低剖宫产率是否可以用印第安健康服务机构的常见做法来解释?
Birth. 2005 Sep;32(3):170-8. doi: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2005.00366.x.
3
Risk adjusting cesarean delivery rates: a comparison of hospital profiles based on medical record and birth certificate data.剖宫产率的风险调整:基于病历和出生证明数据的医院概况比较。
Health Serv Res. 2001 Oct;36(5):959-77.
4
The cesarean birth rate: influence of hospital teaching status.剖宫产率:医院教学状况的影响
Health Serv Res. 1991 Aug;26(3):325-37.
5
Institutional factors in cesarean delivery rates: policy and research implications.剖宫产率的制度性因素:政策与研究启示
Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jan;103(1):128-36. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000102935.91389.53.
6
Change in cesarean section rate as a reflection of the present malpractice crisis.剖宫产率的变化作为当前医疗事故危机的一种反映。
Conn Med. 2005 Mar;69(3):139-41.
7
Economic incentives in the choice between vaginal delivery and cesarean section.阴道分娩与剖宫产选择中的经济激励因素。
Milbank Q. 1993;71(3):365-404.
8
Effect of managed care enrollment on primary and repeat cesarean rates among U.S. Department of Defense health care beneficiaries in military and civilian hospitals worldwide, 1999-2002.1999 - 2002年全球军事和民用医院中美国国防部医疗保健受益人的管理式医疗注册对初次和再次剖宫产率的影响。
Birth. 2004 Dec;31(4):254-64. doi: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2004.00317.x.
9
The physician factor in cesarean birth rates.剖宫产率中的医生因素。
N Engl J Med. 1989 Mar 16;320(11):706-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198903163201106.
10
Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.39周选择性剖宫产:对肩难产、胎儿创伤、新生儿脑病及胎儿宫内死亡的影响
Semin Perinatol. 2006 Oct;30(5):276-87. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2006.07.009.

引用本文的文献

1
Caesarean section in uninsured women in the USA: systematic review and meta-analysis.美国未参保女性的剖宫产:系统评价与荟萃分析
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 3;9(3):e025356. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025356.
2
Hospital differences in cesarean deliveries in Massachusetts (US) 2004-2006: the case against case-mix artifact.马萨诸塞州(美国) 2004-2006 年医院剖宫产差异:病例组合人为因素之辩。
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e57817. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057817. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
3
Variation in cesarean section rates among hospitals in Washington State.
华盛顿州各医院剖宫产率的差异。
Am J Public Health. 1993 Aug;83(8):1109-12. doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.8.1109.
4
Racial/ethnic differences in the likelihood of cesarean delivery, California.加利福尼亚州剖宫产分娩可能性中的种族/族裔差异。
Am J Public Health. 1995 May;85(5):625-30. doi: 10.2105/ajph.85.5.625.