• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

剖宫产率中的医生因素。

The physician factor in cesarean birth rates.

作者信息

Goyert G L, Bottoms S F, Treadwell M C, Nehra P C

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State University-Hutzel Hospital, Detroit.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 1989 Mar 16;320(11):706-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198903163201106.

DOI:10.1056/NEJM198903163201106
PMID:2922015
Abstract

To investigate the influence of physicians' practice styles on the rate of deliveries by cesarean section, we studied 1533 affluent women at low risk of obstetrical complications who were cared for by 11 obstetricians in a single community hospital. The mean rate of delivery by cesarean section was 26.9 percent, but the rate ranged from 19.1 to 42.3 percent, according to the physician. The mean rate of primary cesarean section (i.e., the rate for women without previous cesarean deliveries) was 17.2, with a range of 9.6 to 31.8 percent. A stepwise logistic-regression model of the determinants of primary cesarean section, including the individual physician, parity, birth weight, and maternal age and excluding specific medical indications, showed that only nulliparity (P less than 0.0001) was more important than the identity of the physician (P less than 0.001) in its influence on the rate of cesarean section. Variation in cesarean-section rates among physicians was not attributable to the practice setting, the patient population, the degree of obstetrical risk, or the physician's recent medicolegal experience, and it was not accompanied by corresponding differences in neonatal outcome. We conclude that individual practice style may be an important determinant of the wide variations in the rates of cesarean delivery among obstetricians. Our data do not permit us to say with certainty whether the procedure is overused by some obstetricians or underused by others, but we found no obvious differences in neonatal outcome associated with differences in the cesarean-section rate.

摘要

为了研究医生的执业风格对剖宫产率的影响,我们对一家社区医院的11位产科医生所护理的1533名低产科并发症风险的富裕女性进行了研究。剖宫产的平均发生率为26.9%,但根据医生的不同,发生率在19.1%至42.3%之间。首次剖宫产的平均发生率(即此前未进行过剖宫产的女性的发生率)为17.2%,范围在9.6%至31.8%之间。一个关于首次剖宫产决定因素的逐步逻辑回归模型,包括个体医生、产次、出生体重、产妇年龄且排除特定医学指征,结果显示,在对剖宫产率的影响方面,只有初产(P<0.0001)比医生的身份(P<0.001)更重要。医生之间剖宫产率的差异并非归因于执业环境、患者群体、产科风险程度或医生近期的医疗法律经历,并且也未伴随新生儿结局的相应差异。我们得出结论,个体执业风格可能是产科医生剖宫产率广泛差异的一个重要决定因素。我们的数据无法让我们确定该手术是否被一些产科医生过度使用或被另一些产科医生使用不足,但我们发现剖宫产率的差异与新生儿结局之间没有明显差异。

相似文献

1
The physician factor in cesarean birth rates.剖宫产率中的医生因素。
N Engl J Med. 1989 Mar 16;320(11):706-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198903163201106.
2
Practice variations between family physicians and obstetricians in the management of low-risk pregnancies.家庭医生与产科医生在低风险妊娠管理方面的实践差异。
J Fam Pract. 1995 Apr;40(4):345-51.
3
A successful program to lower cesarean-section rates.一项降低剖宫产率的成功计划。
N Engl J Med. 1988 Dec 8;319(23):1511-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198812083192304.
4
Reducing the cesarean section rate in a rural community hospital.降低农村社区医院的剖宫产率。
CMAJ. 1991 Dec 1;145(11):1459-64.
5
Clinical practice guideline for cesarean section due to cephalopelvic disproportion.头盆不称剖宫产临床实践指南
J Med Assoc Thai. 2006 Jun;89(6):735-40.
6
Relation of private or clinic care to the cesarean birth rate.私立或诊所护理与剖宫产率的关系。
N Engl J Med. 1986 Sep 4;315(10):619-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198609043151005.
7
Women's autonomy and scheduled cesarean sections in Brazil: a cautionary tale.巴西的女性自主权与择期剖宫产:一则警示故事。
Birth. 2008 Mar;35(1):33-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2007.00209.x.
8
Effect of instrument preference for operative deliveries on obstetrical and neonatal outcomes.手术分娩器械偏好对产科和新生儿结局的影响。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007 Oct;134(2):164-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.10.002. Epub 2006 Nov 16.
9
Cesarean section: Norwegian women do as obstetricians do--not as obstetricians say.剖宫产:挪威女性的做法与产科医生的教导背道而驰。
Birth. 2008 Jun;35(2):117-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00224.x.
10
Specialty differences in primary cesarean section rates in a rural hospital.一家农村医院剖宫产率的专科差异。
Fam Pract Res J. 1992 Sep;12(3):245-53.

引用本文的文献

1
Socioeconomic disadvantage and racial/ethnic disparities in low-risk cesarean birth in California.加利福尼亚州低风险剖宫产中的社会经济劣势与种族/民族差异
Am J Epidemiol. 2025 Jan 8;194(1):132-141. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae157.
2
Pattern of cesarean deliveries among women in an urban and rural district in Egypt.埃及城乡地区妇女剖宫产模式。
Afr Health Sci. 2022 Dec;22(4):375-385. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v22i4.43.
3
Alarming Trends of Cesarean Section-Time to Rethink: Evidence From a Large-Scale Cross-sectional Sample Survey in India.
令人担忧的剖宫产时间趋势:来自印度大规模横断面抽样调查的证据。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 13;25:e41892. doi: 10.2196/41892.
4
Risk orientation predicts hypoxic time during difficult airway simulation: a mixed-methods pilot study.风险取向可预测困难气道模拟期间的低氧时间:一项混合方法的试点研究。
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2019 Dec 3;6(4):232-234. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2019-000515. eCollection 2020.
5
Changing scenario of C-section delivery in India: Understanding the maternal health concern and its associated predictors.印度剖宫产分娩情况的变化:了解孕产妇健康问题及其相关预测因素。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2021 Nov;10(11):4182-4188. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_585_21. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
6
Factors Associated with the Type of Cesarean Section in Greece and Their Correlation with International Guidelines.希腊剖宫产类型的相关因素及其与国际指南的相关性。
Acta Inform Med. 2021 Mar;29(1):38-44. doi: 10.5455/aim.2021.29.38-44.
7
The effect of labor epidural analgesia on labor, delivery, and neonatal outcomes: a propensity score-matched analysis in a single Japanese institute.分娩硬膜外镇痛对分娩、产程及新生儿结局的影响:日本单所机构的倾向评分匹配分析
JA Clin Rep. 2019 Jun 18;5(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s40981-019-0260-z.
8
Medical and non-medical reasons for cesarean section delivery in Egypt: a hospital-based retrospective study.埃及剖宫产的医学和非医学原因:一项基于医院的回顾性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Nov 8;19(1):411. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2558-2.
9
Caesarean section in uninsured women in the USA: systematic review and meta-analysis.美国未参保女性的剖宫产:系统评价与荟萃分析
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 3;9(3):e025356. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025356.
10
Factors associated with cesarean delivery rates: a single-institution experience.剖宫产率相关因素:单机构经验
Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol. 2017 Apr 21;3:8. doi: 10.1186/s40748-017-0047-z. eCollection 2017.