Davies Elizabeth A, Coupland Victoria H, Dixon Steve, Mokbel Kefah, Jack Ruth H
Public Health England, Knowledge and Intelligence (London), 2nd Floor, Skipton House, 80 London Road, London, SE1 6HL, UK.
King's College London, Health and Social Care Research, Faculty of Health Sciences & Medicine, 5th Floor, Capital House, 42 Weston Street, London, SE1 3QD, UK.
BMC Cancer. 2016 Jul 7;16:421. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2439-2.
Data from providers of private cancer care are not yet formally included in English cancer registration data. This study aimed to test the exchange of breast cancer data from one Hospital Corporation of America International (HCAI) hospital in London with the cancer registration system and assess the suitability of these data for comparative analyses of case mix and adjusted survival.
Data on 199 London women receiving 'only HCAI care', 278 women receiving 'some HCAI care' (HCAI and other services), and 31,234 other London women diagnosed between 2005 and 2011 could be identified and compared. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox regression was used to adjust for age, socioeconomic deprivation, year of diagnosis, stage of disease and recorded treatment.
Women receiving 'only HCAI care' were younger, lived in areas of higher affluence (47.8 % vs 27.6 %) and appeared less likely to be recorded as having screen-detected (2.5 % vs 25.0 %) disease than other London women. Women receiving 'some HCAI care' were more similar to 'HCAI only' women. Although HCAI stage of disease data completeness improved during the study period, this was less complete overall than cancer registration data and limited the comparative survival analyses. An apparent survival advantage for 'HCAI only' women compared with other London women (hazard ratio 0.48, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.32-0.74) was attenuated and no longer statistically significant after adjustment (0.79, 95 % CI: 0.51-1.21). Women receiving 'some HCAI care' appeared to have higher survival (hazard ratio 0.24, 95 % CI 0.14-0.41) which was attenuated to 0.48 (95 % CI: 0.28-0.80) in the fully adjusted model.
Exchange of data between the private cancer sector and the English cancer registration service can identify patients who receive all or some private care. The better survival of women receiving only or some HCAI breast cancer care appears to be at least partly explained by demographic, disease, and treatment factors. However, larger studies using similarly quality assured datasets and more complete staging data from the private sector are needed to produce definitive comparative results.
私立癌症护理机构提供的数据尚未正式纳入英国癌症登记数据中。本研究旨在测试伦敦一家美国医院集团国际部(HCAI)医院的乳腺癌数据与癌症登记系统之间的交换情况,并评估这些数据在病例组合比较分析和调整后生存率分析中的适用性。
可以识别并比较2005年至2011年间在伦敦接受“仅HCAI护理”的199名女性、接受“部分HCAI护理”(HCAI护理和其他服务)的278名女性以及31234名其他伦敦女性的数据。使用Kaplan-Meier方法估计总生存率,并使用Cox回归对年龄、社会经济剥夺程度、诊断年份、疾病阶段和记录的治疗进行调整。
接受“仅HCAI护理”的女性更年轻,生活在富裕程度较高的地区(47.8%对27.6%),与其他伦敦女性相比,被记录为筛查发现疾病的可能性似乎更低(2.5%对25.0%)。接受“部分HCAI护理”的女性与“仅接受HCAI护理”的女性更为相似。尽管在研究期间HCAI疾病阶段数据的完整性有所提高,但总体上仍不如癌症登记数据完整,这限制了比较生存分析。与其他伦敦女性相比,“仅接受HCAI护理”的女性明显的生存优势(风险比0.48,95%置信区间(CI):0.32 - 0.74)在调整后减弱且不再具有统计学意义(0.79,95% CI:0.51 - 1.21)。接受“部分HCAI护理”的女性似乎生存率更高(风险比0.24,95% CI 0.14 - 0.41),在完全调整模型中减弱至0.48(95% CI:0.28 - 0.80)。
私立癌症部门与英国癌症登记服务之间的数据交换可以识别接受全部或部分私立护理的患者。仅接受或部分接受HCAI乳腺癌护理的女性更好的生存率似乎至少部分可以由人口统计学、疾病和治疗因素来解释。然而,需要使用质量保证类似的数据集以及来自私立部门更完整的分期数据进行更大规模的研究,以得出明确的比较结果。