Nenning Andreas, Navickas Edvinas, Hutter Herbert, Fleig Jürgen
Institute of Chemical Technologies and Analytics, Vienna University of Technology , Getreidemarkt 9, Vienna, A-1060, Austria.
J Phys Chem Lett. 2016 Jul 21;7(14):2826-31. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00778. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
Isotope exchange depth profiling and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy are usually regarded as complementary tools for measuring the surface oxygen exchange activity of mixed conducting oxides, for example used in solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) electrodes. Only very few studies compared electrical (k(q)) and tracer (k*) exchange coefficients of solid-gas interfaces measured under identical conditions. The 1:1 correlation between k(q) and k* often made is thus more an assumption than experimentally verified. In this study it is shown that the measured rates of electrical and tracer exchange of oxygen may strongly differ. Simultaneous acquisition of k(q) and k* on La0.6Sr0.4FeO3-δ and SrTi0.3Fe0.7O3-δ thin film electrodes revealed that k* > 100 k(q) in humid oxidizing ((16)O2 + H2(18)O) and humid reducing (H2 + H2(18)O) atmospheres. These results are explained by fast water adsorption and dissociation on surface oxygen vacancies, forming two surface hydroxyl groups. Hence, interpreting experimentally determined k* values in terms of electrochemically relevant oxygen exchange is not straightforward.
同位素交换深度剖析和电化学阻抗谱通常被视为用于测量混合导电氧化物表面氧交换活性的互补工具,例如用于固体氧化物燃料电池(SOFC)电极。只有极少数研究比较了在相同条件下测量的固 - 气界面的电(k(q))和示踪剂(k*)交换系数。因此,常提到的k(q)与k之间的1:1相关性更多是一种假设,而非经过实验验证。本研究表明,所测量的氧的电交换和示踪剂交换速率可能存在很大差异。在La0.6Sr0.4FeO3-δ和SrTi0.3Fe0.7O3-δ薄膜电极上同时获取k(q)和k,结果表明在潮湿氧化((16)O2 + H2(18)O)和潮湿还原(H2 + H2(18)O)气氛中k* > 100k(q)。这些结果可通过水在表面氧空位上的快速吸附和解离来解释,形成两个表面羟基。因此,根据与电化学相关的氧交换来解释实验测定的k*值并非易事。